Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ronald and Mary Ann Lachman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$313kPhilanthropy$81kArts & Culture$78kHealth$62kEmployment$40kInternational$33kReligion$18kCivil Rights$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
$1,800
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALEXADER GRAHAM BELL MONTESSORI SCH$31,500
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$15,000
CUE College$10,000
WBEZ - PUBLIC RADIO CHICAGO$5,000
US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$5,000
ILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$5,000
HILLEL OF FARMINGTON HILL MI$3,600
JEWISH COUNCIL ON URBAN AFFAIRS$1,800
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
FOOD ANIMALS CONCERNS TRUST$585
Jewish Federation of Greater Seattl$500
Descendants of Holocaust Survivors$500
Greater Chicago Food Depository$318
Jewish Woman International$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Jewish Family Services: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
PA
CA
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$579k · 16 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
19

Total granted

$579k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+30%

Still filing today

56%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureInternationalHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AG
    ALEXANDER GRAHAM BELL MONTESSORI SCHOOL
    6× · 2018–2025 · $162k · revenue +16%
  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    6× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +13%
  • GH
    GROWING HOME INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $39k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • LT
    Listen Talk
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • RU
    Rush University Medical Centergraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jews for Racial and Economic Justice Action Inc

Jews For Racial & Economic Justice Action (JFREJ Action or JFREJ) is the home for Jewish New Yorkers organizing with our neighbors and allies to transform New York from a playground for the wealthy few into a real democracy for all of us.…

—
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
4
Jewish Coalition for Immigrant Justice Northwest

The jewish coalition builds a jewish voice in the pacific northwest advancing immigrant justice and domestic policy, following the leadership of impacted community.

Human Services
5
Jewish Film Institute

The Jewish Film Institute champions bold films and filmmakers that expand and evolve the Jewish story for audiences everywhere. Through its exhibition and artist development programs, JFI celebrates the spirit of film, inquiry,…

Arts & Culture
6
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
7
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
8
The University of Iowa Louis Shulman Hillel Foundation

The mission of Iowa Hillel is to enhance the lives of Jewish students at the University of Iowa, so they may enrich the Jewish people and the world. Iowa Hillel envisions a world for our students where they find a community here at Iowa…

—
9
Jewish War Veterans of the Usa National Memorial Inc

The mission of the Jewish War Veterans of the USA National Memorial, Inc., doing business as the National Museum of American Jewish Military History, is to preserve, interpret, and share the history of Jewish Americans who have served in…

Arts & Culture
10
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
11
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…

Philanthropy
12
Joint Israel

To help build a more just society by creating model programs for disadvantaged populations. The activities focus primarily on helping Israel overcome the challenges facing five groups (cont. on sched O):

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is America-Israel Friendship League Inc; the most unlike its peers is Listen and Talk. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALTERNATIVES EDUCATION HEARING IMPA: $138,690 · OtherALTERNATIVES EDUCATION HEARING IMPANational Cued Speech Association: $41,500 · OtherNational Cued Speech AssociationILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: $34,800 · OtherILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUMHILLEL OF FARMINGTON HILL MI: $17,200 · OtherWBEZ - PUBLIC RADIO CHICAGO: $13,620 · Other+25 more: $81,263 · Other+25 moreALEXANDER GRAHAM BELL MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $161,500 · EducationALEXANDER GRAHAM BELL MONTE…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $80,400 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED …AMERICA ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION: $4,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyGROWING HOME INC: $39,410 · EmploymentJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $20,000 · InternationalAMERICA-ISRAEL FRIENDSHIP LEAGUE INC: $9,000 · InternationalThe Global FoodBanking Network: $1,000 · InternationalThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $16,450 · Arts & CultureDESCENDANTS OF HOLOCAUST SURVIVORS: $680 · Arts & CultureFOOD ANIMAL CONCERNS TRUST (FACT INC): $9,635 · Animals
Other$327,073Education$162,500Philanthropy$84,900Employment$39,410International$30,000Arts & Culture$17,130Animals$9,635

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALEXANDER GRAHAM BELL MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $161,500 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $80,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGROWING HOME INC: $39,410 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $16,450 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD ANIMAL CONCERNS TRUST (FACT INC): $9,635 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICA-ISRAEL FRIENDSHIP LEAGUE INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $5,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Council on Urban Affairs: $5,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAlbany Park Theater Project: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $1,980 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Global FoodBanking Network: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInjustice Watch NFP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetListen and Talk: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HORIZONS REHABILITATION SERVICES INC: $760 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NORA PROJECT: $750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDESCENDANTS OF HOLOCAUST SURVIVORS: $680 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SEATTLE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Women International: $380 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $318 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALEXANDER GRAHAM BELL MONTESSORI SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds GROWING HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds FOOD ANIMAL CONCERNS TRUST (FACT INC) ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA-ISRAEL FRIENDSHIP LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Council on Urban Affairs ↗
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds Albany Park Theater Project ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds The Global FoodBanking Network ↗
  • Who funds Hillel of San Luis Obispo ↗
  • Who funds Injustice Watch NFP ↗
  • Who funds Listen and Talk ↗
  • Who funds NEW HORIZONS REHABILITATION SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NORA PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds DESCENDANTS OF HOLOCAUST SURVIVORS ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SEATTLE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Chicago Community Trust · Joseph & Bessie Feinberg Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ronald and Mary Ann Lachman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ronald and Mary Ann Lachman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ronald and Mary Ann Lachman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ronald and Mary Ann Lachman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ronald and Mary Ann Lachman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph