Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ronald Philip Saturno Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$43kFood & Nutrition$27kReligion$20kRecreation & Sports$10kCivil Rights$8kHuman Services$6kHealth$6kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$174k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
PROJECT OPEN HAND$2,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$2,000
KQED$2,000
FRIENDS OF THE FOUNTAIN$1,000
ALAMEDA CO COMM FOOD BANK$1,000
AMIGOS DE LAS AMERICANS$1,000
NATL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRES$1,000
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FD$1,000
MONO LAKE COMMITTEE$1,000
THE TM CENTER MFUSA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE SALVATION ARMY: $1k → 11%COASTSIDE STATE PARKS ASSOC: $2k → 7%UNDERDOG ANIMAL RESCUE: $1k → 9%SARANA COMMUNITY: $2k → 10%MONO LAKE COMMITTEE: $1k → 10%YOSEMITE CONSERVANCY: $1k → 10%THE TM CENTER MFUSA: $2k → 12%BELLOSGUARDO FD: $3k → 14%GAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS: $1k → 17%AMIGOS DE LAS AMERICANS: $1k → 16%NAT'L TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRES: $2k → 14%THE SALVATION ARMY: $1k → 11%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $2k → 9%FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS ALAMEDA: $1k → 10%YOSEMITE CONSERVANCY: $1k → 10%HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FD: $2k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $2k → 9%SF PARKS ALLIANCE: $3k → 10%HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FD: $2k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $2k → 9%BERKELEY PTRS FOR PARKS: $2k → 10%SF APT ASSOC: $2k → 10%HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FD: $2k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $2k → 9%FRIENDS OF THE FOUNTAIN: $2k → 10%SF APT ASSOC: $2k → 10%BERKELEY PTRS FOR PARKS: $2k → 10%BERKELEY PTRS FOR PARKS: $2k → 10%BERKELEY PATH WANDERERS: $2k → 10%KQED: $3k → 10%KQED: $3k → 10%KQED: $2k → 10%KQED: $2k → 10%KQED: $2k → 10%KQED: $2k → 10%OAKLAND LGBTQ CENTER: $2k → 10%BERKELEY PUBLIC LIABRARY: $3k → 10%BERKELEY PUBLIC LIABRARY: $3k → 10%PROJECT OPEN HAND: $2k → 10%BERKELEY PUBLIC LIABRARY: $3k → 10%PROJECT OPEN HAND: $2k → 10%BERKELEY PUBLIC LIABRARY: $3k → 10%BERKELEY COMM FUND: $3k → 10%BERKELEY PUBLIC LIABRARY: $3k → 10%1ST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCI: $2k → 10%BERKELEY PUBLIC LIABRARY: $2k → 10%BERKELEY PUBLIC LIABRARY: $2k → 10%BERKELEY COMM FUND: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$173k · 21 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
13

Total granted

$173k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+76%

Still filing today

33%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    Project Open Hand
    9× · 2017–2025 · $15k · revenue +139%
  • BH
    BERKELEY HIGH SCHOOL JAZZ
    4× · 2019–2023 · $9k · revenue +18%
  • HR
    HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
  • 1C
    1ST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCI
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Public Press

The mission of the San Francisco Public Press is to enrich civic life by publishing investigative and solutions journalism that engages diverse audiences and promotes public accountability. The San Francisco Public Press…

Education
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
4
Parks California

As california state parks' statutory non-profit partner, we have a clear mission - to help strengthen parks and inspire all people to experience these extraordinary places.

Environment
5
Aids Legal Referral Panel of the San Francisco Bay Area

Our mission is to advance and protect the rights, dignity, and health of people living with hiv/aids in the bay area. continued on schedule owe accomplish this through direct legal representation by one of our staff attorneys, by careful…

Health
6
Sequoia Parks Conservancy

The sequoia parks conservancy funds and enables projects and programs that protect, preserve, and provide access to the natural and cultural resources of sequoia and kings canyon national parks.

Environment
7
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
8
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
9
Sacramento Lgbt Community Center

The Center works to create a region where all LGBTQ+ people thrive; we support health and wellness,advocate for equity and justice, and work to uplift our diverse and culturally rich LGBTQ+ community.

—
10
Berkeley Public Library Foundation

The Berkeley Public Library Foundation (BPLF) amplifies the public investment to make a great public library extraordinary. To that end, we provide vital funds and ongoing advocacy to advance the Library's mission, vision, and strategic…

Philanthropy
11
Unitedly

Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Human Services
12
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Francisco Parks Alliance; the most unlike its peers is The Isabel Allende Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $21,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST VINCENT DE PAUL: $12,500 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAULALAMEDA CO COMM FOOD BANK: $12,000 · OtherALAMEDA CO COMM FOOD BANKFRIENDS OF THE FOUNTAIN: $12,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE FOUNTAINBERKELEY PTRS FOR PARKS: $7,000 · OtherBERKELEY COMM FUND: $5,000 · OtherNAT'L TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRES: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherSF APT ASSOC: $5,000 · OtherST ANTHONY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Other+15 more: $23,500 · Other+15 moreKQED INC: $16,000 · Arts & CultureKQED INCBERKELEY HIGH SCHOOL JAZZ: $8,500 · Arts & CultureBERKELEY HIGH S…COASTSIDE STATE PARKS ASSOCIATION: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCOASTSIDE STATE…Project Open Hand: $15,000 · Food & NutritionHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $7,000 · Civil RightsSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsBerkeley Community Scholars DBA Berkeley Community Fund: $3,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyOakland LGBTQ Community Center Inc: $3,000 · Community Improvement
Other$133,000Arts & Culture$26,500Food & Nutrition$15,000Civil Rights$7,000Recreation & Sports$5,000Philanthropy$4,000Community Improvement$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKQED INC: $16,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetProject Open Hand: $15,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBERKELEY HIGH SCHOOL JAZZ: $8,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOakland LGBTQ Community Center Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBerkeley Community Scholars DBA Berkeley Community Fund: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTSIDE STATE PARKS ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAVENDER YOUTH RECREATION & INFORMATION CENTER INC LYRIC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNDERDOG ANIMAL RESCUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ISABEL ALLENDE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Open Hand ↗
  • Who funds BERKELEY HIGH SCHOOL JAZZ ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds Oakland LGBTQ Community Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Berkeley Community Scholars DBA Berkeley Community Fund ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds COASTSIDE STATE PARKS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds YOSEMITE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LAVENDER YOUTH RECREATION & INFORMATION CENTER INC LYRIC ↗
  • Who funds GAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNDERDOG ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds THE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ISABEL ALLENDE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC8.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ronald Philip Saturno Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ronald Philip Saturno Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ronald Philip Saturno Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ronald Philip Saturno Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ronald Philip Saturno’s filings →

    More from the funding graph