Skip to content

· Private foundation

Roger & Nancy McCabe Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$842k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$813kReligion$263kAnimals$253kHuman Services$226kPhilanthropy$135kEnvironment$110kSocial Science$100kArts & Culture$77kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $207k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $625k
$25,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY$200,000
REVOLVED$200,000
ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY$75,000
MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION$50,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$50,000
WAYZATA COMMUNITY CHURCH$50,000
THE FOLDS OF HONOR MINNESOTA$35,000
MINNESOTANS' MILITARY APPRECIATION FUND$25,000
THE PENFED FOUNDATION$25,000
RISE AND SHINE$25,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$20,000
START READING NOW$20,000
SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND$17,000
FEDERATED FOUNDATION$15,000
A 21 USA INC$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MINNESOTA: $5k → 14%A 21 USA INC: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
IA
CA
VA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 16 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
30

Total granted

$2.5M
$612k

Still filing today

19%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $392k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • M
    Matter
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1.1M
  • DC
    DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $400k · revenue +1%
  • AH
    ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY
    4× · 2020–2025 · $170k

Funded once

  • HC
    Hillsdale College President's Club
    one grant, 2020 · $125k
  • DI
    Dunwoody Institute
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • ML
    Minnesota Landscape Arboretum Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $55k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota State University Student Association Inc

Led by minnesota state university students, we are the inclusive voice for all future, current, and former students. we actively work to represent and support minnesota state university students and advocate at a campus, state, and federal…

Education
2
Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation

Purpose: we inspire, advocate and invest to advance community visions. continued on sch o

Philanthropy
3
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
4
University of Minnesota Foundation

A non-profit organization with the sole purpose of supporting the university of minnesota with a mission to connect passion with possibility, inspire generosity, and support greatness at the university of minnesota.

Education
5
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
6
Minneapolis Saint Paul Regional Economic Development Partnership

The mission of the greater msp partnership is to accelerate regional competitiveness and inclusive economic growth through job creation, capital investment and execution of strategic initiatives. the partnership works to strengthen our…

Community Improvement
7
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
8
Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Mitchell hamline school of law is an independent law school that advances its mission through a combination of legal education, public service, and community engagement. it is dedicated to preparing students to practice law, while also…

Education
9
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
10
University of Minnesota Alumni Association

The university of minnesota alumni association (umaa) fosters a lifelong spirit of belonging and pride by connecting alumni, students, and friends to the university of minnesota and each other. the alumni association advocates for the…

—
11
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

—
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Home Society of Minnesota; the most unlike its peers is Start Reading Now. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Matter: $1,065,399 · OtherMatterREVOLVED: $200,000 · OtherREVOLVEDANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $170,000 · OtherANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETYWayzata Community Church: $164,000 · OtherWayzata Community ChurchHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $150,000 · OtherHillsdale College President's Club: $125,000 · OtherDunwoody Institute: $100,000 · Other+41 more: $910,000 · Other+41 moreDUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $400,000 · EducationDUNWOODY COLLEG…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $40,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER …RISE AND SHINE: $25,000 · EducationStart Reading Now: $20,000 · EducationMINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EnvironmentA21 USA INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MINNESOTA: $9,000 · Human ServicesSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $17,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,884,399Education$485,000Environment$50,000Human Services$24,000Food & Nutrition$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $400,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRISE AND SHINE: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMINNESOTANS' MILITARY APPRECIATION FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $17,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA21 USA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MINNESOTA: $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RISE AND SHINE ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTANS' MILITARY APPRECIATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds Start Reading Now ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds A21 USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · United Way Worldwide · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roger & Nancy McCabe Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roger & Nancy McCabe Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Roger & Nancy McCabe Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Roger & Nancy McCabe Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Roger & Nancy McCabe’s filings →

    More from the funding graph