Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rogers Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$613k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.1MArts & Culture$806kHuman Services$549kYouth Development$499kAnimals$369kRecreation & Sports$325kCommunity Improvement$243kFood & Nutrition$240kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k28 grants · $531k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LINCOLN CHILDREN'S ZOO$50,000
FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN$40,000
NEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIE$30,000
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP$30,000
LINCOLN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$30,000
UNL FOUNDATION - UNL STATE MUSEUM$26,000
LINCOLN BASEBALL ASSOCIATION$25,000
FOUNDATION FOR LINCOLN PUBLIC SCHOO$25,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$25,000
CENTER POINTE$20,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF LINCOLN$20,000
NEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FDTN$20,000
CROHN'S & COLITIS FDN$20,000
CHILDREN'S NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$20,000
BRAVEBE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $327k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HETRA - HEARTLAND EQUINE THERAPEUTI: $10k → 6%LIFELINE PILOTS: $8k → 14%LIFELINE PILOTS: $8k → 14%LIFELINE INC: $8k → 14%CHRISTIAN HERITAGE: $5k → 13%THE GOODNEIGHBOR COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 13%GOOD NEIGHBOR COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 13%GOOD NEIGHBOR COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 13%THE GOODNEIGHBOR COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 13%CEDARS HOME OF CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $30k → 13%CEDARS HOME OF CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $30k → 13%LIGHTHOUSE: $17k → 13%LIGHTHOUSE: $17k → 13%LIGHTHOUSE: $16k → 13%LIGHTHOUSE: $16k → 13%LIGHTHOUSE: $15k → 13%CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $13k → 13%CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $13k → 13%CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $11k → 13%CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $10k → 13%CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $10k → 13%CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $10k → 13%CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $10k → 13%CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $9k → 13%CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $8k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.7M · 70 repeat orgs$444k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

70 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

70
31

Total granted

$4.7M
$378k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+1%

Still filing today

56%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $235k · revenue +25%
  • TM
    THE MADONNA FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $140k · revenue +87%
  • LC
    LINCOLN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • WC
    WILLARD COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -10%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • UF
    UNL FOUNDATION - BIG RED SATELLITE
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Educare of Lincoln Inc

To help young children thrive socially, emotionally and academically through high-quality early childhood education, and in partnership with their families and the community.

Education
2
Lincoln County Community Development Corporation

To promote, facilitate and develop or co-develop affordable housing in lincoln county, nebraska.

Philanthropy
3
Lincoln Central Neighborhood Family Center

To provide programs for the residents in the lincoln/central school area.

Community Improvement
4
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
5
Nebraska Alliance of Child Advocacy Centers

To enhance nebraska's response to child abuse.

Crime & Legal
6
Lincoln Chamber of Commerce

Community development in lincoln, ne

—
7
Lutheran Family Services of Ne Inc

Lutheran family services of nebraska, inc.'s (lfs) mission is to express god's love for all people by providing quality human care services that build and strengthen individual, family and community life. our vision is saftey, hope and…

Human Services
8
Central Lincoln County Ambulance Service Inc

Providing advanced life service level support for nine local communities in lincoln county including damariscotta, newcastle, bremen, bristol, south bristol, nobleboro, jefferson and edgecomb

Health
9
Lincoln Medical Education Partnership

To provide family practice training and, in support of that end, relevant healthcare education and services.

—
10
Lincoln University Aka Lincoln College

Lincoln college uniquely empowers students to realize their full potential

Education
11
Lincoln Land Community College Foundation

Cultivating and stewarding charitable gifts to support lincoln land community college students, programs and services.

Philanthropy
12
Jefferson Community Health Center Inc

Inspiring healthy living by providing exceptional health and life services for every person, every time.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nebraska Children & Families Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Sewing for Babies Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/53
Grantees still filing
35/53
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $185,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIPNEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES: $140,000 · OtherCEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN: $105,000 · OtherFRESH START INC: $100,000 · OtherUNIV OF NE STATE MUSEUM: $100,000 · OtherLINCOLN BASEBALL ASSOCIATION INC: $120,000 · OtherBRIGHT LIGHTS INC: $113,000 · OtherLINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $115,000 · Other+62 more: $1,803,488 · Other+62 moreThe Tabitha Foundation Inc: $200,000 · HealthThe Tabitha Foun…ANGELS AMONG US: $105,000 · HealthANGELS AMONG USBryan Foundation: $75,000 · HealthBryan FoundationMILKWORKS INC: $72,500 · HealthMILKWORKS INCCLINIC WITH A HEART INC: $63,000 · HealthCLINIC WITH A HE…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $60,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISE…SAINT ELIZABETH FOUNDATION: $40,000 · HealthSAINT ELIZABETH …CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $40,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPI…HOPESPOKE: $35,000 · Health+3 more: $42,500 · Health+3 moreFRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC: $113,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHI…CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $92,800 · Human ServicesCASA FOR …LIGHTHOUSE: $81,000 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUS…THE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Human ServicesTHE CEDAR…GOOD NEIGHBOR COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesGOOD NEIG…LIFELINE INC: $23,500 · Human ServicesLIFELINE …+2 more: $15,000 · Human ServicesLINCOLN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $140,000 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN C…THE FOUNDATION FOR LINCOLN PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $78,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FOUND…MOURNING HOPE: $67,500 · Arts & CultureMOURNING …LUX CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $65,000 · Arts & CultureLUX CENTE…Nebraska Brass Inc: $49,000 · Arts & CultureNebraska …MINDEN OPERA HOUSE INC: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN CHILDREN'S ZOO: $265,000 · AnimalsCAPITAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $30,000 · Animals+1 more: $5,800 · AnimalsTHE MADONNA FOUNDATION: $140,000 · PhilanthropyNEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $90,000 · PhilanthropyAUTISM ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $35,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $7,500 · PhilanthropyFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC: $235,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,781,488Health$733,000Human Services$440,300Arts & Culture$416,500Animals$300,800Philanthropy$272,500Food & Nutrition$240,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLINCOLN CHILDREN'S ZOO: $265,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC: $235,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetThe Tabitha Foundation Inc: $200,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetTHE MADONNA FOUNDATION: $140,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetLINCOLN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $140,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetNEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES: $140,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetLINCOLN BASEBALL ASSOCIATION INC: $120,000 over 5y, 53% of budgetLINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $115,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC: $113,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetBRIGHT LIGHTS INC: $113,000 over 8y, 5.6% of budgetANGELS AMONG US: $105,000 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetFRESH START INC: $100,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetCASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY: $92,800 over 9y, 5.4% of budgetNEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE: $81,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR LINCOLN PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $78,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetBryan Foundation: $75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMILKWORKS INC: $72,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetMOURNING HOPE: $67,500 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF LINCOLN INC: $67,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetLUX CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $65,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetCLINIC WITH A HEART INC: $63,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetTHE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRABBLE MILL: $58,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetGOOD NEIGHBOR COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $55,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCITY IMPACT: $54,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetNebraska Brass Inc: $49,000 over 9y, 15% of budgetNebraska Jazz Orchestra Inc: $42,500 over 9y, 6.7% of budgetSAINT ELIZABETH FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPESPOKE: $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAUTISM ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $35,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetLINCOLN LITERACY COUNCIL: $32,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetNEBRASKA HUMANITIES COUNCIL: $32,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCAPITAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLINCOLN ARTS COUNCIL: $30,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetWILLARD COMMUNITY CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLIFELINE INC: $23,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCENTERPOINTE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GROUNDWATER FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER: $17,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINDEN OPERA HOUSE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetCENTER FOR PEOPLE IN NEED: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEARTLAND EQUINE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLA POINTE CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetEASTMONT TOWERS FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHEARTS UNITED FOR ANIMALS: $5,800 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LINCOLN CHILDREN'S ZOO ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC ↗
  • Who funds The Tabitha Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE MADONNA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN BASEBALL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT LIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS AMONG US ↗
  • Who funds FRESH START INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA FOR LANCASTER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR LINCOLN PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds Bryan Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MILKWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds MOURNING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF LINCOLN INC ↗
  • Who funds LUX CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds CLINIC WITH A HEART INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RABBLE MILL ↗
  • Who funds GOOD NEIGHBOR COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY IMPACT ↗
  • Who funds Nebraska Brass Inc ↗
  • Who funds Nebraska Jazz Orchestra Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

D F Dillon FoundationNE70.2× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: D F Dillon Foundation · Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Abel Foundation · Cooper Foundation · Assurity Life Foundation · United Way of Lincoln and Lancaster County · Bettenhausen Family Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Kinder Porter Scott Family Foundation · Pegler Family Foundation · Viking Foundation of Lincoln · Duncan Family Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rogers Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rogers Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rogers Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Rogers Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rogers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph