Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rosemary Kraemer Raitt Foundation Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$474k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$116k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.8MEnvironment$938kEducation$384kFood & Nutrition$223kHealth$205kHuman Services$155kCivil Rights$75kPhilanthropy$57kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $256k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $216k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ECOLOGY CENTER$115,747
LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY$100,000
CALIFORINA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS$40,000
UNDIES FOR EVERYONE$25,750
HAMMER MUSEUM$25,450
SD CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM$25,200
Individual grant recipient$25,020
FEEDING SAN DIEGO$25,000
PROMISES2KIDS$25,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$25,000
KCRW FOUNDATION$10,000
PBS SOCAL$10,000
ART & PRACTICE$10,000
WALDON WOODS PROJECT$10,000
SD HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WALDON WOODS PROJECT: $26k → 8%THE ECOLOGY CENTER: $136k → 10%PROMISES2KIDS: $30k → 11%KCRW Foundation: $120k → 14%UNDIES FOR EVERYONE: $26k → 16%NPR: $50k → 14%WALDON WOODS PROJECT: $26k → 8%THE ECOLOGY CENTER: $136k → 10%PROMISES2KIDS: $25k → 11%KCRW Foundation: $120k → 14%NPR: $25k → 14%THE ECOLOGY CENTER: $131k → 10%LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY: $100k → 11%KCRW Foundation: $110k → 14%NPR: $25k → 14%THE ECOLOGY CENTER: $122k → 10%PROMISES2KIDS: $25k → 11%KCRW FOUNDATION: $35k → 14%NPR INC: $25k → 14%The Ecology Center: $117k → 10%LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY: $25k → 11%THE ECOLOGY CENTER: $116k → 10%The Ecology Center: $58k → 10%The Ecology Center: $30k → 10%CALIFORINA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS: $40k → 11%Swim with Mike: $100k → 14%CALIFORINA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS: $30k → 11%Swim with Mike: $100k → 14%KPBS: $100k → 11%UCLA: $155k → 14%KPBS: $100k → 11%UCLA: $100k → 14%KPBS: $100k → 11%UCLA: $50k → 14%KPBS: $100k → 11%HAMMER MUSEUM: $25k → 14%KPBS: $100k → 11%KPBS: $50k → 11%KPBS: $50k → 11%FEEDING SAN DIEGO: $35k → 11%San Diego Children's Discovery Muse: $65k → 11%LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $32k → 14%San Diego Children's Discovery Muse: $61k → 11%SAN DIEGO CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $50k → 11%SAN DIEGO CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $47k → 11%San Diego Children's Discovery Muse: $40k → 11%SAN DIEGO CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $30k → 11%SD CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 48% of Rosemary Kraemer Raitt Foundation Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 49%.

Rosemary Kraemer Raitt Foundation Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 18 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against -53% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$4.0M
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
-53%

Still filing today

72%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthEducationEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    ECOLOGY CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $846k · revenue +139%
  • KF
    KCRW FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $455k · revenue +9%
  • SD
    SAN DIEGO CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM
    6× · 2017–2022 · $293k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • SW
    SWIM WITH MIKE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -53%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • L
    LACMA
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
2
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
3
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
4
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
5
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
6
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
7
The California Medical Innovations Institute Inc

The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…

Education
8
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
9
San Diego State University Foundation Sdsu Research Foundation

To support and further the research, education and community service objectives of san diego state university.

Education
10
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
11
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
12
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding San Diego; the most unlike its peers is Art & Practice. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KPBS: $600,000 · OtherKPBSKCRW FOUNDATION INC: $455,000 · OtherKCRW FOUNDATION INCUCLA: $380,000 · OtherUCLAIndividual grant recipient: $225,020 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY: $185,630 · OtherLA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGYPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION: $155,000 · OtherPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATIONPBS SOCAL: $129,988 · OtherPBS SOCALNPR: $125,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $82,086 · Other+8 more: $61,958 · OtherECOLOGY CENTER: $846,380 · EnvironmentECOLOGY CENTERSAN DIEGO CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $293,375 · Arts & CultureSAN DIEGO CHI…ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $115,150 · Arts & CultureARMAND HAMMER…THE WALDEN WOODS PROJECT: $91,500 · Arts & CultureTHE WALDEN WO…FEEDING SAN DIEGO: $125,000 · Food & NutritionART & PRACTICE: $55,000 · PhilanthropyUndies for Everyone: $51,750 · PhilanthropyAMADOR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS CORPORATION: $70,000 · EducationSWIM WITH MIKE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 · Health
Other$2,399,682Environment$846,380Arts & Culture$500,025Food & Nutrition$125,000Philanthropy$111,750Education$95,000Health$19,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetECOLOGY CENTER: $846,380 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetKCRW FOUNDATION INC: $455,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetSAN DIEGO CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $293,375 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetLA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY: $185,630 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION: $155,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $115,150 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WALDEN WOODS PROJECT: $91,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $82,086 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS CORPORATION: $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetART & PRACTICE: $55,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUndies for Everyone: $51,750 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetSWIM WITH MIKE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMADOR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD OF CHILDREN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ECOLOGY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds KCRW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WALDEN WOODS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ART & PRACTICE ↗
  • Who funds Undies for Everyone ↗
  • Who funds SWIM WITH MIKE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMADOR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD OF CHILDREN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of San DiegoCA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rosemary Kraemer Raitt Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rosemary Kraemer Raitt Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Walden Woods Project: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rosemary Kraemer Raitt Foundation Trust?

Find your warmest path to Rosemary Kraemer Raitt Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rosemary Kraemer Raitt’s filings →

More from the funding graph