Skip to content
Rogers Memorial Hospital Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Rogers Memorial Hospital Inc

Our vision:we envision a future where people have the tools to rise above the challenges of mental illness, addiction, and stigma to lead healthy lives.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$16MPhilanthropy$81kArts & Culture$53kPublic Safety & Disaster$45kEducation$16kHousing & Shelter$10kHuman Services$6kReligion$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $301,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,567,427 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,266,427 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$648M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MENTAL HEALTH EMERGENCY CENTER INC$250,000
ADAA$20,000
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATE OF EATING DISORDER PROFESSIONALS FOUNDATION INC$10,000
INTERNATIONAL OCD FOUNDATION$7,500
JOURNEY21 INC$7,500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN WISCONSIN INC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 1% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MULTI-SERVICE EATING DISORDERS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 8%MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION FOR CHILDREN'S MENTAL HEALTH: $7k → 14%ONE MIND INSTITUTE: $25k → 9%THE MILE HALL FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%ALLIANCE FOR EATING DISORDER: $10k → 11%THE SHUL: $5k → 15%4TH DIMENSION SOBRIETY: $13k → 5%PLYMOUTH ADVANCEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $5k → 9%FRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC: $8k → 10%MILWAUKEE FILM INC: $10k → 17%EXCHANGE EVENTS INC DBA GLOBAL EXCHANGE EXHIBIT: $6k → 9%ADAA: $20k → 4%NTL ASSOC OF ANOREXIA NERVOSA & ASSOC DISORDERS: $9k → 7%NTL ASSOC OF ANOREXIA NERVOSA & ASSOC DISORDERS: $10k → 14%AUTISM SPEAKS INC: $5k → 11%MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $250k → 9%THE VOICES PROJECT INC: $10k → 13%UNITED WAY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC: $20k → 8%MULTI-SERVICE EATING DISORDERS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 8%WISCONSIN ASSOCIATION OF SOBER HOUSING: $10k → 5%MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $25k → 9%THE OVERTURE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 10%MILWAUKEE FILM INC: $10k → 17%INTERNATIONAL OCD FOUNDATION: $40k → 9%NAMI SOUTHEAST WISCONSIN INC: $5k → 5%UNITED WAY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC: $10k → 9%THE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%NAMI WAUKESHA: $5k → 5%RIGHTWAY CLUB INC: $10k → 9%MILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 17%WISHOPE INC: $5k → 5%ROGERS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $3.8M → 5%KATHY'S HOUSE: $15k → 17%ROGERS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $3.0M → 5%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $6k → 17%ROGERS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $2.7M → 5%WISHOPE INC: $18k → 17%ROGERS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $2.2M → 5%ROGERS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $1.4M → 5%ROGERS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONINC: $1.1M → 5%ROGERS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $1.0M → 5%VILLAGE OF SUMMIT POLICE DEPARTMENT: $37k → 5%OCONOMOWOC AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $10k → 5%OCD WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $10k → 5%OCD WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $8k → 5%JOURNEY21 INC: $8k → 5%VILLAGE OF SUMMIT POLICE DEPARTMENT: $7k → 5%YOUR CHOICE-LIVE INC: $8k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MA
NV
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 14 repeat orgs$234k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
25

Total granted

$16M
$211k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+7%

Still filing today

86%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH EMERGENCY CENTER INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $500k · revenue +63%
  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $275k · revenue +63%
  • IO
    International OCD Foundation Inc
    4× · 2020–2024 · $110k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • OM
    ONE MIND
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -11%
  • KH
    Kathy's House Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -47%
  • 4th Dimension Sobriety Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue +40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nami Wisconsin Inc

The mission of nami wisconsin is to improve the quality of life of people affected by mental illness and promote recovery.

—
2
Nami Greater Milwaukee Inc

Improving the lives of those with mental illness.

—
3
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—
4
Michigan Psychiatric Society

Mission is to represent the interests and professional needs of psychiatric physicians in michigan while striving to ensure quality care for people with mental disorders and their families through promotion of education, research and…

—
5
Mental Health Systems Inc

To improve the lives of individuals, families, and communities impacted by substance abuse and behavioral health disorders.

Health
6
Wisconsin Meaningful Alternatives Inc

Break down barriers that keep people from living full and meaningful lives. Thr organization does this by building authentic human connections, advocating with the people we support and creating opportunities for holistic and lasting…

Health
7
Nami National

NAMI provides advocacy, education, support and public awareness so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness can build better lives.See Schedule O

Health
8
Alliance On Mental Illness of Racine County Inc

The alliance on mental illness of racine county, inc is a nonprofit organization working to improve the quality of life through support, education, and advocacy for all individuals affectd by mental illness

—
9
Interact of Michigan Inc

Interact of michigan, inc. is dedicated to collaborative delivery of evidence-supported mental health and substance abuse treatments that foster hope and wellness. interact of michigan, inc. has developed services designed to meet the…

—
10
Mental Health & Addiction Advocacy Coalition

The mission of the mental health & addiction advocacy coalition is to unify diverse local voices to advocate with the goals of (i) increasing awareness of issues that impact people affected by mental illness and addiction disorders;…

Health
11
Nami Illinois Inc

Nami illinois is dedicated to improving the quality of life for people with mental health disorders and their families through support, education, and advocacy.

Health
12
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rightway Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/35
Grantees still filing
18/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROGERS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $15,187,000 · HealthROGERS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC+16 more: $790,500 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $275,000 · OtherVILLAGE OF SUMMIT POLICE DEPARTMENT: $44,688 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ANOREXIA NERVOSA AND ASSOCIATED DISORDERS INC: $19,000 · OtherOCD - WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 · Other+8 more: $72,500 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $41,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC: $30,000 · Philanthropy4th Dimension Sobriety Inc: $13,000 · PhilanthropyMILWAUKEE FILM INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureOVERTURE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureGerman Christmas Market of Oconomow: $5,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureJOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ARTS CENTER INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureJourney 21 Inc: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterMILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $5,775 · EducationPLYMOUTH ADVANCEMENT ASSOCIATION LEE GENTINE: $5,000 · Community ImprovementMILWAUKEE PRIDE INC: $5,000 · Civil Rights
Health$15,977,500Other$428,688Philanthropy$84,000Arts & Culture$52,500Housing & Shelter$7,500Education$5,775Community Improvement$5,000Civil Rights$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROGERS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $15,187,000 over 8y, 51% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH EMERGENCY CENTER INC: $500,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $275,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetInternational OCD Foundation Inc: $109,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetANXIETY AND DEPRESSION ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $45,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $41,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetONE MIND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWishope Inc: $23,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetMILWAUKEE FILM INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ANOREXIA NERVOSA AND ASSOCIATED DISORDERS INC: $19,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetKathy's House Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget4th Dimension Sobriety Inc: $13,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMulti-Service Eating Disorders Associations Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetRIGHTWAY CLUB INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR EATING DISORDERS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOVERTURE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI SOUTHEAST WISCONSIN INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMOBILIZE RECOVERY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJourney 21 Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYOUR CHOICE TO LIVE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA ASSOCIATION FOR CHILDREN'S MENTAL HEALTH: $6,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $5,775 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEXCHANGE EVENTS INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPLYMOUTH ADVANCEMENT ASSOCIATION LEE GENTINE: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE MILES HALL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PRIDE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGerman Christmas Market of Oconomow: $5,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetTHE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ARTS CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers Fou…Baird Foundation IncGreater Milwaukee Fou…United Way of Greater…Waukesha County Commu…Cedar Street Charitab…Alliant Energy Founda…Wilbert & Genevieve S…Oconomowoc Area Found…AbbVie FoundationJoseph and Vera Zilbe…Herbert H Kohl Charit…
Green Bay Packers FoundationWI24× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Waukesha County Community Foundation · Cedar Street Charitable Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Wilbert & Genevieve Schauer Foundatation Inc · Oconomowoc Area Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rogers Memorial Hospital Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rogers Memorial Hospital Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rogers Memorial Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home