Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert J and Elizabeth A Symon Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$103k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$191kHealth$83kInternational$39kRecreation & Sports$29kArts & Culture$20kHousing & Shelter$16kEducation$14kPublic Benefit$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $93k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$4,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Camp Li Lo Li$10,000
Intervarsity Christian FellowshipUS$9,000
Union Gospel Missions Dallas$8,000
Rejoice in the Lord TV$8,000
Samaritan's Purse$8,000
Alzheimers Association$7,000
Christian Missions in Mny Land$7,000
UT Southwestern Medical Center$5,000
Geneva Lake Conservency$5,000
Believers Chapel$5,000
American Cancer Society$4,000
Dallas Symphony$4,000
American Heart Association$4,000
International Missions Board$3,500
Rutgers University$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Navigators: $2k → 12%Camp Li Lo Li: $10k → 16%Dallas Theological Seminary: $3k → 14%Geneva Lake Conservency: $5k → 10%Samaritan's Purse: $8k → 21%Christian Missions in Mny Land: $7k → 6%Rutgers University: $3k → 8%International Missions Board: $4k → 9%Alzheimers Association: $7k → 8%Veterans of Foreign Wars: $2k → 7%Navigators: $2k → 12%Camp Li Lo Li: $5k → 16%Dallas Theological Seminary: $3k → 14%Samaritan's Purse: $8k → 21%Christian Missions in Mny Land: $7k → 6%Rutgers University: $3k → 8%International Missions Board: $4k → 9%Alzheimers Association: $2k → 8%Camp Li Lo Li: $5k → 16%Dallas Theological Seminary: $3k → 14%Samaritan's Purse: $8k → 21%Christian Missions in Mny Land: $7k → 6%Rutgers University: $3k → 8%International Missions Board: $4k → 9%Camp Li Lo Li: $5k → 16%Dallas Theological Seminary: $3k → 14%Samaritan's Purse: $8k → 21%Christian Missions in Mny Land: $7k → 6%Rutgers University: $3k → 8%International Missions Board: $4k → 9%Camp Li Lo Li: $5k → 16%Samaritan's Purse: $7k → 21%Christian Missions in Mny Land: $5k → 6%Believers Chapel: $5k → 14%Believers Chapel: $5k → 14%Believers Chapel: $5k → 14%Believers Chapel: $5k → 14%Believers Chapel: $4k → 14%Union Gospel Missions Dallas: $8k → 14%Union Gospel Missions Dallas: $8k → 14%Union Gospel Mission Dallas: $8k → 14%Union Gospel Mission Dallas: $8k → 14%Union Gospel Mission Dallas: $8k → 14%Dallas Symphony: $4k → 14%Dallas Symphony: $4k → 14%Dallas Symphony: $4k → 14%Dallas Symphony: $4k → 14%Dallas Symphony: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
WI
MI
NY
NJ
VA
MD
AZ
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$404k · 21 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
4

Total granted

$404k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+15%

Still filing today

33%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEnvironmentReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    5× · 2020–2025 · $39k · revenue +106%
  • DS
    DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $19k · revenue +27%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • ARTISTS WORKING IN EDUCATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue -25%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $500
  • CL
    Canandaigua Lake Watershed Association
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Living Water International

Living Water International ("Living Water") exists to demonstrate the love of God by helping communities in 17 developing countries acquire desperately needed clean water and to experience "living water" - the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Human Services
2
Lakes Region Conservation Trust

The mission of the Organization is the conservation of the natural resources of the Lakes Region of New Hampshire, the preservation of wildlife habitat, the stewardship of lands that define the character of the region and its quality of…

Environment
3
Maine Lakes Society Dba Maine Lakes

To protect and preserve of maine's lakes, both today and long into the future. our programs and activities promote healthy lakes for all lake users, including residents, visitors, lake associations, communities, and the next generation of…

Environment
4
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
5
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
6
Texas Agricultural Land Trust

To conserve the Texas heritage of agricultural lands, natural resources, and wildlife habitats.

Environment
7
The Association of State Wetland Managers Inc

To promote the protection and restoration of wetlands and related aquatic resources, to apply sound science to wetland management, and to provide training, education, and capacity building for our members and the public.

Environment
8
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
9
Lake Leelanau Lake Association

The lake leelanau lake association is dedicated to protecting and enhancing the quality and beauty of lake leelanau and its surrounding watershed for current and future generations.

Environment
10
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
11
Land Trust Accreditation Commission

The mission of the land trust accreditation commission is to inspire excellence, promote public trust and ensure permanence in the conservation of open lands by recognizing land trust organizations that meet rigorous quality standards and…

Environment
12
Wisconsin Woodland Owners Association Incorporated

The mission of the wisconsin woodland owners association is to conserve and enhance the private woodlands of the state through the following actions: sustainably manage our woodlands with informed management plans that utilize best…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Finger Lakes Land Trust Inc; the most unlike its peers is Uplook Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Intervarsity Christian FellowshipUS: $42,500 · OtherIntervarsity Christian FellowshipUSRejoice in the Lord TV: $38,000 · OtherRejoice in the Lord TVChristian Missions in Mny Land: $33,000 · OtherChristian Missions in Mny LandCAMP LI LO LI INCORPORATED: $28,500 · OtherCAMP LI LO LI INCORPORATEDUT Southwestern Medical Center: $25,000 · OtherUT Southwestern Medical CenterUGM OF DALLAS: $24,000 · OtherUGM OF DALLASBELIEVERS CHAPEL INC: $23,000 · OtherBELIEVERS CHAPEL INCAmerican Cancer Society: $17,500 · OtherAmerican Cancer SocietyUnion Gospel Missions Dallas: $16,000 · OtherInternational Missions Board: $14,000 · OtherRutgers University: $14,000 · OtherMD Anderson Center: $13,000 · Other+5 more: $16,000 · OtherSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $38,500 · ReligionSAMARITAN'…American Heart Association Inc: $17,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · HealthDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $18,500 · Arts & CultureUPLOOK MINISTRIES INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureARTISTS WORKING IN EDUCATION INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureDallas Theological Seminary: $13,000 · EducationGENEVA LAKE CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentThe Finger Lakes Land Trust Inc: $500 · Environment
Other$304,500Religion$38,500Health$27,500Arts & Culture$22,000Education$13,000Environment$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $38,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $18,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $17,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Theological Seminary: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGENEVA LAKE CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS: $5,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUPLOOK MINISTRIES INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetARTISTS WORKING IN EDUCATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCanandaigua Lake Watershed Association: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Finger Lakes Land Trust Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Theological Seminary ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA LAKE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS ↗
  • Who funds UPLOOK MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTS WORKING IN EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Canandaigua Lake Watershed Association ↗
  • Who funds The Finger Lakes Land Trust Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert J and Elizabeth A Symon Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert J and Elizabeth A Symon Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert J and Elizabeth A Symon Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph