Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rogers Family Foundation

$2k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Education$723kArts & Culture$17kPublic Benefit$15kHealth$7kReligion$5kHousing & Shelter$1kCrime & Legal$400Environment$300Other$0
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Sansum Clinic$1,000
Santa Barbara Education Foundation$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $500 → 7%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE: $2k → 8%SPIRIT ROCK MEDITATION CENTER: $5k → 8%SYCAMORE VALLEY PTA: $100 → 9%CSU CHANNEL ISLANDS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%CALLING ALL ANGELS USA: $200 → 10%The Rape Foundation: $250 → 14%PUBLICSQUARE: $8k → 14%The Voter Participation Center: $4k → 14%OREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC: $1k → 13%Ojai Valley School: $1k → 10%The Rape Foundation: $150 → 14%PUBLICSQUARE: $4k → 14%Ojai Valley School: $500 → 10%LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $6k → 14%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SOUTHERN SANTA BARBARA: $1k → 14%LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $6k → 14%HOPE SCHOOL PTA: $200 → 14%NEW VILLAGE GIRLS ACADEMY: $250 → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COAST: $1k → 14%REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $710k → 14%Sansum Clinic: $1k → 14%UCLA Foundation: $2k → 14%THE GRANADA THEATRE: $1k → 14%UCLA Foundation: $250 → 14%Santa Barbara Education Foundation: $1k → 14%ST JAMES' EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $1k → 14%Community Environmental Council: $300 → 14%YOUTH POLICY INSTITUTE INC: $250 → 14%SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF ART: $125 → 14%SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF ART: $125 → 14%MARYMOUNT OF SANTA BARBARA: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

4%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$32k · 7 repeat orgs$732k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
18

Total granted

$32k
$731k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+45%

Still filing today

71%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EducationArts & CultureHealthPublic BenefitCivil RightsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $13k · revenue +28%
  • SC
    SANSUM CLINIC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $5k · revenue +33%
  • OV
    OJAI VALLEY SCHOOL
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • RU
    REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2019 · $710k
  • SR
    SPIRIT ROCK MEDITATION CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • TV
    THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue -34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
2
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
3
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
4
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
5
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
6
Scripps College

To educate women to develop their intellect and talents through active participation in a community of scholars, so that as graduates they may contribute to society through public and private lives of leadership, service, integrity and…

Education
7
Harvey Mudd College

HMC seeks to educate engineers, scientists, and mathematicians well versed in all of these areas and in the humanities, social sciences and the arts so that they may assume leadership in their fields with a clear understanding of the…

Education
8
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
9
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
10
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
11
Marin Academy

Marin academy asks every individual to think, question, and create in an environment of encouragement and compassion, and challenges each person to accept the responsibilities posed by education in a democratic society.

Education
12
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ucla Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Angel Force Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $710,308 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA+10 more: $20,275 · OtherLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $12,800 · Arts & CultureOREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC: $1,120 · Arts & CultureENSEMBLE THEATRE COMPANY OF SANTA BARBARA INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureSANTA BARBARA ART ASSOCIATION: $850 · Arts & CultureThe Riviera Ridge School: $3,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $2,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION: $1,960 · EducationOJAI VALLEY SCHOOL: $1,500 · EducationSanta Barbara Education Foundation: $1,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationWellesley College: $500 · Education+1 more: $250 · EducationSANSUM CLINIC: $5,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COAST: $1,350 · HealthTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $4,000 · Civil RightsCOMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $300 · EnvironmentAngel Force USA: $200 · Public Benefit
Other$730,583Arts & Culture$15,770Education$11,210Health$6,350Civil Rights$4,000Environment$300Public Benefit$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $12,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLICSQUARE INC: $11,175 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetSANSUM CLINIC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $1,960 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOJAI VALLEY SCHOOL: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COAST: $1,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC: $1,120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENSEMBLE THEATRE COMPANY OF SANTA BARBARA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSanta Barbara Education Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA ART ASSOCIATION: $850 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWellesley College: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RAPE FOUNDATION: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Barbara FoundationCA23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Zegar Family Foundation · James S Bower Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rogers Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rogers Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
  • Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rogers Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph