· Private foundation
Robert H & Anita Q Lawe Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN'S ORGAN TRANSPLANT ASSOC | $7,300 |
| ORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN | $5,500 |
| SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUND | $4,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,700 |
| LOVE 146 | $4,600 |
| DREAM FOUNDATION | $4,500 |
| NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION | $4,024 |
| THE ALS ASSOCIATION | $3,700 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $3,700 |
| GOOD360 | $3,650 |
| FREEDOM SERVICE DOG | $3,600 |
| MAP INTERNATIONAL | $3,550 |
| KIDS OUTDOOR ZONE | $3,550 |
| THE CONCIL ON RECOVERY | $3,250 |
| FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS | $3,100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
39 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
MAP International Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $43k · revenue +68%- OGORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN INC4× · 2021–2024 · $15k · revenue +35%
- TFTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES4× · 2021–2024 · $12k · revenue +127%
Funded once
- GBGREAT BASIN WILDLIFE RESCUREone grant, 2022 · $5k
MEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INCone grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -47%- SASOLDIERS' ANGELSgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Donor Alliance saves and heals lives through organ and tissue donation. Donor Alliance is one of 55 Federally designated, non-profit organ procurement organizations serving Colorado and most of Wyoming. Additionally, it is a member of the…
Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.
Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…
Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…
Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Soldiers' Angels and the most unlike its peers is Therapy Pet Pals of Texas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAP International Inc ↗
- Who funds COTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association ↗
- Who funds DALMATIAN DREAMS DBA DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN INC ↗
- Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES ↗
- Who funds LOVE146 INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GOOD360 ↗
- Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Matthew 25 Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds Beloved and Beyond ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
- Who funds The Council on Recovery ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MILITARY FAMILY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COMPASSION & CHOICES ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS TRANSPLANT INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds HOUSTON EYE ASSOCIATES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Volunteer Interfaith Caregivers SW ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL HOSPICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
- Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
- Who funds WELLSPRINGS VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds Paws With A Cause ↗
- Who funds THE KIDS OUTDOORS ZONE INC ↗
- Who funds THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
- Who funds Back 2 Basics Ministry ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Medallion Foundation Inc · Sterling-Turner Foundation · Charity Guild of Catholic Women of Harris County Inc · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company · Strake Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · The Chicago Community Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robert H & Anita Q Lawe Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- LOVE146 Inc — 49% of income from government
- Center for Creative Education — 2% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Robert H & Anita Q Lawe Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Robert H & Anita Q Lawe Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.