Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rosenberg Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
52
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$220k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Philanthropy$5.2MCrime & Legal$3.8MCivil Rights$2.9MHuman Services$1.9MReligion$1.4MCommunity Improvement$1.3MEmployment$682kEducation$514kOther$0
02FY2024 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k23 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $532k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $476k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$59M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLIANCE FOR SAFETY AND JUSTICE$220,000
SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$105,000
GRACE$90,833
TIDES CENTER$60,000
TIDES FOUNDATION$40,000
NORTH BAY JOBS WITH JUSTICE$40,000
LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION$40,000
ALLIANCE SAN DIEGO$35,000
TIDES ADVOCACY$35,000
CENTRAL VALLEY IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION COLLABORATIVE$31,750
TRANSGENDER LAW CENTER$30,000
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$30,000
AL OTRO LADO$25,000
UCLA CENTER FOR LABOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION$25,000
UC BERKELEY CENTER FOR LABOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SILICON VALLEY DE-BUG: $75k → 8%AL OTRO LADO: $100k → 11%SILICON VALLEY DEBUG: $75k → 8%AL OTRO LADO: $50k → 11%SILICON VALLEY DE-BUG: $25k → 8%AI OTRO LADO: $50k → 11%SILICON VALLEY DE-BUG: $20k → 8%AL OTRO LADO: $25k → 11%CENTRAL VALLEY IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION COLLABORATIVE: $30k → 19%SILICON VALLEY DE-BUG: $15k → 8%INDIGENOUS JUSTICE: $15k → 12%PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS: $83k → 11%TODEC LEGAL CENTER: $20k → 11%CENTRAL VALLEY IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION COLLABORATIVE: $20k → 19%PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS: $83k → 11%TODEC LEGAL CENTER: $20k → 11%CENTRAL VALLEY IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION COLLABORATIVE: $32k → 19%PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS: $25k → 11%TODEC LEGAL CENTER: $20k → 11%PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS: $20k → 11%TODEC LEGAL CENTER: $20k → 11%CENTRAL VALLEY IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION COLLABORATIVE: $30k → 19%TODEC LEGAL CENTER: $15k → 11%CENTRAL VALLEY IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION COLLABORATIVE: $30k → 19%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $40k → 10%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $20k → 10%YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $250k → 10%YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $167k → 10%YOUNG WOMENS FREEDOM CENTER: $83k → 10%YOUNG WOMENS FREEDOM CENTER: $83k → 10%YOUNG WOMENS FREEDOM CENTER: $20k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $400k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $400k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $350k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $300k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $300k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $250k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $125k → 10%FREEFROM: $50k → 14%TIDES CENTER: $75k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $60k → 10%FREEFROM: $50k → 14%TIDES CENTER: $60k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $60k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $30k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $25k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $25k → 10%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
CA
AZ
DC
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 17% of Rosenberg Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Rosenberg Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 79 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +116% since the first grant, against +51% for the ones you funded once.

79 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 48 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

79
82

Total granted

$12M
$1.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+116%
+51%

Still filing today

78%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $117k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsHuman ServicesCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR SAFETY AND JUSTICE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $840k · revenue +56%
  • YW
    YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER
    5× · 2019–2024 · $627k · revenue +516%
  • G
    GRACE
    4× · 2020–2024 · $607k · revenue +240% · 27% of their budget

Funded once

  • AF
    AMITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • UC
    UCLA CENTER FOR POLICING EQUITY
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • CT
    CHANEY TURNER LEADING EDGE FELLOWSH
    one grant, 2023 · $83k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
3
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
4
Justice Funders

Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.

—
5
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California

The american civil liberties union of northern california (aclu nc union) defends and advances the principles of freedom, equality and justice contained in the united states constitution. aclu nc union, a california mutual benefit…

—
6
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
7
Inner City Law Center

In 2024, Inner City Law Center, ICLC, served over 3,400 people, helping vulnerable Angelenos to remain in their homes and recover nearly $20.5 million in financial benefits.

Crime & Legal
8
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
9
Asian Immigrant Women Advocates Inc

Asian Immigrant Women Advocates empowers low-income, limited English speaking immigrant women and youth through education, leadership development and civic participation programs.

Human Services
10
Unitedly

Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Human Services
11
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
12
California Collaborative for Immigrant Justice

Ccij utilizes coordination, advocacy, and legal services to fight for the liberationof immigrants in detention in california. we seek to empower immigrants in detentionand their communities through technical assistance, education, and…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Policylink and the most unlike its peers is Sierra Health Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyNonprofit Advocacy and Supp…University Support Foundati…Community Health CentersCommunity Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Climate and Environmental A…Family Philanthropic Founda…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%4%<5yr15%14%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr18%29%20–35yr11%23%35–55yr13%7%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%19%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr18%36%20–35yr11%16%35–55yr13%6%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%1/133
the rest of the field
14%
18,384/131,244

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

131 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 131 of the 188 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
47
Early backer (in before they grew)
130/131
Grantees still filing
95/131
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE & ED FUND — $610,000 · OtherMEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE & ED FUNDGRACE — $607,499 · OtherGRACECHANEY TURNER (LEADING EDGE FELLOWSHIP GRANT TO INVIDUAL) — $416,667 · OtherCHANEY TURNER (LEADING EDGE FELLOWSHIP GRAN…ARIA SA-ID (LEADING EDGE FELLOWSHIP GRANT TO INDIVIDUAL — $416,666 · OtherARIA SA-ID (LEADING EDGE FELLOWSHIP GRANT T…BRANDON ANDERSON (LEADING EDGE FELLOWSHIP GRANT TO INDIVIDUAL) — $416,666 · OtherBRANDON ANDERSON (LEADING EDGE FELLOWSHIP G…California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation — $355,000 · OtherUNITED FARM WORKER FOUNDATION — $260,000 · OtherWarehouse Worker Resource Center — $265,000 · Other+102 more — $3,858,580 · Other+102 moreTIDES CENTER — $2,500,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTERYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER — $627,096 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTERForward Change — $500,000 · Human ServicesForward ChangeAL OTRO LADO — $225,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS — $221,666 · Human ServicesSilicon Valley De-Bug — $210,000 · Human Services+11 more — $493,750 · Human Services+11 moreThe Center for Media Justice DBA MediaJustice — $595,000 · Civil RightsThe Center fo…Anti Police-Terror Project Inc — $530,000 · Civil RightsAnti Police-T…FARMWORKER JUSTICE FUND INC — $210,000 · Civil RightsFARMWORKER JU…IMPACT JUSTICE — $150,000 · Civil RightsIMPACT JUSTIC…ELLA BAKER CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS — $135,000 · Civil RightsELLA BAKER CE…CALIFORNIA IMMIGRANT POLICY CENTER — $100,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE — $100,000 · Civil RightsNorth Bay Jobs With Justice — $80,000 · Civil Rights+10 more — $373,950 · Civil Rights+10 moreTIDES FOUNDATION — $535,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDA…Silicon Valley Community Foundation — $505,000 · PhilanthropySilicon Vall…LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION — $465,000 · PhilanthropyLIBERTY HILL…Dignity and Power Now — $191,668 · PhilanthropyDignity and …PROGRESSIVE MULTIPLIER FUND — $160,000 · PhilanthropyPROGRESSIVE …+10 more — $176,500 · Philanthropy+10 moreALLIANCE FOR SAFETY AND JUSTICE — $840,000 · Crime & LegalEssie Justice Group — $176,666 · Crime & LegalTHE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION — $100,000 · Crime & LegalASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $60,000 · Crime & Legal+5 more — $82,500 · Crime & LegalMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER — $520,000 · Community ImprovementPOLICYLINK — $165,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $75,000 · Community Improvement+7 more — $95,000 · Community ImprovementSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $186,668 · EducationNEW BREATH FOUNDATION — $166,668 · EducationEducation and Leadership Foundation — $80,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION — $40,000 · EducationPROTEUS FUND INC — $30,000 · Education+4 more — $34,000 · Education
Other$7,206,078Human Services$4,777,512Civil Rights$2,273,950Philanthropy$2,033,168Crime & Legal$1,259,166Community Improvement$855,000Education$537,336

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTIDES CENTER — $2,500,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetALLIANCE FOR SAFETY AND JUSTICE — $840,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER — $627,096 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetGRACE — $607,499 over 4y, 27% of budgetThe Center for Media Justice DBA MediaJustice — $595,000 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $535,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAnti Police-Terror Project Inc — $530,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER — $520,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation — $505,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetForward Change — $500,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION — $465,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetCalifornia Rural Legal Assistance Foundation — $355,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetWarehouse Worker Resource Center — $265,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetSIERRA HEALTH FOUNDATION CENTER FOR HEALTH PROGRAM MANAGEMENT — $240,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetAL OTRO LADO — $225,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS — $221,666 over 4y, 8.4% of budgetSilicon Valley De-Bug — $210,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetFARMWORKER JUSTICE FUND INC — $210,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetSTARTING OVER INC — $201,666 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $200,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDignity and Power Now — $191,668 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $186,668 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKHMER GIRLS IN ACTION — $186,666 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetEssie Justice Group — $176,666 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetPeace Development Fund — $170,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $169,166 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNEW BREATH FOUNDATION — $166,668 over 2y, 18% of budgetPOLICYLINK — $165,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPROGRESSIVE MULTIPLIER FUND — $160,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetIMPACT JUSTICE — $150,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCentral Valley Immigrant Integration Collaborative — $141,750 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetBAY AREA LEGAL AID — $140,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetELLA BAKER CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS — $135,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetTodec Legal Center Perris — $112,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCALIFORNIA IMMIGRANT POLICY CENTER — $100,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE — $100,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION — $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFreefrom — $100,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetEducation and Leadership Foundation — $80,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetNorth Bay Jobs With Justice — $80,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTHOUSAND CURRENTS — $75,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFORWARD IMPACT — $75,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetEqual Justice Society — $71,500 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetTIDES ADVOCACY — $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $60,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetIMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER — $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTransgender Law Center — $60,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR SAFETY AND JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GRACE ↗
  • Who funds The Center for Media Justice DBA MediaJustice ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Anti Police-Terror Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Silicon Valley Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Forward Change ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Warehouse Worker Resource Center ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA HEALTH FOUNDATION CENTER FOR HEALTH PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ↗
  • Who funds AL OTRO LADO ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS ↗
  • Who funds Silicon Valley De-Bug ↗
  • Who funds FARMWORKER JUSTICE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds STARTING OVER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Dignity and Power Now ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds KHMER GIRLS IN ACTION ↗
  • Who funds Essie Justice Group ↗
  • Who funds Peace Development Fund ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW BREATH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds POLICYLINK ↗
  • Who funds PROGRESSIVE MULTIPLIER FUND ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds Central Valley Immigrant Integration Collaborative ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA LEGAL AID ↗
  • Who funds ELLA BAKER CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The California Endowm…The California Wellne…The San Francisco Fou…The James Irvine Foun…Weingart FoundationEast Bay Community Fo…Amalgamated Charitabl…The Heising-Simons Fo…Silicon Valley Commun…California Physicians…Tides FoundationSierra Health Foundat…
The California EndowmentCA94.6× affinity55 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The California Endowment · The California Wellness Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Weingart Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Heising-Simons Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Tides Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rosenberg Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    39report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 188 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home