Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert L & Mary J Bartlett Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$95kFood & Nutrition$25kEducation$23kHousing & Shelter$23kHuman Services$20kInternational$20kArts & Culture$15kEnvironment$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$480k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUTH FIRST INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
WOLFGANG ORCHESTRA AND CHORUS$3,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$3,000
RIVERLINK$2,500
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$2,500
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$2,500
RIVERLINK$2,500
INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$2,500
BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR$2,500
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$2,000
WOLFGANG ORCHESTRA AND CHORUS$2,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%THORNWELL: $1k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IN
OH
CO
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$258k · 21 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
8

Total granted

$258k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+55%

Still filing today

48%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationHealthReligionHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    Green Heart Project Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $25k · revenue +1%
  • CR
    CROSS ROAD CORRECTIONAL MINISTRIES
    7× · 2019–2025 · $14k · revenue +33%
  • Indiana University Foundation
    5× · 2021–2025 · $12k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • MS
    MEETING STREET ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • EA
    EVIDENCE ACTIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +64%
  • EG
    EMPLOYEES GOOD NEIGHBOR FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
3
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
4
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
5
Lifewater Inc

Lifewater international is a non-profit christian water development organization dedicated to effectively serving vulnerable children and families by partnering with underserved communities to overcome water poverty.

Environment
6
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
7
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
8
InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA

In response to God's love, grace, and truth, the purpose (mission) of InterVarsity Christian Fellowship/USA is to establish and advance at colleges and universities witnessing communities of students and faculty who follow Jesus as Savior…

Religion
9
Visionsynergy

Our mission is to accelerate the great commission by equipping leaders, developing networks, and catalyzing collaboration toward spiritual breakthroughs among the least reached peoples and places of the world.

International
10
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
11
Mio Frontiers

Church planting among the least evangelized peoples of the world through recruiting, training, sending, and serving field workers.

Religion
12
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evidence Action; the most unlike its peers is Green Heart Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $42,500 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $22,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCROSS ROAD CORRECTIONAL MINISTRIES: $13,500 · OtherCROSS ROAD CORRECTIONAL MINISTRIESBAPTIST MID-MISSIONS: $12,000 · OtherBAPTIST MID-MISSIONSRiverLink Inc: $9,500 · OtherKENYA ISLANDS MISSIONS INC: $8,750 · OtherFAMILY MATTERS INC: $7,500 · OtherBLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR: $7,000 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $7,000 · OtherWORDS OF HOPE INC: $6,750 · Other+10 more: $23,340 · Other+10 moreGreen Heart Project Inc: $25,000 · EnvironmentGreen Hear…Compassion International Incorporated: $15,000 · InternationalEVIDENCE ACTION: $2,500 · InternationalWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $750 · International+2 more: $665 · InternationalIndiana University Foundation: $11,500 · EducationHOPE COLLEGE: $6,500 · EducationTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $5,500 · HealthYOUTH FIRST: $5,000 · HealthWOLFGANG ORCHESTRA & CHORUS INC: $8,500 · Arts & CultureBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $4,500 · Religion
Other$190,590Environment$25,000International$18,915Education$18,000Health$10,500Arts & Culture$8,500Religion$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGreen Heart Project Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $15,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCROSS ROAD CORRECTIONAL MINISTRIES: $13,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $11,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRiverLink Inc: $9,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWOLFGANG ORCHESTRA & CHORUS INC: $8,500 over 5y, 18% of budgetFAMILY MATTERS INC: $7,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE: $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPatchwork Central Inc: $5,250 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTH FIRST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEVIDENCE ACTION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHORNWELL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLifebox Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJONATHANS HOUSE CENTRAL AFRICA INC: $165 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Green Heart Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds CROSS ROAD CORRECTIONAL MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RiverLink Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOLFGANG ORCHESTRA & CHORUS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY MATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Patchwork Central Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH FIRST ↗
  • Who funds BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP ↗
  • Who funds EVIDENCE ACTION ↗
  • Who funds THORNWELL ↗
  • Who funds Lifebox Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds JONATHANS HOUSE CENTRAL AFRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL11.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert L & Mary J Bartlett Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert L & Mary J Bartlett Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Robert L & Mary J Bartlett Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Robert L & Mary J Bartlett Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert L & Mary J Bartlett’s filings →

More from the funding graph