Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert Swanson and Cynthia Shevlin Charitable

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$180k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$280kEducation$90kInternational$60kReligion$60kAnimals$50kPhilanthropy$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT ZAWADI INC$30,000
DAYSTAR US$30,000
ARIZONA MUSICFEST$25,000
THE PHOENIX SYMPHONY$25,000
MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM$25,000
THE MARVELWOOD SCHOOL$15,000
ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF ART$10,000
SCOTTSDALE ARTS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM: $25k → 11%ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 18%DAYSTAR US: $30k → 11%PROJECT ZAWADI INC: $30k → 14%SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF ART: $10k → 14%THE MARVELWOOD SCHOOL: $15k → 9%MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM: $25k → 11%ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 18%DAYSTAR US: $30k → 11%PROJECT ZAWADI: $30k → 14%THE MARVELWOOD SCHOOL: $15k → 9%SCOTTSDALE ARTS: $25k → 11%SCOTTSDALE ARTS: $10k → 11%THE PHOENIX SYMPHONY: $25k → 11%ARIZONA MUSICFEST: $25k → 11%THE PHOENIX SYMPHONY: $25k → 11%ARIZONA MUSICFEST: $25k → 11%VETERANS HERITAGE PROJECT: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$625k · 13 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
5

Total granted

$625k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+9%

Still filing today

54%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PZ
    PROJECT ZAWADI INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $60k · revenue +2%
  • AM
    ARIZONA MUSICFEST INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k · revenue +46%
  • PS
    PHOENIX SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • WW
    WOOFS WIGGLES N WAGS RESCUE
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • RP
    RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • VA
    VI AT SILVERSTONE EDUCATION FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Opera Southwest

Professional production of opera for the public, and education about opera and the performing arts for audiences of all ages.

Arts & Culture
2
Arizona School for the Arts

Arizona school for the arts inspires creative thinkers and leaders through providing an innovative concentration in college preparation informed by the performing arts.

Education
3
Southern Arizona Symphony Orchestra

To provide quality memorable instrumental music to audiences at an affordable price.

—
4
Arizona Opera Company

Arizona opera elevates the transformative power of storytelling through music - cultivating community and strengthening a state and people as adventurous and diverse as the place they call home.

Arts & Culture
5
The Phoenix Chorale

Nurture and amplify the strength and resonance of arizonas choral artistry through live concert experiences performed by professional singers living in arizona, and via recordings and other media for those outside the state to know and…

—
6
ArtsPlus

Arts+ teaches music and art to students of all socioeconomic backgrounds, offering financial assistance, scholarship and free outreach programs to honor its founding mission to make high-quality arts instruction available to all.

—
7
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
8
Arizona Academy of the Performing Arts Inc

To create great people through great performances

Arts & Culture
9
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
10
Lodestar Charitable Foundation

To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc. remains a qualified organization.

—
11
Museum School

The museum school celebrates, nurtures and enhances the ability of all participants through experimental, project-based learning. infusing the arts and utilizing resources available at local museums.

Education
12
Valley Christian Schools

The mission of valley christian schools is to equip students to be culture changers for christ by delivering academic excellence, facilitating spiritual growth, and building lifelong community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Phoenix Symphony Association; the most unlike its peers is Imprints of Honor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROJECT ZAWADI: $95,000 · OtherPROJECT ZAWADISCOTTSDALE ARTS: $75,000 · OtherSCOTTSDALE ARTSDAYSTAR US INC: $60,000 · OtherDAYSTAR US INCWOOFS WIGGLES N WAGS RESCUE: $50,000 · OtherWOOFS WIGGLES N WAGS RESCUEMARVELWOOD SCHOOL: $45,000 · OtherMARVELWOOD SCHOOLRPI: $40,000 · OtherRPIRENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $20,000 · OtherMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM: $20,000 · OtherVETERANS HERITAGE PROJECT: $15,000 · Other+3 more: $30,000 · Other+3 moreARIZONA MUSICFEST INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureARIZONA MUSICFEST INCPHOENIX SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · Arts & CulturePHOENIX SYMPHONY ASSOCIATIONMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM: $50,000 · Arts & CultureMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUMSCOTTSDALE ARTS: $35,000 · Arts & CultureSCOTTSDALE ARTS+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CulturePROJECT ZAWADI INC: $60,000 · EducationPROJECT ZAWAD…MARVELWOOD SCHOOL INC: $30,000 · EducationMARVELWOOD SC…ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Philanthropy
Other$450,000Arts & Culture$190,000Education$90,000Philanthropy$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROJECT ZAWADI INC: $60,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetDAYSTAR US INC: $60,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetARIZONA MUSICFEST INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPHOENIX SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSCOTTSDALE ARTS: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARVELWOOD SCHOOL INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMPRINTS OF HONOR: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROJECT ZAWADI INC ↗
  • Who funds DAYSTAR US INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA MUSICFEST INC ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SCOTTSDALE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds MARVELWOOD SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IMPRINTS OF HONOR ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert Swanson and Cynthia Shevlin Charitable funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert Swanson and Cynthia Shevlin Charitable. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert Swanson and Cynthia Shevlin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph