Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert S & Marjorie y Scott Foundtn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$96kFood & Nutrition$84kArts & Culture$71kHealth$47kReligion$34kHuman Services$30kHousing & Shelter$29kCivil Rights$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$616k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$10,000
ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK$5,000
SAN FRANCISCO MARIN FOOD BANK$5,000
FOR-SITE FOUNDATION$5,000
MARIN COMMUNITY CLINICS$4,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$4,000
SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
BREAD AND ROSES$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
NPCA$2,000
WEST MARIN COMMUNITY SERVICES$2,000
COMMUNITY CHURCH OF MILL VALLEY$2,000
HOMEWARD BOUND$1,750
GLIDE FOUNDATION$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Martha's Village and Kitchen: $1k → 11%Ritter House: $2k → 8%St Vincent de Paul Society of Marin: $2k → 8%Ritter House: $1k → 8%St Vincent de Paul Society of Marin: $1k → 8%Ritter House: $1k → 8%RITTER HOUSE: $1k → 8%St Vincent de Paul Society of Marin: $1k → 8%Ritter House: $1k → 8%RITTER HOUSE: $1k → 8%St Vincent de Paul Society of Marin: $1k → 8%St Vincent de Paul Society of Marin: $1k → 8%Ritter House: $1k → 8%RITTER HOUSE: $1k → 8%RITTER HOUSE: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
OH
CA
NM
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$456k · 40 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
9

Total granted

$456k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+31%

Still filing today

55%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $86k · revenue +98%
  • FF
    FOR-SITE Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +30%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • UF
    Undocufund for fire relief
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • SA
    Springfield Arts Council Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue -7%
  • GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
Second Harvest Food Bank Santa Cruz County

Second harvest food bank's mission is to end hunger and malnutrition by educating and involving the community.

Food & Nutrition
3
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
4
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
5
Marin Community Foundation

Mobilizing the power of community and the resources of philanthropy to advance equity for people, places and the planet.

Philanthropy
6
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
7
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
8
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
9
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
10
Sacramento Region Community Foundation

The Sacramento Region Community Foundation leads, serves, and inspires enduring philanthropy for a just and vibrant Sacramento region.

Philanthropy
11
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
12
San Francisco Market Corporation

Our mission is to connect and grow the region's food agriculture community from our wholesale market in the heart of san francisco. our vision is for all communities in the san francisco bay area to have reliable access to abundant fresh…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Redwoods a Community of Seniors; the most unlike its peers is Chamber Music in Yellow Springs Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
22/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $30,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANKCommunity Church of Mill Valley: $27,000 · OtherCommunity Church of Mill ValleyPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $18,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODHOMEWARD BOUND: $14,500 · OtherHOMEWARD BOUNDTHE REDWOODS A COMMUNITY OF SENIORS: $13,000 · OtherTHE REDWOODS A COMMUNITY OF SENIORSBread Roses: $13,000 · OtherBread RosesIndividual grant recipient: $8,500 · OtherGLIDE FOUNDATION: $12,500 · OtherGLIDE FOUNDATION826 Valencia: $9,250 · Other+25 more: $69,600 · Other+25 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $85,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIER…INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $4,000 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $4,000 · International+1 more: $2,000 · InternationalFOR-SITE Foundation: $39,500 · Arts & CultureFOR-SITE Found…BREAD & ROSES PRESENTS: $13,000 · Arts & CultureBREAD & ROSES …CHAMBER MUSIC IN YELLOW SPRINGS INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureCHAMBER MUSIC …ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionROADRUNNE…SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $11,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HA…MARIN COMMUNITY CLINIC: $28,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthRITTER CENTER: $9,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $7,500 · Human ServicesST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MARIN COUNTY: $5,500 · Human ServicesMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesWEST MARIN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10,000 · PhilanthropyYELLOW SPRINGS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Philanthropy
Other$215,350International$95,500Arts & Culture$59,500Food & Nutrition$41,000Health$28,500Human Services$23,500Philanthropy$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $85,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFOR-SITE Foundation: $39,500 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN COMMUNITY CLINIC: $28,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE REDWOODS A COMMUNITY OF SENIORS: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBREAD & ROSES PRESENTS: $13,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetGLIDE FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWEST MARIN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetRITTER CENTER: $9,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budget826 Valencia: $9,250 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $7,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetYELLOW SPRINGS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MARIN COUNTY: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSpringfield Arts Council Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGLEN HELEN ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GREAT BOOKS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPoint Reyes National Seashore Association: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSide By Side: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOR-SITE Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds MARIN COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds THE REDWOODS A COMMUNITY OF SENIORS ↗
  • Who funds BREAD & ROSES PRESENTS ↗
  • Who funds GLIDE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds WEST MARIN COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds RITTER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds 826 Valencia ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CHAMBER MUSIC IN YELLOW SPRINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds YELLOW SPRINGS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MARIN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Springfield Arts Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds GLEN HELEN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GREAT BOOKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Point Reyes National Seashore Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA22.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Extrafood · Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Fred Gellert Family Foundation · Hobsonlucas Family Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Feibusch Foundation · Harbor Point Charitable Foundation · Heffernan Group Foundation · McNabb Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert S & Marjorie y Scott Foundtn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert S & Marjorie y Scott Foundtn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert S & Marjorie y Scott Foundtn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph