Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Robert Richardson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$193k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Education$275kYouth Development$230kReligion$161kInternational$15kEnvironment$8kHealth$3kHousing & Shelter$1k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $180k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$576k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUNG LIFE$40,000
YOUNG LIFE$40,000
COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY$25,000
COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY$20,000
BLYTHEWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$20,000
RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH$20,000
BLYTHEWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$15,000
WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$5,000
TEACHBEYOND INC$5,000
BROAD STREET METHODIST CHURCH$2,000
WELVISTA$500
CITY YEAR INC$350
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 20%WORLD WITNESS THE BOARD OF FOREIGN: $5k → 10%CITY YEAR INC: $350 → 11%RICHLAND SPRINGS BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 16%RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $20k → 16%BROAD STREET METHODIST CHURCH: $2k → 18%UPPER SAVANNAH LAND TRUST: $1k → 18%PEE DEE LAND TRUST: $5k → 20%PIONEERS: $5k → 13%VILLAGE MISSIONS: $15k → 13%COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED: $10k → 9%TEACHBEYOND INC: $5k → 7%UNION LUTHERAN CHURCH: $3k → 11%BLYTHEWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $25k → 16%SPRINGDALE BAPTIST CHURCH: $5k → 11%BLYTHEWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $25k → 16%BLYTHEWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $20k → 16%BLYTHEWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $15k → 16%BLYTHEWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $1k → 16%COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $50k → 16%COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $50k → 16%COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $25k → 16%COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $25k → 16%COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $25k → 16%COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $25k → 16%COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $25k → 16%COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $20k → 16%COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $20k → 16%COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%CROSSOVER COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC: $3k → 16%CONGAREE LAND TRUST: $2k → 16%PROVIDENCE HOME: $1k → 16%WELVISTA: $2k → 16%WELVISTA: $500 → 16%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 16%COLUMBIA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 16%COLUMBIA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 20% of Robert Richardson Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Robert Richardson Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$319k · 3 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
14

Total granted

$319k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
0%

Still filing today

67%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentYouth DevelopmentInternationalHealthReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    3× · 2022–2025 · $230k · revenue +18%
  • BP
    BLYTHEWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    4× · 2022–2025 · $86k
  • W
    WELVISTA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue -5%

Funded once

  • VM
    VILLAGE MISSIONS
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue +40%
  • CP
    COLUMBIA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • Compassion International Incorporated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
3
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
4
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
5
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

6
Financial Planning Ministry

Financial planning ministry, inc. (fpm) is a not-for-profit organization devoted to assisting in the performance of the functions of christian churches by serving their financial needs.

Health
7
Cadence International

Cadence international is an evangelical mission agency dedicated to reaching the military of the united states and of the world with the good news of jesus christ. we share the gospel and our lives with the military community.

8
Lake Champlain Land Trust Inc

The mission of the lake champlain land trust is to save the scenic beauty, natural communities, and recreational amenities of lake champlain by permanently preserving significant islands, shoreline areas, and natural communities in the…

Environment
9
Christian Care Surprise Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
10
Central Christian College of the Bible

Central christian college of the bible (central) exists to develop servant-leaders for the church. as a traditional undergraduate bible college of the restoration movement, central equips faithful men and women for leadership ministry.

Education
11
The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc

To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.

Environment
12
Christian Living Communities

Christian living communities enriches the quality and dignity of life for older adults through services and care that reflect christian love, respect, and compassion toward each individual.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Columbia International University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr15%10%10–20yr24%15%20–35yr9%35%35–55yr19%40%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr15%3%10–20yr24%2%20–35yr9%25%35–55yr19%71%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
12%
3,449/28,767

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
3/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY — $270,000 · EducationCOLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITYYOUNG LIFE — $230,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFEBLYTHEWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $86,000 · OtherBLYTHEWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHU…RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH — $20,000 · OtherRIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCHVILLAGE MISSIONS — $15,000 · OtherVILLAGE MISSIONSCOLUMBIA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $10,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA PRESBYTERIAN CHURC…+11 more — $38,350 · Other+11 moreCompassion International Incorporated — $10,000 · InternationalPEE DEE LAND TRUST — $5,000 · EnvironmentCONGAREE LAND TRUST — $2,000 · EnvironmentUPPER SAVANNAH LAND TRUST — $1,000 · EnvironmentWELVISTA — $2,500 · HealthCROSSOVER COMMUNICATIONS INTL — $2,500 · Religion
Education$270,000Youth Development$230,000Other$169,350International$10,000Environment$8,000Health$2,500Religion$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY — $270,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $230,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPEE DEE LAND TRUST — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWELVISTA — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSOVER COMMUNICATIONS INTL — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGAREE LAND TRUST — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUPPER SAVANNAH LAND TRUST — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOME — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds VILLAGE MISSIONS
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated
  • Who funds PEE DEE LAND TRUST
  • Who funds WELVISTA
  • Who funds CROSSOVER COMMUNICATIONS INTL
  • Who funds CONGAREE LAND TRUST
  • Who funds UPPER SAVANNAH LAND TRUST
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HOME
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Carolina Community FoundationSC19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Carolina Community Foundation · Columbia International University · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Robert Richardson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • City Year Inc11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph