Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

Rochelle Area Community Foundation

To provide grants to various organizations supporting the arts, education, health and community

$179k
Granted FY2020
13
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$28k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

63% of Rochelle Area Community Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Rochelle Area Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Rochelle Area Community Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $163k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
17
1
19
13
20
2
21
2
22
1
23
4
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Food & Nutrition$148kArts & Culture$75kHuman Services$67kHousing & Shelter$43kYouth Development$30kRecreation & Sports$24kEducation$19kHealth$18kOther$0
02FY2020 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 13 grants below total $163,300 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $179,183 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $15,883 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k4 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $139k
$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROCHELLE CHRISTIAN FOOD PANTRY$27,650
KITCHEN TABLE INC$17,900
FARMWORKER AND LANDSCAPER ADVOCACY PROJECT$17,500
FLAGG-ROCHELLE COMMUNITY PARK DISTRICT$15,000
4-C COMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE$13,900
NORTHERN IL FOOD BANK$12,800
HUB CITY SENIOR CITIZENS INC$12,000
HOPE OF OGLE COUNTY$12,000
LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$10,000
VILLAGE OF PROGRESS INC$8,000
BELIEVE IN THE CHILDREN INC$6,000
ROCHELLE RESCUE MISSION$5,550
SINNISSIPPI CENTERS INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%4-C COMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE: $14k → 13%HOPE OF OGLE COUNTY: $12k → 9%HUB CITY SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $12k → 9%VILLAGE OF PROGRESS INC: $8k → 9%BELIEVE IN THE CHILDREN INC: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$435k · 6 repeat orgs$233k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$435k
$9k

Still filing today

83%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterHealthEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OV
    OTHER VARIOUS GRANTS
    5× · 2017–2023 · $277k
  • RC
    ROCHELLE CHRISTIAN FOOD PANTRY
    2× · 2020–2024 · $43k · revenue -15%
  • RR
    ROCHELLE RESCUE MISSION
    4× · 2019–2024 · $37k · revenue -3%

Funded once

  • CB
    CRESTON BOOSTER CLUB
    one grant, 2019 · $9k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Interchurch Organization Inc

The mission of the henry hosea house is to provide food and nourishment for the bodies and souls of the men, women, and children of the northern kentucky/cincinnati area. we are a cooperative ecumenical nonprofit agency made up of…

Religion
2
Ravenswood Community Services Inc

Ravenswood community services ("rcs") operates a food pantry and community kitchen for those in need of emergency food on chicago's north side.

Human Services
3
The Rochelle Center

To offer meaningful opportunities to adults with disabilities and their families so they may achieve their goals for quality lives and community inclusion.

Employment
4
Roselle Community Food Pantry

Provide food to residents of Roselle, Medinah, and Bloomingdale to those that are in need.

5
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
6
Shalom Center of Interfaith Network of Kenosha County Inc

Programs designed to serve the community's needs including a soup kitchen, family shelter, inns, food pantry, and other services.

Human Services
7
Community Kitchen

Providing food for people who are hungry, conversation for people who are lonely, rest for people who are struggling, and a voice for people in need.

Food & Nutrition
8
Lower Chattahoochee Direct Service

The organization provides meals for elderly and disadvantaged individuals.

Human Services
9
Community Pantry

Provide emergency food, housing and utilities for people in need in the community

Human Services
10
Community Kitchen

Food service for the poor, economically disadvantaged, and elderly.

Food & Nutrition
11
Rochelle Enrichment Center Inc

To provide quality, affordable, accessible, child care in a developmentally appropriate learning environment. the program is committed to the holistic development of the individual child through a broad range of educational programs, which…

12
Oshkosh Area Community Pantry Inc

The oshkosh area community pantry strives to eliminate food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Village of Progress Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hub City Senior Citizens Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OTHER VARIOUS GRANTS — $276,728 · OtherOTHER VARIOUS GRANTSROCHELLE CHRISTIAN FOOD PANTRY — $42,650 · OtherROCHELLE CHRISTIAN FOOD PANTRYPEGASUS SPECIAL RIDERS INC — $30,000 · OtherPEGASUS SPECIAL RIDERS INCKITCHEN TABLE INC — $25,400 · OtherROCHELLE CHRISTIAN FOOD PANTRY — $24,678 · Other+9 more — $92,718 · Other+9 moreROCHELLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $74,803 · PhilanthropyROCHELLE AR…COMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE INC — $13,900 · Human ServicesHUB CITY SENIOR CITIZENS INC — $12,000 · Human ServicesHOPE OF OGLE COUNTY — $12,000 · Human ServicesVILLAGE OF PROGRESS INC — $8,000 · Human ServicesBELIEVE IN THE CHILDREN INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK — $35,300 · Food & NutritionLIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionROCHELLE RESCUE MISSION — $36,600 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OGLE COUNTY — $6,000 · Housing & ShelterSINNISSIPPI CENTERS INC — $18,028 · HealthFARMWORKER AND LANDSCAPER ADVOCACY PROJECT — $17,500 · Employment
Other$492,174Philanthropy$74,803Human Services$51,900Food & Nutrition$45,300Housing & Shelter$42,600Health$18,028Employment$17,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetROCHELLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $74,803 over 1y, 30% of budgetROCHELLE CHRISTIAN FOOD PANTRY — $42,650 over 2y, 13% of budgetROCHELLE RESCUE MISSION — $36,600 over 4y, 23% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK — $35,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKITCHEN TABLE INC — $25,400 over 2y, 12% of budgetSINNISSIPPI CENTERS INC — $18,028 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFARMWORKER AND LANDSCAPER ADVOCACY PROJECT — $17,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE INC — $13,900 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHUB CITY SENIOR CITIZENS INC — $12,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetHOPE OF OGLE COUNTY — $12,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVILLAGE OF PROGRESS INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OGLE COUNTY — $6,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetBELIEVE IN THE CHILDREN INC — $6,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Rock River ValleyIL17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Rock River Valley · United Way of Lee County Inc · The Etnyre Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern IL · Northern Illinois Food Bank · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rochelle Area Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph