Skip to content

· Private foundation

Roles Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$366k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$628kFood & Nutrition$342kInternational$226kHuman Services$178kArts & Culture$128kPhilanthropy$119kReligion$93kCivil Rights$51kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $265k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
$14,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOSANNA CHURCH$85,000
CONVOY OF HOPE$30,000
FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN$28,000
ST DAVID'S CENTER$26,000
MN WISHES AND MORE$19,000
LIFEWORKS$16,000
HOPEKIDS$15,000
NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION$15,000
MCKENNA CLAIRE FOUNDATION$15,000
AFRICAN CHILDREN TODAY$14,860
HOUSING FIRST MN FOUNDATION$14,000
OPERATION UNDERGROUND RAILROAD (OUR)$14,000
BEST BUDDIES$12,000
FRASER$12,000
PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $276k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MN WISHES AND MORE: $19k → 7%ABILITY TREE INC: $5k → 8%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 14%MN WISHES AND MORE: $19k → 7%IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA: $8k → 17%MN WISHES AND MORE: $17k → 7%IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA: $5k → 17%WISHES AND MORE: $15k → 7%IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA: $5k → 17%WISHES AND MORE: $10k → 7%WISHES AND MORE: $5k → 7%PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%PINKEY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $12k → 11%PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%FRASER: $15k → 11%FRASER: $14k → 11%FRASER: $14k → 11%FRASER: $12k → 11%FRASER: $8k → 11%FRASER: $8k → 11%FRASER: $7k → 11%FRASER: $5k → 11%FRASER: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
IL
WI
NY
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
AR
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Roles Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Roles Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 24 repeat orgs$237k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
19

Total granted

$1.6M
$124k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+15%

Still filing today

75%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalPhilanthropyEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FM
    FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $188k · revenue +83%
  • SD
    ST DAVID'S CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $143k · revenue +35%
  • NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $128k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • FF
    Foundation for Children in Needgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $24k · revenue +54%
  • 2
    2HARVESTORG
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
2
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
3
Children's Miracle Network

Children's miracle network (dba "children's miracle network hospitals") works to save kids' lives by bringing people together to raise money for children's healthcare in local communities.

Unclassified
4
Special Forces Foundation

The special forces foundation provides immediate and ongoing support to the special forces community and their families.

Philanthropy
5
Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc

Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

—
6
The National Fragile X Foundation

The national fragile x foundation serves the entire fragile x community to live their best lives by providing the knowledge, resources, and tools until, and even after, more effective treatments and a cure are achieved.

Health
7
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
8
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
9
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services
12
Children's Tumor Foundation

Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope; the most unlike its peers is Haven Acres. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/35
Grantees still filing
24/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOSANNA CHURCH: $85,000 · OtherHOSANNA CHURCHMCKENNA CLAIRE FOUNDATION: $70,000 · OtherMCKENNA CLAIRE FOUNDATIONTHE C4 FOUNDATION: $63,000 · OtherTHE C4 FOUNDATIONOPERATION UNDERGROUND RAILROAD (OUR): $46,000 · OtherOPERATION UNDERGROUND RAILROAD (OU…LIFEWORKS: $40,000 · OtherLIFEWORKSHOUSING FIRST MN FOUNDATION: $38,000 · OtherHOUSING FIRST MN FOUNDATIONTAYA AND CHRIS KYLE FOUNDATION SERVICE FAMILY STRONG: $30,000 · OtherTHE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND: $37,500 · OtherTHE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUNDSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $22,000 · Other+22 more: $150,928 · Other+22 moreFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $188,000 · InternationalFEED MY STARVING CHILD…CONVOY OF HOPE: $120,909 · InternationalCONVOY OF HOPEBest Buddies International Inc: $54,500 · InternationalBest Buddies Internati…Foundation for Children in Need: $23,500 · InternationalFoundation for Childre…FRASER: $87,000 · Human ServicesFRASERWISHES & MORE: $85,000 · Human ServicesWISHES & MOREPINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $71,000 · Human ServicesPINKY SWEAR FOUN…IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $17,500 · Human ServicesIRAQ AND AFGHANI…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 · Human Services+2 more: $5,500 · Human ServicesHOPEKIDS INC: $110,000 · HealthHOPEKIDS INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $80,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDRE…SIEGEL RARE NEUROIMMUNE ASSOCIATION: $59,000 · HealthSIEGEL RARE NEU…FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH NEUROIMMUNE DISORDERS INC: $12,000 · Health+2 more: $11,000 · HealthAfrican Children Today Inc: $147,640 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,500 · EducationST DAVID'S CENTER: $143,000 · Youth DevelopmentNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $127,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$582,428International$386,909Human Services$276,000Health$272,000Education$153,140Youth Development$143,000Arts & Culture$127,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $188,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAfrican Children Today Inc: $147,640 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetST DAVID'S CENTER: $143,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $127,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHOPEKIDS INC: $110,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetFRASER: $87,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWISHES & MORE: $85,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $80,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $71,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSIEGEL RARE NEUROIMMUNE ASSOCIATION: $59,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $54,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND: $37,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTAYA AND CHRIS KYLE FOUNDATION SERVICE FAMILY STRONG: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFoundation for Children in Need: $23,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUNT OF A LIFETIME: $17,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetIRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $14,428 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH NEUROIMMUNE DISORDERS INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSOURIINC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONEOC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPANDAS NETWORKORG: $6,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCOURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIVING BACK OUTDOORS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCTNNB1 Connect and Cure Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE ARC MINNESOTA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetABILITY TREE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHaven Acres: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTOUGH LIKE TIGHE: $1,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds African Children Today Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST DAVID'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds HOPEKIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRASER ↗
  • Who funds WISHES & MORE ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SIEGEL RARE NEUROIMMUNE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND ↗
  • Who funds TAYA AND CHRIS KYLE FOUNDATION SERVICE FAMILY STRONG ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Children in Need ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds HUNT OF A LIFETIME ↗
  • Who funds IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH NEUROIMMUNE DISORDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSOURIINC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds ONEOC ↗
  • Who funds PANDAS NETWORKORG ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Richard M Schulze Family FoundationMN16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Pohlad Family Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Minneapolis Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · AbbVie Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roles Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roles Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Roles Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph