Skip to content
Rodney B Janes Memorial Fund Xxxxx8005 at a glance

· Private foundation

Rodney B Janes Memorial Fund Xxxxx8005

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$106k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$277kHuman Services$160kPhilanthropy$88kEducation$56kHousing & Shelter$52kPublic Safety & Disaster$52kReligion$50kYouth Development$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$6,989
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROCHESTER SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF$7,499
ARC MONROE COUNTY NYSARC$7,499
ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND AND$7,499
Individual grant recipient$7,499
CANCER ACTION INC$7,499
UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION$7,499
MARY CARIOLA CHILDREN'S CENTER$7,499
CARMELITE MONASTERY$6,989
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$6,989
UNITED WAY OF GREATER$6,989
THE SALVATION ARMY$6,989
AMERICAN RED CROSS ROCHESTER NY$6,989
EPISCOPAL CHURCH HOME FOUNDATION$6,989
HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER$6,989
ROCHESTER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $7k → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $7k → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $6k → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $6k → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$794k · 18 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
0

Total granted

$794k
$0

Still filing today

33%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MARY CARIOLA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue +51%
  • RS
    ROCHESTER SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF
    9× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue +32%
  • CA
    Cancer Action Inc DBA Cancer Support Community Rochester
    9× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue +47%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    7/7
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    MARY CARIOLA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $56,307 · OtherMARY CARIOLA CHILDREN'S CENTER INCIndividual grant recipient: $56,307 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION: $56,307 · OtherUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATIONASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND AND: $56,307 · OtherASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND ANDAMERICAN RED CROSS ROCHESTER NY: $51,888 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS ROCHESTER NYUNITED WAY OF GREATER: $51,888 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREATERTHE SALVATION ARMY: $51,888 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCARMELITE MONASTERY: $50,386 · OtherCARMELITE MONASTERYASSOCIATION FOR THE HELP OF RETARDE: $28,411 · OtherASSOCIATION FOR THE HELP OF RETARDELEND-A-HAND INC: $28,411 · OtherLEND-A-HAND INCARC MONROE COUNTY NYSARC: $27,896 · Other+2 more: $9,500 · OtherCancer Action Inc DBA Cancer Support Community Rochester: $56,307 · HealthCancer Action …SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $51,888 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPI…ROCHESTER SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF: $56,307 · EducationEPISCOPAL CHURCH HOME FOUNDATION INC: $51,888 · Housing & ShelterHILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $51,888 · Human ServicesROCHESTER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $36,000 · Philanthropy
    Other$525,496Health$108,195Education$56,307Housing & Shelter$51,888Human Services$51,888Philanthropy$36,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARY CARIOLA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $56,307 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetROCHESTER SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF: $56,307 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCancer Action Inc DBA Cancer Support Community Rochester: $56,307 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $51,888 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEPISCOPAL CHURCH HOME FOUNDATION INC: $51,888 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetHILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $51,888 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetROCHESTER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $36,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds MARY CARIOLA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds ROCHESTER SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF ↗
    • Who funds Cancer Action Inc DBA Cancer Support Community Rochester ↗
    • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
    • Who funds EPISCOPAL CHURCH HOME FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
    • Who funds ROCHESTER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    United Way of Greater…William & Sheila Kona…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
    United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes IncNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · William & Sheila Konar Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Rodney B Janes Memorial Fund Xxxxx8005 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rodney B Janes Memorial Fund Xxxxx8005. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
    • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rodney B Janes Memorial Fund Xxxxx8005’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home