Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ron and Dana Dunford Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

International$713kEducation$420kHuman Services$166kRecreation & Sports$56kCivil Rights$25kHousing & Shelter$23kHealth$2kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMPOWER PLAYGROUNDS$50,000
FIGHT FOR THE FORGOTTEN$25,000
VILLAGE BOOK BUILDERS$25,000
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 52% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEES: $250 → 17%FIGHT FOR THE FORGOTTEN: $25k → 10%AFRICAN HERITAGE INC: $1k → 7%ORAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIP: $1k → 10%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $20k → 17%US SKI AND SNOWBOARD FOUNDATION: $14k → 5%EMPOWER PLAYGROUNDS: $25k → 8%EMPOWER PLAYGROUNDS: $50k → 8%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 12%ORAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIP: $250 → 10%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $1k → 17%US SKI AND SNOWBOARD FOUNDATION: $14k → 5%EMPOWER PLAYGROUNDS: $25k → 8%VILLAGE BOOK BUILDERS: $32k → 8%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $250 → 10%US SKI AND SNOWBOARD FOUNDATION: $14k → 5%CHOICE HUMANITARIAN: $5k → 8%EMPOWER PLAYGROUNDS: $25k → 8%UW GREEN BAY FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%US SKI AND SNOWBOARD FOUNDATION: $9k → 5%CHOICE HUMANITARIAN: $3k → 8%VILLAGE BOOK BUILDERS: $25k → 8%UW GREEN BAY FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%CHOICE HUMANITARIAN: $500 → 8%VILLAGE BOOK BUILDERS: $100k → 8%FREEDOM HOUSE: $3k → 10%MENTORS INTERNATIONAL: $200k → 8%VILLAGE BOOK BUILDERS: $58k → 8%UWGB PHOENIX FUND: $500 → 10%MENTORS INTERNATIONAL: $125k → 8%VILLAGE BOOK BUILDERS: $50k → 8%EXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS: $5k → 10%MENTORS INTERNATIONAL: $100k → 8%EMPOWER PLAYGROUNDS: $50k → 8%GREEN BAY COMMUNITY CHURCH: $500 → 10%MENTORS INTERNATIONAL: $55k → 8%CP CENTER OF NE WISCONSIN: $55k → 10%MENTORS INTERNATIONAL: $50k → 8%CP CENTER OF NE WISCONSIN: $10k → 10%CP CENTER OF NE WISCONSIN: $10k → 10%CP CENTER OF NE WISCONSIN: $10k → 10%CP CENTER OF NE WISCONSIN: $5k → 10%MISSION GUIDES INTERNATIONAL INC: $250 → 10%HOUSE OF HOPE: $5k → 10%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NE WISCONSIN: $1k → 10%NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 11 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
14

Total granted

$1.3M
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+63%

Still filing today

64%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MI
    Mentors International
    5× · 2018–2022 · $530k · revenue +284%
  • VB
    VILLAGE BOOK BUILDERS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $265k · revenue +87%
  • UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $100k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • TR
    THE ROAD HOMEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +48%
  • HO
    HOUSE OF HOPE
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • RF
    RMS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Empower African Children

To create transformative and globally connected learning experiences, preparing orphaned and vulnerable children for a lifetime of influence.

2
Engineers Without Borders- International

EWB International seeks to promote collaboration of the global EWB movement. Together we work towards a sustainable world, where engineering enables long-term positive social and economic development, for the benefit of people and the…

International
3
Empowering Lives International

Empowering Lives International (ELI) ignites world changers. We equip families and orphans to crush poverty, embrace Christ, and share their transformation with others through their God-honoring income, their deepening relationship with…

Religion
4
Shelterbox Usa Inc

The mission of shelterbox usa is to deliver humanitarian relief in the form of equipment and materials that bring shelter, warmth & dignity to people made homeless by natural or other disasters worldwide.

Human Services
5
Zoe Empowers

Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…

International
6
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

7
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
8
Orphan Outreach

To glorify the Lord Jesus Christ by ministering to orphans around the world by meeting spiritual, physical, emotional, and educational needs.

International
9
Every Shelter Inc

Every Shelter's mission is to build a localized refugee-aid ecosystem centered around the needs, preferences, and aspirations of refugees.

Education
10
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
11
Aid for Starving Children

Aid For Starving Children provides assistance around the world to children and their families by providing food, shelter, clean water, financial assistance, education, and emergency relief to victims of famine, natural disasters, and war.

International
12
Lifting Hands International

We provide aid to refugees, both at home and abroad. Simply humanitarian.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Encompass Early Education & Care Inc and the most unlike its peers is Village Book Builders Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Mentors International — $530,000 · InternationalMentors InternationalEmpower Playgrounds Inc — $175,000 · InternationalEmpower Playgrounds Inc+2 more — $8,250 · InternationalVILLAGE BOOK BUILDERS INC — $265,125 · EducationVILLAGE BOOK BUILDERS INCUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GRE…CP CENTER OF NE WISCONSIN — $90,000 · OtherCP CENTER OF NE …UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY — $55,000 · OtherUTAH STATE UNIVE…FIGHT FOR THE FORGOTTEN — $25,000 · OtherFIGHT FOR THE FO…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES — $21,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD …+10 more — $15,750 · Other+10 moreENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE ROAD HOME — $20,000 · Human ServicesUnited States Ski Team Foundation — $51,000 · Recreation & SportsEXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY — $5,000 · HealthFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC — $2,800 · Housing & ShelterNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC — $500 · Housing & Shelter
International$713,250Education$365,125Other$206,750Human Services$70,000Recreation & Sports$51,000Health$5,000Housing & Shelter$3,300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMentors International — $530,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetVILLAGE BOOK BUILDERS INC — $265,125 over 5y, 22% of budgetEmpower Playgrounds Inc — $175,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUnited States Ski Team Foundation — $51,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE INC — $50,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR HUMANITARIAN OUTREACH AND INTERCULTURAL EXCHANGE — $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC — $2,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAFRICAN HERITAGE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John and Engrid Meng IncWI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John and Engrid Meng Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc · George Kress Foundation Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Elizabeth B and Philip J Hendrickson Foundation Ltd · Mark & Mary Peterson Family Foundation Inc · Byron L Walter Family Trust Xxxxx0002 · De Pere Christian Outreach · K C Stock Foundation Inc · Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ron and Dana Dunford Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph