Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rogers Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$44kHuman Services$6kPublic Benefit$3kHealth$2kArts & Culture$2kInternational$2kCrime & Legal$1kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$185k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$2,200
DODGE CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTER INC$1,000
PORTERFIELD BAPTIST CHURCH$1,000
ROSS KELLY FOUNDATION$1,000
ORPHANS CEMETERY ASSOC$500
BRUISED REED MINISTRIES$500
DODGE BAPTIST ASSOCIATION$500
GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL$500
REFUGE HOUSE FOR LADIES INC$500
Individual grant recipient$500
DODGE ARTS GUILD INC$100
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JACK GRAHAM MINISTRIES: $500 → 5%WALL BUILDERS: $500 → 8%ROSS KELLY FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%CHARLES CAPPS MININSTRIES: $500 → 12%FAMILY LIFE CHURCH: $500 → 17%FAITH LIFE CHURCH: $500 → 14%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $1k → 15%GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL: $500 → 14%MARIO MURILLO MINISTRIES: $500 → 15%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1k → 21%BRIGHTON THEIR DAY: $500 → 8%CREFLO DOLLAR MINISTRIES: $500 → 13%CAMPUS OUTREACH: $600 → 18%PORTERFIELD BAPTIST CHURCH: $1k → 23%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $6k → 24%COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL: $500 → 9%LOTTIE MOON CHRISTMAS OFFERING: $500 → 9%CHARLES CAPPS MININSTRIES: $500 → 12%FAMILY LIFE CHURCH: $500 → 17%FAITH LIFE CHURCH: $500 → 14%GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL: $500 → 14%CREFLO DOLLAR MINISTRIES: $500 → 13%FRIENDS OF PRUITT: $3k → 24%LOTTIE MOON CHRISTMAS OFFERING: $500 → 9%CHARLES CAPPS MININSTRIES: $500 → 12%FAITH LIFE CHURCH: $500 → 14%GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL: $500 → 14%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $2k → 24%GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL: $500 → 14%DODGE CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTER INC: $1k → 24%GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL: $500 → 14%REFUGE HOUSE FOR LADIES INC: $1k → 24%GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL: $500 → 14%THE REFUGE CHURCH: $1k → 24%DODGE CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTER INC: $1k → 24%CHRISTINA HINZ: $1k → 24%REFUGE HOUSE FOR LADIES INC: $1k → 24%DODGE CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTER INC: $1k → 24%DODGE CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTER INC: $1k → 24%THE REFUGE CHURCH: $1k → 24%DODGE ARTS GUILD INC: $1k → 24%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $1k → 24%DODGE BAPTIST ASSOCIATION: $1k → 24%DODGE COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 24%DODGE CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTER INC: $1k → 24%DODGE ARTS GUILD INC: $800 → 24%DODGE BAPTIST ASSOCIATION: $500 → 24%REFUGE HOUSE FOR LADIES INC: $500 → 24%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

CA
CO
MO
VA
AR
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$47k · 19 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
13

Total granted

$47k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
0%

Still filing today

11%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DODGE CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +73%
  • RH
    REFUGE HOUSE FOR LADIES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +16%
  • Compassion International Incorporated
    2× · 2017–2021 · $728 · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +32%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Safe Haven Counseling Associates in

Biblical counseling

2
Refuge for Prodigals International Bible Ministries Inc
Religion
3
Divine Healing Ministries of Ga

It is a ministry of God focused on teaching the Word of God to the people.

Health
4
Life Training Ministries Inc

Christian counseling for individuals with anxiety depression or other emotional struggles. Christian counseling for marriages and other couples.

Human Services
5
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
6
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

7
Boston Center for Biblical Counseling
Philanthropy
8
The Rock Ministries

To preach the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ to the Nations

Human Services
9
Repairing the Breach Ministries Inc
Religion
10
Faithbytheword Incorporated

As Christs followers, we have the Holy Spirit residing within us, which means we have His power to fulfill this command. We cant save anyone, but its our responsibility to tell people about the God who can. How will they believe unless…

Human Services
11
Redeemed Christian Church of God

To strengthen marriages and families, to encourage Christian fellowship as we evangelize the lost around us and minister to the needy with the resources God has blessed us.

Religion
12
Bibles and Bikes
Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bruised Reed Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is Orphans Cemetery Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH — $9,900 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $5,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientREFUGE HOUSE FOR LADIES INC — $4,000 · OtherREFUGE HOUSE FOR LADIES INCDODGE BAPTIST ASSOCIATION — $3,500 · OtherDODGE BAPTIST ASSOCIATIONGIDEONS INTERNATIONAL — $3,000 · OtherGIDEONS INTERNATIONALIndividual grant recipient — $2,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE REFUGE CHURCH — $2,000 · OtherDODGE ARTS GUILD INC — $1,900 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILY — $1,740 · Other+21 more — $17,400 · Other+21 moreDODGE CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTER INC — $5,000 · ReligionDODGE CHRISTI…SAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S P…BRUISED REED MINISTRIES INC — $500 · ReligionBRUISED REED …TURNING POINT COUNSELING INC — $500 · ReligionTURNING POINT…WALLBUILDER PRESENTATIONS INC — $500 · ReligionWALLBUILDER P…FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentCompassion International Incorporated — $728 · InternationalLEAVE IT BETTER INC — $500 · Community Improvement
Other$51,740Religion$7,500Youth Development$1,000International$728Community Improvement$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDODGE CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTER INC — $5,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetREFUGE HOUSE FOR LADIES INC — $4,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated — $728 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRUISED REED MINISTRIES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetORPHANS CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INC — $500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTURNING POINT COUNSELING INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWALLBUILDER PRESENTATIONS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DODGE CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTER INC
  • Who funds REFUGE HOUSE FOR LADIES INC
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated
  • Who funds LEAVE IT BETTER INC
  • Who funds BRUISED REED MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds ORPHANS CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds TURNING POINT COUNSELING INC
  • Who funds WALLBUILDER PRESENTATIONS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rogers Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph