Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Robert H & Beverly U Fowler Fdn-Tr 2870

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$202k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$202k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 53% of ROBERT H & BEVERLY U FOWLER FDN-TR 2870’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$202,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$863k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$202,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE PHILADELPHIA FREEDOM VALLEY YMCA: $1k → 7%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MA
IA
PA
CT
UT
MD
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$288k · 18 repeat orgs$971k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
29

Total granted

$288k
$769k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+19%

Still filing today

67%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $202k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK
    6× · 2018–2024 · $27k · revenue +54%
  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    4× · 2020–2024 · $23k · revenue +35%
  • Philabundance
    3× · 2020–2023 · $18k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • Southern Methodist Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +26%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE WEST SHORE
    one grant, 2020 · $250k
  • FO
    Friends of the West Shore Theatre Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
4
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
5
Geneva College

Geneva college is a christ-centered academic community that provides a comprehensive education to equip students for faithful and fruitful service to god and neighbor.

Education
6
Whyy Inc

Whyy is the philadelphia region's leading public media provider, serving southeastern pennsylvania, southern new jersey, and all of delaware.

Arts & Culture
7
Chambersburg Hospital

The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
8
Penn State Health Hampden Medical Center

Penn state health hampden medical center's mission is to continually improve the health and well-being of the people in pennsylvania. the organization provides patients with excellent, compassionate and culturally responsive and equitable…

Health
9
Manna On Main Street

Manna on main street is committed to ending hunger in the north penn region by providing food, fulfilling social service and education needs, and conducting community outreach. through a food pantry and soup kitchen, emergency financial…

10
Chester County Food Bank

We mobilize and educate our community to ensure equitable access to nutritious and familiar food. we do this by raising, and soliciting funds for the acquisition, storage, growing, collection and distribution of food to low income citizens…

Food & Nutrition
11
Penn State Health Holy Spirit Medical Center

The mission of penn state health holy spirit medical center is to nurture the healing ministry of the church, supported by education and research. fidelity to the gospel urges us to emphasize human dignity and social justice as we create…

Health
12
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Pennsylvania Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Send Hope Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyArts & Cultural Organizatio…Food Pantries and Hunger Re…Affordable Housing ProvidersYouth Development ProgramsChristian Mission Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%4%<5yr16%4%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr11%31%35–55yr14%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr16%16%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr11%14%35–55yr14%43%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
13%
3,340/25,391

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
20/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRIENDS OF THE WEST SHORE — $250,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE WEST SHOREIndividual grant recipient — $202,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNEW CUMBERLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY — $105,080 · OtherNEW CUMBERLAND PUBLIC LIBRARYNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $23,000 · Other+29 more — $106,500 · Other+29 moreSouthern Methodist University — $250,000 · EducationSouthern Methodist Uni…Friends of the West Shore Theatre Inc — $100,000 · Arts & CultureFriends of th…NATIONAL CIVIL WAR MUSEUM — $20,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL CIVI…THE HARRISBURG SINGERS — $8,500 · Arts & CultureTHE HARRISBUR…BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $6,000 · Arts & CulturePERRY COUNTY COUNCIL OF THE ARTS — $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PERRY HISTORIANS — $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $2,000 · Arts & CultureASBURY FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · PhilanthropyASBURY FO…+1 more — $2,000 · PhilanthropyCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK — $27,000 · Food & NutritionPhilabundance — $18,000 · Food & NutritionSEND HOPE INC — $17,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc — $2,000 · InternationalCHRISTIAN RECOVERY AFTERCARE MINISTRY INC — $10,000 · Health
Other$686,580Education$250,000Arts & Culture$146,500Philanthropy$102,000Food & Nutrition$45,000International$19,000Health$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSouthern Methodist University — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the West Shore Theatre Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetASBURY FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK — $27,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $23,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CIVIL WAR MUSEUM — $20,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPhilabundance — $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEND HOPE INC — $17,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetCHRISTIAN RECOVERY AFTERCARE MINISTRY INC — $10,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetTHE HARRISBURG SINGERS — $8,500 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION — $5,500 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetPERRY COUNTY COUNCIL OF THE ARTS — $5,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN MID STATE PA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PERRY HISTORIANS — $5,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetGREATER VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR SPIRITUAL FORMATION INC — $3,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetOUR RESCUE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDARDS HOUSE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE LION FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetALLEN COMMUNITY OUTREACH — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetART ASSOCIATION OF HARRISBURG — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGreater Philadelphia Young Men's Christian Association — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGATEWAY OF GRACE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Foundation for Enhancing CommunitiesPA21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · Hall Foundation · United Way of the Capital Region · The Donald B and Dorothy L Stabler Foundation · Lawrence L & Julia Z Hoverter Charitable Foundation · Kenneth Bankert Foundation Inc · Pennsylvania Automotive Association Foundation · The S Wilson and Grace M Pollock Foundation · McCormick Family Fdn Agent 80397 · John Crain Kunkel Foundation · Ppl Foundation · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Robert H & Beverly U Fowler Fdn-Tr 2870 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph