Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rodger I & Gloria F Daniels Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$228kEducation$38kHuman Services$35kReligion$23kFood & Nutrition$20kAnimals$3kPhilanthropy$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$613k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONE WISH FOUNDATION$10,000
OLEY VALLEY COMMUNITY BENEFIT ASSOCIATION$5,000
BOYERTOWN AREA FIRE AND RESCUE INC$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SUSQUEHANNA SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 12%SUSQUEHANNA SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 12%SUSQUEHANNA SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
AR
TN
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$297k · 16 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
20

Total granted

$297k
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+22%

Still filing today

44%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’23’24
HealthEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $30k · revenue +41%
  • AF
    ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $20k · revenue +100%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $18k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • BA
    BOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • KC
    KIWANIS CLUB OF BOYERTOWN
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
5
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
6
The Jackson Laboratory

The purposes of the laboratory are scientific, medical, charitable, and educational. our mission is to discover precise genomic solutions for disease and empower the biomedical community.

Health
7
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
8
American Lung Association

The american lung association's mission is to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease. we do this through education, advocacy, and research.

Health
9
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
10
Breakthrough T1D

Breakthrough t1d is the leading global t1d organization working to accelerate life-changing breakthroughs to cure, prevent, and treat t1d and its complications.

Health
11
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
12
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alzheimer's Foundation of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Save a Lab Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ALS ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · OtherTHE ALS ASSOCIATIONJDRF EASTERN PA CHAPTER: $40,000 · OtherJDRF EASTERN PA CHAPTERCONCERN INC: $35,000 · OtherCONCERN INCHEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $20,000 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONALBOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $15,000 · OtherBOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTOLEY VALLEY COMMUNITY BENEFIT ASSOCIATION: $12,500 · OtherTRINITARIAN CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $12,000 · OtherKIWANIS CLUB OF BOYERTOWN: $10,000 · OtherNATIONAL PARKINSON FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Other+11 more: $36,000 · Other+11 moreCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $30,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INCALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $20,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA…American Heart Association Inc: $17,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncONE WISH FOUNDATION: $15,000 · HealthONE WISH FOUNDATIONTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $10,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR …AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 · Health+2 more: $3,500 · HealthKEYSTONE SERVICE SYSTEMS INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION FOR BOYERTOWN EDUCATION BOYERTOWN AREA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $7,000 · EducationBROOKESIDE MONTESSORI: $3,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF LAWRENCE ACADEMY AT GROTON MA CORP: $1,500 · EducationDELAWARE VALLEY GOLDEN RETRIEVER: $1,500 · AnimalsSAVE A LAB RESCUE: $1,500 · AnimalsBOYERTOWN AREA FIRE AND RESCUE INC: $2,500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$240,500Health$116,000Human Services$15,000Education$11,500Animals$3,000Public Safety & Disaster$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKEYSTONE SERVICE SYSTEMS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetONE WISH FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR BOYERTOWN EDUCATION BOYERTOWN AREA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BOYERTOWN AREA: $3,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBROOKESIDE MONTESSORI: $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBOYERTOWN AREA MULTI-SERVICE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe diaTribe Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYERTOWN AREA FIRE AND RESCUE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDELAWARE VALLEY GOLDEN RETRIEVER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF LAWRENCE ACADEMY AT GROTON MA CORP: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON LEGAL SERVICES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE A LAB RESCUE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aetna Foundation IncCT12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aetna Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rodger I & Gloria F Daniels Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rodger I & Gloria F Daniels Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Greater Boston Legal Services Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rodger I & Gloria F Daniels’ filings →

More from the funding graph