· Private foundation
Robt & Gail Katz Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k81 grants · $60k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GESHER HUMAN SERVICES | $10,088 |
| TEMPLE ISRAEL | $7,172 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,250 |
| NATL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN | $6,141 |
| YAD EZRA | $6,136 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF METRO DETROIT | $5,560 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE | $5,200 |
| GLEANERS FOOD BANK | $5,150 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,125 |
| JARC | $5,072 |
| SONG AND SPIRIT | $537 |
| JEWISH SENIOR LIFE SVC | $370 |
| STRATFORD FESTIVAL | $350 |
| DIA | $330 |
| HADASSAH | $300 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.
123 repeat relationships: 77 still active in FY2025, 46 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- GHGESHER HUMAN SERVICES4× · 2022–2025 · $16k · revenue +54%
- NCNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MICHIG3× · 2023–2025 · $10k · revenue +19%
- YEYAD EZRA5× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- NCNATI'L COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMENone grant, 2022 · $1k
- SPSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTERone grant, 2024 · $360
- CTCONGREGATION T CHIYAHone grant, 2021 · $360
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…
Women in global health (wgh) is a global movement and organization that brings together all genders and backgrounds to achieve gender equality in global health leadership.
To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.
The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…
We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…
Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…
(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.
To make grants to charitable organizations and programs that support the achievement of sexual and reproductive health (srh) of the poor & underprivileged women and others in the asia-pacific and elsewhere.
The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…
We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
Gender equity in media access, representation, employment and ownership and a world in which a just media is considered essential to a just society. women, action & the media (wam) connects and supports media makers, activists, academics…
How this is measured
66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 200 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JARC ↗
- Who funds GESHER HUMAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds KADIMA ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MICHIG ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT ↗
- Who funds YAD EZRA ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SONG AND SPIRIT INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey Foundation · George M and Jo Elyn Nyman Charitable Trust · The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family Foundation · The Ravitz Foundation · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · Marvin and Betty Danto Family Foundation · The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundation · Pappas Foundation Inc · Alan Jay and Sue Kaufman Foundation · David Kahan Family Foundation · Grosfeld Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Robt & Gail Katz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robt & Gail Katz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Robt & Gail Katz Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Robt & Gail Katz Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Robt & Gail Katz Family’s filings →