· Private foundation
Robert & Joan Dircks Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k48 grants · $243k
- $10k–50k40 grants · $519k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EMMANUEL CANCER FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| WHY ME INC | $25,000 |
| HOME OF THE SPARROW | $20,000 |
| QUEST THERAPEUTIC SERVICES | $20,000 |
| ADLER APHASIA CENTER | $20,000 |
| THE PHOENIX CENTER | $15,000 |
| MATERNAL & CHILD HEALTH CONSORTIUM | $15,000 |
| EMBRACE KIDS FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| ANSHE EMETH CDC OF CENTRAL JERSEY | $15,000 |
| PROGERIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| HOMESHARING INC | $15,000 |
| HAPPINESS IS CAMPING | $15,000 |
| STUDENTPARTNER ALLIANCE | $14,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF MORRIS COUNTY | $12,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $778k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
159 repeat relationships — 63 still active in FY2025, 96 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $146k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MAMATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CONSORTIUM OF CHESTER COUNTY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $170k · revenue +176%
- QTQUEST THERAPEUTIC SERVICES INC8× · 2017–2025 · $160k · revenue +63%
- TETHE EMMANUEL CANCER FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $150k · revenue +136%
Funded once
- SASaint Agnes Catholic Churchone grant, 2017 · $20k
- TCTHE CTC ACADEMY INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +49%
- SOSisters of Charity of New Yorkone grant, 2019 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To identify children's needs through research, policy and legal analysis, to raise awareness of those needs through strategic communications, and to work with elected officials and other decision-makers to enact effective responses.
To partner with children, families, and communities to help children in need to overcome significant social, emotional, and behavioral challenges.
To provide a comprehensive and responsive service system for families of children with special mental, emotional, and behavioral needs throughout the county of camden, as well as to increase awareness of these children and their needs.
Carelink community support services of new jersey's mission is to assist adult citizens of nj living with psychiatric disability in acquiring the tools necessary to live health and fulfilling lives.
To build the skills of individuals with varying abilities and developmental needs, by providing clinical treatment, community integration, vocational training and work opportunities in order to achieve and maintain productive lives.
Abilities of northwest jersey, inc. is dedicated to inspiring people with disabilities to achieve their life goals by providing individualized supports.
To serve the expanding and evolving in-home needs of residents of northern nj by delivering a continuum of care for clients and families through the services of a highly trained caring and compassionate workforce.
The mission of advance housing, inc. is to expand the range and scope of supportive housing opportunities available to persons with psychiatric disabilities. in addition, we will seek to make similar options and services available to other…
Promoting, assisting and supporting the sustainability and growth of casa programs in new jersey. casa programs promote the protection of abused and neglected children by using trained volunteers to advocate for these children in courts…
When a family is in crisis, Bridges is there to offer support by providing respite and host homes for children in our community. Children visit respite homes for several hours after school or on weekends to enjoy the benefit of a nurturing…
The mission of circle of care is to provide strength-based care management services for youth and families in passaic county experiencing emotional, behavioral, developmental and substance use challenges. through team collaboration,…
Establish a unified voice for children and youth with emotional, behavioral, and social challenges. the organizational mission is to ensure that every family has access to needed information, support, and services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe in Hunterdon and the most unlike its peers is High Ridge Harmony Farm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
188 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 188 of the 282 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CONSORTIUM OF CHESTER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds QUEST THERAPEUTIC SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE EMMANUEL CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ADLER APHASIA CENTER ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA HOME OF THE SPARROW ↗
- Who funds WHY ME INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MOUNT SAINT VINCENT ↗
- Who funds HAPPINESS IS CAMPING ↗
- Who funds PROGERIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JERSEY BATTERED WOMEN'S SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER HOPE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds THE PHOENIX CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MAIN STREET COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds BERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds HOMESHARING INC ↗
- Who funds Fighting Childrens Cancer Foundation ↗
- Who funds NAMI Mercer NJ Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUND START BABIES PROGRAM FOR DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN WITH CANCER AND BLOOD DISORDERS INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF MORRIS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP RISE ABOVE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL LISNOW RESPITE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE ACADEMY OF CLINICAL & APPLIED PSYCHOANALYSIS INC ↗
- Who funds PRESCHOOL ADVANTAGE INC ↗
- Who funds Push To Walk a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation ↗
- Who funds CASA PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CASA YOUTH ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds APHASIAACCESS ↗
- Who funds KELLY ANNE DOLAN MEMORIAL FUND ↗
- Who funds THE STURGE-WEBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF BERGEN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds FAN4KIDS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Investors Foundation Inc · Columbia Bank Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Provident Bank Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Pseg Foundation Inc · Lillian P Schenck Tw Lps Fund · Citizens Philanthropic Foundation Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Kearnybank Foundation Inc · Oceanfirst Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robert & Joan Dircks Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mount Carmel Guild of Trenton Nj — 100% of income from government
- Employment Horizons Inc — 90% of income from government
- Bethany Cares Inc — 89% of income from government
- House of Possibilities Inc — 76% of income from government
- Ocean's Harbor House Inc — 75% of income from government
- Cornerstone Community Housing Inc — 68% of income from government
- Safe in Hunterdon — 51% of income from government
- Alice Paul Institute Inc — 43% of income from government
- Jersey Battered Women's Service Inc — 40% of income from government
- Prevention Education Inc — 39% of income from government
- Family and Children's Aid Inc — 36% of income from government
- Family Promise of Essex County Inc — 33% of income from government
- Pikesville Volunteer Fire Co Inc — 32% of income from government
- Joseph's House of Camden Llc — 32% of income from government
- Family Promise of Sussex County Inc — 32% of income from government
- Diabetes Foundation Inc — 31% of income from government
- Nourishnj Inc — 27% of income from government
- Mercy Center Corporation — 21% of income from government
- Family Promise of Morris County Inc — 17% of income from government
- Adler Aphasia Center — 12% of income from government
- The Baltimore Station Inc — 11% of income from government
- Family Promise of Warren County Inc — 9% of income from government
- Volunteer Lawyers for Justice in — 9% of income from government
- Our Neighbors' Table Inc — 8% of income from government
- Opportunity Project Inc — 6% of income from government
- Loyola University Maryland Inc — 6% of income from government
- Dover Child Care Center Inc — 5% of income from government
- Arm in Arm Inc — 4% of income from government
- Give Chances Inc — 3% of income from government
- Special Parent Advocacy Group — 3% of income from government
- Arts Horizons Inc — 3% of income from government
- Saint Elizabeth University — 2% of income from government
- We Make Autism at Work Inc — 2% of income from government
- Special Strides Inc — 2% of income from government
- Children On the Green Inc — 1% of income from government
- Elijahs Promise Inc — 1% of income from government
- Sage Eldercare — 1% of income from government
- Sierra House Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Phoenix Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Robert & Joan Dircks Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Robert & Joan Dircks Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.