Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ron and Carole Woods Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$690k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$781kHuman Services$660kReligion$397kHousing & Shelter$375kCivil Rights$190kHealth$171kArts & Culture$135kPublic Benefit$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $458k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $220k
$20,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Fostering Hope$120,000
Hillsdale College$50,000
Gospel Rescue Mission$50,000
St Andrews Episocpal Church$47,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
Alliance Defending Freedom$40,000
Will Rogers High School$35,000
Heritage Foundation$30,000
Rescue Those$30,000
John 316 Mission$25,000
Shine Joplin$20,000
Wounded Warriors$20,000
Young America's Foundation$20,000
Grace Episcopal Church$20,000
Tunnel to Towers$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $665k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Shine Joplin: $20k → 18%Shine Joplin: $20k → 18%Shine Joplin: $20k → 18%Shine Joplin: $10k → 18%John 316 Mission: $30k → 15%John 316 Mission: $25k → 15%John 316 Mission: $20k → 15%Fostering Hope: $120k → 19%John 316 Mission: $20k → 15%Fostering Hope: $120k → 19%John 316 Mission: $10k → 15%Fostering Hope: $120k → 19%Fostering Hope: $90k → 19%For His Glory Houses: $25k → 19%Fostering Hope: $15k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
CA
MO
VA
AZ
TN
SC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 25 repeat orgs$235k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
9

Total granted

$2.6M
$203k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
-3%

Still filing today

48%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationReligionYouth DevelopmentHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    FOSTERING HOPE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $465k · revenue +22% · 32% of their budget
  • YA
    Young America's Foundation
    5× · 2021–2025 · $100k · revenue +5%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $100k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • SA
    St Andrews Day Care and School
    one grant, 2022 · $75k
  • SA
    St Andrews Episcopal Church
    one grant, 2021 · $38k
  • FH
    FOR HIS GLORY HOUSES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Leadership Summit

Empowering everyday leaders with courage, tools and hope to ignite a revival of christian leadership.

Religion
2
Amazing Facts International

To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…

Religion
3
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
4
Prison Fellowship International

To transform the lives of prisoners, their families, and victims through a global network of ministry partners.

Crime & Legal
5
Tri-State Christian Academy Inc

Our desire is to provide balanced, biblical direction to the child as a support to the home and to train each student to be self-disciplined and biblically directed in their walk with god and their fellow man. it is also our desire to meet…

Education
6
Faith School of Theology

Faith's purpose is to mentor students for spirit-filled leadership in ministry, in light of the great commission. while academics are important, the classrooms are not the only learning place. through a combination of formal instruction,…

—
7
Explore God Network
—
8
Atj Family Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
9
John Jay Institute for Faith Society and Law Inc

To prepare principled leaders for faith-informed public service.

Religion
10
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
11
God's Image
Human Services
12
Fsi-Freedom Seekers International

Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Wildlife Federation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GOSPEL RESCUE MISSION INC: $350,000 · OtherGOSPEL RESCUE MISSION INCWill Rogers High School: $260,000 · OtherWill Rogers High SchoolIndividual grant recipient: $160,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSt Andrews Episocpal Church: $148,000 · OtherSt Andrews Episocpal ChurchHeritage Foundation: $135,000 · OtherHeritage FoundationYoung America's Foundation: $100,000 · OtherYoung America's FoundationRESCUE THOSE INC: $95,000 · OtherRESCUE THOSE INCGrace Episcopal Church: $82,000 · OtherSt Andrews Day Care and School: $75,000 · OtherWounded Warriors: $70,000 · Other+14 more: $265,500 · Other+14 moreFOSTERING HOPE INC: $465,000 · Human ServicesFOSTERING HOPE INCJOHN 316 MISSION: $105,000 · Human ServicesJOHN 316 MISSIONSHINE JOPLIN: $70,000 · Human ServicesSHINE JOPLINFOR HIS GLORY HOUSES INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $155,000 · EducationHILLSDALE C…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $80,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SIL…OCPAC FOUNDATION: $45,000 · EducationOCPAC FOUND…The Foundation for Tulsa Schools: $25,000 · EducationThe Foundat…+1 more: $10,000 · EducationIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $60,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $40,500 · ReligionST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100,000 · HealthALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $90,000 · Civil RightsTEENS EXCELLING BEYOND FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentOklahoma Youth Exposition Inc: $1,750 · Youth Development
Other$1,740,500Human Services$665,000Education$315,000Religion$100,500Health$100,000Civil Rights$90,000Youth Development$21,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOSTERING HOPE INC: $465,000 over 5y, 32% of budgetGOSPEL RESCUE MISSION INC: $350,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $155,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN 316 MISSION: $105,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $90,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHINE JOPLIN: $70,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $60,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOCPAC FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $40,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOR HIS GLORY HOUSES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetThe Foundation for Tulsa Schools: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTEENS EXCELLING BEYOND FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma Youth Exposition Inc: $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOSTERING HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds GOSPEL RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds JOHN 316 MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHINE JOPLIN ↗
  • Who funds IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds OCPAC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOR HIS GLORY HOUSES INC ↗
  • Who funds The Foundation for Tulsa Schools ↗
  • Who funds TEENS EXCELLING BEYOND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Youth Exposition Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ron and Carole Woods Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ron and Carole Woods Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    7get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ron and Carole Woods Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ron and Carole Woods Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ron and Carole Woods’ filings →

    More from the funding graph