· Public charity
Rogers Memorial Hospital Inc
Our vision:we envision a future where people have the tools to rise above the challenges of mental illness, addiction, and stigma to lead healthy lives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $301,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,567,427 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,266,427 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MENTAL HEALTH EMERGENCY CENTER INC | $250,000 |
| ADAA | $20,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATE OF EATING DISORDER PROFESSIONALS FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| JOURNEY21 INC | $7,500 |
| INTERNATIONAL OCD FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN WISCONSIN INC | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 1% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MHMENTAL HEALTH EMERGENCY CENTER INC2× · 2022–2024 · $500k · revenue +37%
- MHMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC2× · 2022–2023 · $275k · revenue +63%
- IOInternational OCD Foundation Inc4× · 2020–2024 · $110k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- OMONE MINDone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -11%
- KHKathy's House Incone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -47%
4th Dimension Sobriety Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue +40%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of nami wisconsin is to improve the quality of life of people affected by mental illness and promote recovery.
Improving the lives of those with mental illness.
Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.
Mission is to represent the interests and professional needs of psychiatric physicians in michigan while striving to ensure quality care for people with mental disorders and their families through promotion of education, research and…
To improve the lives of individuals, families, and communities impacted by substance abuse and behavioral health disorders.
Break down barriers that keep people from living full and meaningful lives. Thr organization does this by building authentic human connections, advocating with the people we support and creating opportunities for holistic and lasting…
NAMI provides advocacy, education, support and public awareness so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness can build better lives.See Schedule O
The alliance on mental illness of racine county, inc is a nonprofit organization working to improve the quality of life through support, education, and advocacy for all individuals affectd by mental illness
Interact of michigan, inc. is dedicated to collaborative delivery of evidence-supported mental health and substance abuse treatments that foster hope and wellness. interact of michigan, inc. has developed services designed to meet the…
The mission of the mental health & addiction advocacy coalition is to unify diverse local voices to advocate with the goals of (i) increasing awareness of issues that impact people affected by mental illness and addiction disorders;…
Nami illinois is dedicated to improving the quality of life for people with mental health disorders and their families through support, education, and advocacy.
Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rightway Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROGERS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH EMERGENCY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds International OCD Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ONE MIND ↗
- Who funds Wishope Inc ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE FILM INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ANOREXIA NERVOSA AND ASSOCIATED DISORDERS INC ↗
- Who funds Kathy's House Inc ↗
- Who funds 4th Dimension Sobriety Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR EATING DISORDERS INC ↗
- Who funds OVERTURE CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RIGHTWAY CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI SOUTHEAST WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds Multi-Service Eating Disorders Associations Inc ↗
- Who funds MOBILIZE RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds Journey 21 Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUR CHOICE TO LIVE INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION FOR CHILDREN'S MENTAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EXCHANGE EVENTS INC ↗
- Who funds PLYMOUTH ADVANCEMENT ASSOCIATION LEE GENTINE ↗
- Who funds THE MILES HALL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
- Who funds German Christmas Market of Oconomow ↗
- Who funds THE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE PRIDE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Waukesha County Community Foundation · Cedar Street Charitable Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Wilbert & Genevieve Schauer Foundatation Inc · Oconomowoc Area Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rogers Memorial Hospital Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.