Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert R & Cooper L Burchenal Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$504kEducation$48kHousing & Shelter$20kHuman Services$20kReligion$17kArts & Culture$12kEnvironment$12kAnimals$10k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BBCTU$4,000
BLACKFOOT CHALLENGE$4,000
MONTANA STOCKGROWERS FOUNDATION$4,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL H$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MONTANA STOCKGROWERS FOUNDATION: $4k → 9%WATSON CHILDRENS SHELTER INC: $20k → 9%BLACKFOT CHALLENGE INC: $5k → 16%PEACEFUL VALLEY DONKEY RESCUE: $1k → 13%ST JOHN MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH: $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $5k → 13%CINCINNATI CANCER FOUNDATION: $482k → 16%MONTANA STOCKGROWERS FOUNDATION: $4k → 9%SEELEY SWAN HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 9%BBCTU: $4k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $5k → 13%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 16%POVERELLO CENTER INC: $20k → 9%BLACKFOOT CHALLENGE: $4k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $3k → 13%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 16%THE ROXY THEATER: $8k → 9%BIG BLACKFOT CHAPTERTROUT: $3k → 16%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 16%CHRIST CHURCH GLENDALE: $12k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

12%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$80k · 7 repeat orgs$563k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

$80k
$554k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+105%
+129%

Still filing today

43%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
    3× · 2020–2022 · $23k · revenue +36%
  • BC
    BLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC
    2× · 2021–2025 · $9k · revenue +105%
  • MS
    MONTANA STOCKGROWERS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +185%

Funded once

  • CC
    CINCINNATI CANCER FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $482k · revenue +237%
  • WC
    WATSON CHILDRENS SHELTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • PC
    POVERELLO CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado State University Foundation

Colorado state university foundation receives, manages and invests gifts in support of csu.

Education
2
North Carolina State University College

Provide financial support for all types of education and research within the college of sciences at north carolina state university.

Philanthropy
3
Missouri Western State University

Promote private giving and help the university move into the forefront of public higher education.

—
4
Unc Health Foundation Inc

The unc health foundation, inc. secures financial resources for the unc school of medicine and unc health to support the highest quality clinical care, life-changing research and innovative education.

Education
5
Clemson University Research Foundation

To support research, technology transfer, and related activities at and for the benefit of clemson university. to generate research funding opportunities for clemson university to support research initiatives that advance university…

Education
6
California State University Foundation

The mission of the california state university foundation is to enhance the educational excellence of the california state university in teaching, learning, community service, and applied research.

Philanthropy
7
Foundation of California State University Monterey Bay

To further the scientific, literary, educational and charitable purposes of california state university, monterey bay, including fundraising, development, endowment management, financial assistance, public relations and other support.

Education
8
North Carolina Veterinary Medical

To provide financial support for all types of education and research in the field of veterinary medicine at north carolina state university.

Education
9
Foundation of the University of North Carolina At Charlotte

The foundation of unc charlotte receives contributions to promote and develop the academic and educational purpose of unc charlotte by providing support for operations, educational programs, and scholarships for the university and its…

—
10
The University of Virginia Medical

University of virginia medical school foundation encourages and fosters the involvement of medical alumni in the life of their alma mater as ambassadors, advocates, advisors, benefactors and educational partners. the constituents of the…

Education
11
University of Colorado Foundation

The university of colorado foundation is the portal for philanthropic giving to the university of colorado and is responsible for receiving, managing, and investing the endowments and other gift funds the foundation holds for the benefit…

Education
12
Cdu Foundation

The cdu foundation was created to support the mission of cdu to carry out its charitable purposes.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Appalachian State University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Peaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CINCINNATI CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $481,707 · HealthCINCINNATI CANCER FOUNDATION INCCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $22,500 · HealthWATSON CHILDRENS SHELTER INC: $20,000 · OtherWATSON CHILDRENS SHEL…POVERELLO CENTER INC: $20,000 · OtherPOVERELLO CENTER INCUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $12,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH C…CHRIST CHURCH GLENDALE: $12,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH GLENDAL…UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MONTANA…APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherAPPALACHIAN STATE UNI…THE ROXY THEATER: $8,000 · OtherTHE ROXY THEATERSEELEY SWAN HIGH SCHOOL: $8,000 · OtherSEELEY SWAN HIGH SCHO…MONTANA STOCKGROWERS FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherMONTANA STOCKGROWERS …ST JOHN MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH: $5,000 · Other+4 more: $10,000 · Other+4 moreBLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC: $9,000 · EnvironmentBIG BLACKFOOT CHAPTER OF TROUT UNLIMITED INC: $3,000 · AnimalsPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc: $1,000 · AnimalsWESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Education
Health$504,207Other$123,500Environment$9,000Animals$4,000Education$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCINCINNATI CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $481,707 over 1y, 22% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMONTANA STOCKGROWERS FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetBIG BLACKFOOT CHAPTER OF TROUT UNLIMITED INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CINCINNATI CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA STOCKGROWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIG BLACKFOOT CHAPTER OF TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Peaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert R & Cooper L Burchenal Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert R & Cooper L Burchenal Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert R & Cooper L Burchenal Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Robert R & Cooper L Burchenal Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert R & Cooper L Burchenal’s filings →

    More from the funding graph