Skip to content

· Public charity

Role Model Movement Inc (NFP)

To inspire youth, empower communities and build a better world one block at a time.

$210k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Community Improvement$754kYouth Development$243kHuman Services$105kArts & Culture$73kRecreation & Sports$58kFood & Nutrition$41kHealth$25kCivil Rights$21kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $93,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $209,730 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $116,230 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$5,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Gifted Hands Hair Creations LLC$7,500
Life Through A Lens$6,200
Absolute Athletics$6,000
1700 East 85th Block Club$6,000
600 Block of Drake Ave Block Club Party$5,800
The 46th Street Block Club & Community Garden$5,800
Lotus Neighbors for Action$5,800
Evans Elite Block Club$5,600
7600 S Chappel Ave Block Club$5,600
1000-1100 N Monticello Block Club$5,600
ChiLOVe$5,600
6500-6559 S Mozart Community Block Club$5,600
77th King Drive Block Club$5,600
74th and Indiana Block Club$5,600
1000 N Harding$5,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Springboard to Success: $5k → 14%Hustle Mommies: $5k → 14%Adams Block Club 5500: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$382k · 24 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +394% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
151

Total granted

$382k
$990k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+394%
+30%

Still filing today

8%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    Gifted Hands Hair Creation LLC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $36k
  • IH
    IN HIS HANDS RESOURCE CENTER INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $26k
  • TO
    THINK OUTSIDE DA BLOCK INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $25k · revenue +394%

Funded once

  • TC
    The Critical Thinking Child LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • C
    CHRISTIANAIRE
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • PA
    Pullman Arts
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Cred Inc
Employment
2
Igniting Minds Inc

Igniting Minds works to close the educational and nutritional gaps that contribute to generational poverty in Chicago through academic enrichment, workforce development, food insecurity programming, and cultural exchange.

—
3
Hoop Dreams- Live-Learn-Hoop

Hoop dreams aims to empower and expose youth from underserved communities to uplifting experiences. We strengthen participants social and interpersonal skills through various enrichment programs

Recreation & Sports
4
Project Love Chicago

Project LOVE Chicago strives to break the cycle of poverty decrease violent crimes and increase youth academic outcomes. We do this by providing academic athletic and professional resources to vulnerable minority populations throughout the…

Education
5
Equality Dream Team

Provide resources and tools to help african american youth from underserved communities aged 14-24 achieve economic sustainability through education, career, and workforce development.

Education
6
Students Run Chicago
Health
7
Yaameens Dream Nfp

The purpose of the organization is the following: To combat poverty, violence and lack of education in underserved and at risk communities in Illinois.

Youth Development
8
Cultures United

Free soccer programing to youth and young adults

Unclassified
9
Chicago Cultural Performing Arts and Media Allianc

To provide outreach services and resources

Arts & Culture
10
Cleveland Freedom Project

Youth-led Cultivators

Youth Development
11
Urban Male Network

Urban Male Network is a nationally recognized organization dedicated to uplifting young men from urban communities through mentorship, education, and service. By redefining the image of the urban male, the network fosters leadership,…

Youth Development
12
I Am My Brothers Keeper Unity Day

Violence Prevention in Chicago

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dream Academy Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Herrendorf Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 178 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/34
Grantees still filing
21/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+150 more: $1,165,482 · Other+150 moreTHINK OUTSIDE DA BLOCK INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentBeautiful Beginnings to Lasting Legacies: $15,100 · Youth DevelopmentTGI MOVEMENT: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentMEAN Girls Empowerment: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentProject OneTen: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentRole Model Movement Inc (NFP): $5,777 · Youth DevelopmentA JOURNEY 2 MANHOOD INC: $5,400 · Youth DevelopmentPEACE AND EDUCATION COALITION OF BACK OF THE YARDS NEW CITY: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentLOVE UNITY & VALUES INSTITUTE: $5,000 · Youth Development+2 more: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentPullman Arts: $25,000 · Arts & CultureURBAN WARRIOR YOUTH COMMUNITY: $15,000 · Arts & CultureA PHILIP RANDOLPH PULLMAN PORTER MUSEUM: $15,000 · Arts & CulturePILSEN CENTER FOR CULTURAL AND CONTEMPORARY ARTS: $5,600 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC MEDIA INSTITUTE: $5,000 · Arts & CultureWE ALL CODE: $10,000 · EducationCHAMPS MALE MENTORING PROGRAM - CHIRISE: $10,000 · EducationHerrendorf Family Foundation Inc: $2,000 · EducationKLEO Community Family Life Center: $1,500 · EducationWashington Park Chamber of Commerce: $10,000 · Community ImprovementEnvision Community Services: $5,000 · Community ImprovementHUGS NO SLUGS INC: $1,300 · Community ImprovementADAMS BLOCK CLUB 5500: $5,877 · Human ServicesSPRINGBOARD TO SUCCESS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHustle Mommies: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY BUILDERS INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterLA CASA NORTE: $2,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,165,482Youth Development$95,277Arts & Culture$65,600Education$23,500Community Improvement$16,300Human Services$15,877Housing & Shelter$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHINK OUTSIDE DA BLOCK INC: $25,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetA PHILIP RANDOLPH PULLMAN PORTER MUSEUM: $15,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetWE ALL CODE: $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetWashington Park Chamber of Commerce: $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTGI MOVEMENT: $10,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetMEAN Girls Empowerment: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetCHAMPS MALE MENTORING PROGRAM - CHIRISE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetRole Model Movement Inc (NFP): $5,777 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY BUILDERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC MEDIA INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSPRINGBOARD TO SUCCESS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEnvision Community Services: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHustle Mommies: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLOVE UNITY & VALUES INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEDGEWATER CASTLE FOOTBALL CLUB: $3,500 over 1y, 18% of budgetDREAM ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetTHE PUERTO RICAN HIGH SCHOOL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA CASA NORTE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHerrendorf Family Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDIONS CHICAGO DREAM INC NFP: $1,700 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKLEO Community Family Life Center: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLADIES OF VIRTUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THINK OUTSIDE DA BLOCK INC ↗
  • Who funds Pullman Arts ↗
  • Who funds Beautiful Beginnings to Lasting Legacies ↗
  • Who funds URBAN WARRIOR YOUTH COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds A PHILIP RANDOLPH PULLMAN PORTER MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Metropolitan Chicago IncIL18.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Allies for Community Business Inc · Robert R McCormick Foundation · University of Chicago Medical Center · Grow Greater Englewood Inc · Field Foundation of Illinois · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Crossroads Fund Inc · Chicago Foundation for Women · The Joyce Foundation · Chicago Beyond Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Role Model Movement Inc (NFP) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Role Model Movement Inc (NFP). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • The Community Builders Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 178 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Role Model Movement Inc (NFP)’s filings →

More from the funding graph