How much did RONALD & JOY PAUL FAMILY FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 88% of RONALD & JOY PAUL FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

anti defamationdefamation leaguejewishstock

2021

greaterstockworkscongregation harhar shalomjewish

2022

—

2023

greater

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k40 grants · $54k
$10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$250k+1 grant · $260k

$336

Median grant

States reached

$14M

Total assets

Largest grants

JP MORGAN CHARITABLE GIVING FUND$260,000
EAGLEBANK FOUNDATION$10,000
CONGREGATION HAR SHALOM$9,180
NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION$5,118
MAIN STREET CONNECT$5,000
THE ENGLEWOOD SHTIBEL$5,000
ITINERIS$5,000
HOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION$4,000
INTERNATIONAL MYELOMA FOUNDATION$2,500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON$2,500
THE MORIAH SCHOOL$2,500
BERGEN HATZALAH$1,800
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$1,400
GIVEBUTTER$1,180
WGW COMMUNITY YOUTH CUP$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6% — the area typically sits at 10%. 1% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.7M · 43 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

43 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.7M

$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%

+64%

Still filing today

42%

36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $264k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

E
EVERYMIND
6× · 2017–2024 · $63k · revenue +130%
EF
EAGLEBANK FOUNDATION
4× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +26%
I
ITINERIS
5× · 2020–2024 · $17k · revenue +109%

Funded once

GW
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE & HEALTH SCIENCES
one grant, 2017 · $757k
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION
one grant, 2020 · $57k · revenue 0%
JC
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $52k · revenue +73%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health

Childrens Cancer Therapy

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

—

The Summit Center Inc

To prepare children and adults with developmental disabilities or behavioral challenges and their families for life success. the organization's vision is that everyone with a disability will achieve a full and productive life.

Education

Educare Dc

To eliminate the opportunity gap with high-quality early learning for children prenatal to age 5.

Human Services

The Family Tree Inc

The family tree leads maryland in preventing child abuse, connects caring communities, and buids strong families to improve society for generations.

Unclassified

The Arc Baltimore Inc

The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.

Human Services

Jews United for Justice Inc

To lead washington and baltimore area jews to act on our shared jewish values by pursuing justice and equity in our local community.

Religion

Fcancer

FCANCER IS dedicated to advancing health equity through early detection and prevention programs, and by providing resources to navigate, manage, and cope with cancer.

Health

Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of

Easing the hardship of children's illness on families through programs that directly improve the health and wellbeing of children.

Health

Tiegerman School

Tiegerman's motto, "giving our children a voice", reflects our goal to meet the needs of preschool and school age children with severe language and autism spectrum disorders. we believe that students with autism spectrum disorders have…

—

Seriousfun Children's Network

Our mission is to create opportunities for children and their families to reach beyond serious illness and discover joy, confidence and a new world of possibilities, always free of charge.

Health

Dana-Farber Inc

The purpose and activities of dana-farber, inc. are to promote and support the exempt missions of dana-farber cancer institute and to provide investment management services.

Unclassified

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Identity Inc and the most unlike its peers is Paper Mill Playhouse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/53

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,512

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

52 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

51/52

Grantees still filing

34/52

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,655,994Health$78,446Human Services$70,354Civil Rights$56,848Philanthropy$46,300Arts & Culture$42,600Education$31,035

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC36.7× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Jewish Federation of Greater · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz · Bender Foundation Inc · Robert I Schattner Foundation Inc · The Carl M Freeman Foundation Inc · Louis & Helen Fanaroff Char Foundation · The Gary & Carol Berman Family · The Annette M Lerner and Theodore N · Healthcare Initiative Foundation · National Foundation for Affordable · The Gary and Pennie Abramson Charitable

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation RONALD & JOY PAUL FAMILY FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

16get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: EAGLEBANK FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 920195178 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on EAGLEBANK FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Ronald & Joy Paul Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ronald & Joy Paul Family Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

RONALD & JOY PAUL FAMILY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

52 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Ronald & Joy Paul Family Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

RONALD & JOY PAUL FAMILY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

52 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Ronald & Joy Paul Family Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph