· Private foundation
Robin Colson Memorial Foundation Tr Xxx-Xx-Xxxx
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF | $3,000 |
| DRAFT GRATITUDE | $2,500 |
| BEAVER BROOK ASSOCIATION | $2,000 |
| CONCORD COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL | $2,000 |
| UPREACH THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| THE MAYHEW PROGRAM | $2,000 |
| COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES | $2,000 |
| LIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC | $1,500 |
| KEENE HOUSING KIDS COLLABORATIVE | $1,500 |
| ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF | $1,500 |
| THE COLONIAL THEATRE | $1,000 |
| SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NH | $1,000 |
| NEW ENGLAND KURN HATTIN HOMES | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UTUPREACH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC7× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +36%
- CCCONCORD COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL8× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +14%
- LALIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC8× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- RFRETREAT FARM LTDone grant, 2021 · $5k
- AIARTS IN REACH - ENCOURAGING GROWTH THROUGH THE ARTSone grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +14%
- GMGREEN MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY INCORPORATEDgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +124%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide a safe harbor for german shepherd dogs
Catch's mission is to strengthen our communities by creating opportunities for permanently affordable, quality housing for people otherwise not being served.
A premier center for the arts in the white mountain area of new hampshire
The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.
To provide mental health services for persons in the Greater Manchester, NH area.
Finding responsible and caring forever homes; to provide shelter and care for lost, abandonded and unwanted animals; to be advocates for animals...speaking for those who cannot speak for themselves; to implement educational programs and…
To save the lives of animals through rescue, rehabilitation and adoption; to promote learning, eliminate animal cruelty and be a leader in advancing the highest standards in animal welfare.
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…
To promote responsible and sustainable home ownership opportunities for low and moderate income earners by producing comprehensive training and counseling, as well as promoting the use of special mortgage products and down payment…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Upreach Therapeutic Equestrian Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Draft Gratitude. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UPREACH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CONCORD COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds LIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC ↗
- Who funds WINDHAM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MAYHEW ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND KURN HATTIN HOMES ↗
- Who funds MANCHESTER COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BEAVER BROOK ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds DRAFT GRATITUDE ↗
- Who funds MILFORD REGIONAL COUNSELING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Harbor Homes Inc ↗
- Who funds THE COLONIAL THEATRE ↗
- Who funds ARTS IN REACH - ENCOURAGING GROWTH THROUGH THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds GREEN MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds KEENE HOUSING KIDS COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds WEBSTER HOUSE ↗
- Who funds THE MANCHESTER CHORAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds GERDAS EQUINE RESCUE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Samuel P Hunt Foundation · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · The McIninch Foundation · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson · Arthur L Getz Charitable Tr · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Norwin S and Elizabeth N Bean Foundati · Granite United Way
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robin Colson Memorial Foundation Tr Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Green Mountain Conservancy Incorporated — 49% of income from government
- New England Kurn Hattin Homes — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.