Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rose Marie Princ Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2022
4
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.

Health$60kHuman Services$50kEmployment$40kHousing & Shelter$40kEducation$31kAnimals$10kFood & Nutrition$10k
02FY2022 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$847k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE$20,000
LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION$20,000
NEVADA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$10,000
PROJECT 150 INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION SO NEVADA: $10k → 13%LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $20k → 13%LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 13%LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 13%PROJECT 150 INC: $10k → 13%NEVADA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%NEVADA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%NEVADA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$160k · 5 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +114% since the first grant, against +51% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$160k
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+114%
+51%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesEmploymentHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LV
    LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION
    3× · 2019–2022 · $40k · revenue +114%
  • OV
    OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE
    3× · 2019–2022 · $40k · revenue +9%
  • NB
    NEVADA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2022 · $30k · revenue +167%

Funded once

  • NC
    NEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +20%
  • MT
    MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • SN
    SAFE NEST
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Healthy Nevada
Health
2
Nevada Agricultural Foundation
Food & Nutrition
3
Nevada Peer Support Network Inc
Health
4
Communities in Schools of Nevada Inc

Communities in schools of nevada, inc. (the organization) was originally established in 1992 as cities of schools of las vegas, but remained relatively dormant until 2003 when it reestablished its mission to coincide with the national…

Human Services
5
The Nevada Bighorns Foundation
Education
6
Nevada Council On Problem Gambling

The nevada council on problem gambling is a non-profit information and referral agency whose efforts are focused on reducing the impact of problem gambling on individuals, families and communities in nevada. it is the mission of the nevada…

—
7
Nevada Partnership for Homeless Youth

The organization provides wraparound services to meet homeless youths' immediate, emergency needs and help them transition to long-term self- sufficiency. the organization's support comes primarily from government grants and corporate…

Housing & Shelter
8
Kids Chance of Nevada

Kids Chance of Nevada provides college and technical scholarships to the children of parents who have been killed or severely injured in a workplace accident in Nevada.

Education
9
Nevada Scottish Rite Foundation
Membership Benefit
10
Habitat for Humanity Las Vegas

Habitat for humanity las vegas, inc. (habitat) a not-for-profit organization located in las vegas, nevada was established in 1990. habitat's purpose is to build low cost houses with the help of the homeowner families, which are transferred…

Housing & Shelter
11
Las Vegas Collegiate

To provide high quality academics to k-5 students

Education
12
Hopelink of Southern Nevada

Hopelink of southern nevada (hopelink) is a nevada nonprofit organization established in 1991 to provide services throughout clark county. hopelink's mission is to build a better community by preventing homelessness, keeping families…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Nevada; the most unlike its peers is Clark County Public Education Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOL: $30,000 · OtherST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOLUMC LIONS BURN CENTER: $20,140 · OtherUMC LIONS BURN CENTERMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATIONSAFE NEST: $10,000 · OtherSAFE NESTLIONS WOUND OF NV BURN CARE: $10,000 · OtherLIONS WOUND OF NV BURN CAREMERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $10,000 · OtherMERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS+1 more: $500 · OtherLAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $40,000 · Human ServicesLAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSIONNEVADA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Human ServicesNEVADA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONPROJECT 150: $10,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT 150MAKE-A-WISH NEVADA: $10,000 · Human ServicesMAKE-A-WISH NEVADAOPPORTUNITY VILLAGE: $40,000 · EmploymentOPPORTUNITY VILLAG…NEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthTHREE SQUARE: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$90,640Human Services$90,000Employment$40,000Health$10,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $40,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOPPORTUNITY VILLAGE: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEVADA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetNEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHREE SQUARE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT 150: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH NEVADA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mgm Resorts FoundationNV17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mgm Resorts Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Mel & Ruth Wolzinger Foundation · Canarelli Family Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · The Boyd Family Foundation · The Shuster Family Foundation · Wynn Resorts Foundation · Vegas Golden Knights Foundation Inc · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · Speedway Children's Charities · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rose Marie Princ Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rose Marie Princ Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rose Marie Princ Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Rose Marie Princ Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rose Marie Princ’s filings →

    More from the funding graph