Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert Raskind Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$355k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$472kFood & Nutrition$458kPhilanthropy$228kYouth Development$193kArts & Culture$192kAnimals$74kHealth$20k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $264k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$34,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$257k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOLDEN EMPIRE GLEANERS$75,000
BARC$38,300
OPEN DOOR NETWORK$34,000
THE MISSION OF KERN CO$34,000
BAKERSFIELD MUSEUM OF ART$34,000
Individual grant recipient$34,000
CASA ESPERANZA - BAKERSFIELD$34,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUBBAKERSFIELD$30,000
ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE ASSOC$13,000
ALPHA CANINE SANCTUARY$13,000
KERN COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL$8,500
BAGS 4 KIDS$5,000
BAKERSFIELD ART ASSN$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%BAKERSFIELD ARC: $4k → 18%BAKERSFIELD ARC: $3k → 18%OPEN DOOR NETWORK: $40k → 18%OPEN DOOR NETWORK: $34k → 18%OPEN DOOR NETWORK: $16k → 18%BAGS 4 KIDS: $5k → 18%BAGS 4 KIDS: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 18 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$1.6M
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+260%

Still filing today

44%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GE
    GOLDEN EMPIRE GLEANERS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $458k · revenue +36%
  • BA
    Bakersfield Art Foundation Inc DBA Bakersfield Museum of Art
    9× · 2017–2025 · $126k · revenue +48%
  • TO
    THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK
    3× · 2023–2025 · $90k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • KR
    KERN RIVER VALLEY ART ASSOCIATgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +260%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bakersfield Kern Regional Homeless Collaborative

To end homelessness in kern county through collaborative planning and action.

Human Services
2
Baker Community Arts Association
Arts & Culture
3
Kern County Library Foundation
Education
4
Bakersfield Recovery Services

Provide residential and outpatient treatment for drug and alcohol abuse.

Health
5
Fox Theater Foundation

The fox theater foundation is dedicated to restoring and operating the fox theater located in bakersfield, california.

Unclassified
6
Berkeley Art Center Association

Berkeley Art Center BAC works with artists and thinkers of all ages, backgrounds and experience levels to nurture their creative and professional potential. In collaboration with respected guest curators and a volunteer program committee,…

Arts & Culture
7
Kern Autism Network Inc

Kern Autism Network, Inc. provides support, awareness, information and education to families, professionals and the public throughout Kern County. We work towards cooperation, coordination and the creation of services between individuals…

Health
8
Epilepsy Society of Kern County
Health
9
Bakersfield City Ballet

The Bakersfield Regional Ballet strives to support the dreams and development of dancers throughout the central valley and the state of California. We are committed to providing exceptional dance performances, outreach for the local…

Arts & Culture
10
California Desert Arts Council Llc
Arts & Culture
11
Central California Art League Inc Dba Stanislaus Arts Council

The Stanislaus Arts Council supports, promotes, and advocates for artists, and creative endeavors of all forms that provide essential cultural opportunities for our community in Stanislaus County

Arts & Culture
12
Bakersfield Boxers & Bullies Rescue

To rescue stray dogs

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Arts Council of Kern; the most unlike its peers is Bags4Kids LaJuana Moser. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BARC: $196,900 · OtherBARCIndividual grant recipient: $181,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS GIRLS CLUBBAKERSFIELD: $138,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUBBAKERSFIELDCASA ESPERANZA - BAKERSFIELD: $74,000 · OtherCASA ESPERANZA - BAKERSFIELDTHE MISSION OF KERN CO: $74,000 · OtherTHE MISSION OF KERN COBOYS & GIRLS CLUBBAKERSFIELD: $55,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBBAKERSFIELDTHE MISSION OF KERN COUNTY: $36,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $28,000 · Other+2 more: $42,000 · OtherGOLDEN EMPIRE GLEANERS INC: $457,500 · Food & NutritionGOLDEN EMPIRE GLEANERS INCBakersfield Art Foundation Inc DBA Bakersfield Museum of Art: $126,000 · Arts & CultureBakersfield …THE ARTS COUNCIL OF KERN: $40,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ARTS COU…+2 more: $7,500 · Arts & CultureTHE OPEN DOOR NETWORK: $90,000 · Human ServicesBags4Kids LaJuana Moser: $10,000 · Human ServicesBakersfield Arc Inc: $7,000 · Human ServicesALPHA CANINE SANCTUARY: $74,000 · Animals
Other$824,900Food & Nutrition$457,500Arts & Culture$173,500Human Services$107,000Animals$74,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOLDEN EMPIRE GLEANERS INC: $457,500 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetBakersfield Art Foundation Inc DBA Bakersfield Museum of Art: $126,000 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetTHE OPEN DOOR NETWORK: $90,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetALPHA CANINE SANCTUARY: $74,000 over 9y, 31% of budgetTHE ARTS COUNCIL OF KERN: $40,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetBags4Kids LaJuana Moser: $10,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetBakersfield Arc Inc: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBakersfield Art Association: $5,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetKERN RIVER VALLEY ART ASSOCIAT: $2,500 over 1y, 4.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOLDEN EMPIRE GLEANERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Bakersfield Art Foundation Inc DBA Bakersfield Museum of Art ↗
  • Who funds THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA CANINE SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds THE ARTS COUNCIL OF KERN ↗
  • Who funds Bags4Kids LaJuana Moser ↗
  • Who funds Bakersfield Arc Inc ↗
  • Who funds Bakersfield Art Association ↗
  • Who funds KERN RIVER VALLEY ART ASSOCIAT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kern Community FoundationCA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kern Community Foundation · The Virginia and Alfred Harrell Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert Raskind Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert Raskind Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert Raskind’s filings →

    More from the funding graph