How much did Robert Glenn Rapp Foundation grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 66% of Robert Glenn Rapp Foundation’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

virtualbuildingstudentsremodelmedicalsecurity

2021

pregnancybuildingcrisissan diegomuseumremodelmedical

2022

needed trusteetrustee discretioncapupgradecrisisstudentsmedical

2023

orchestra choruscampustrainingcommunicationsokcrenovationupgrades

2024

support-ttee desccommunicationsupgradesplayground facilityrenovationsscholarshipsconstruct

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k13 grants · $45k
$10k–50k17 grants · $317k
$50k–250k17 grants · $1.6M

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$46M

Total assets

Largest grants

Catholic Charities$201,500
Oklahoma University$200,000
Heritage Hall School$126,700
Myriad Gardens Foundation$126,500
Cistercian Prep School$105,000
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundatio$105,000
San Diego Symphony Orchestra$104,000
Southern Methodist University$101,000
PIEDMONT EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER$100,000
OKLA CITY UNIV$75,000
Moonlight Cultural Foundation$56,000
STFRANCIS ASSISI CATHOLIC CHURCH$55,000
Mayflower Congregational Church$52,000
St Anthony Hospital Foundation$51,000
Oklahoma Zoological Society$50,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $519k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 9%. 78% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$7.4M · 68 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

68 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$7.4M

$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%

+22%

Still filing today

40%

26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $427k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

Southern Methodist University
5× · 2020–2024 · $758k · revenue +35%
HH
Heritage Hall School
5× · 2020–2024 · $454k · revenue +77%
CC
Catholic Charities
4× · 2021–2024 · $409k · revenue +195%

Funded once

IH
Integris Health Foundation
one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -30%
HF
HARDING FINE ARTS ACADEMY FND
one grant, 2022 · $100k
UO
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA
one grant, 2022 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Oklahoma Baptist University

A Christian Liberal Arts University.

Education

Oklahoma Christian University

Oklahoma Christian University Exists to educate, mentor, and inspire students to fulfill their potential and transform their lives through Christian faith, scholarship, and service.

Education

University of Central Oklahoma

Funding of college scholarships and support of university programs.

Education

University of Tulsa

The University of Tulsa is a student-centered research university that cultivates interconnected learning experiences to explore complex ideas and create new knowledge in a spirit of free inquiry. Guided by our commitment to diversity,…

Education

Oklahoma Wesleyan University

Christian education of students

Education

Mercy Hospital Oklahoma City

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

Health

South Central Oklahoma Christian

To spread the gospel of jesus through music to thousands of listeners on a daily basis, to nurture spiritual growth, and provide an alternative to secular music.

—

Junior League of Oklahoma City

The junior league of oklahoma city, oklahoma, incorporated, is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement

Oklahoma Blood Institute

To be the donor to patient lifeline by meeting blood transfusion and health care needs.

Health

Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation

Arts & Culture

Oklahoma State University Foundation

Unite donor passions with university priorities to elevate the impact of oklahoma state university.

Education

The Dallas Opera

Performance of opera productions, education and community engagement programs.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth and Family Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is North Central College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/46

the rest of the field

14%

5,110/37,714

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

42 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

42/42

Grantees still filing

35/42

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$6,200,079Education$1,281,200Human Services$519,250Arts & Culture$444,402Environment$378,800Health$125,000Housing & Shelter$115,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK55.6× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Kerr Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Love Family Affiliated Fund · The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation · Love Meyer Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Robert Glenn Rapp Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

20get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: OKLAHOMA ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 731194142 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on OKLAHOMA ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 41% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Robert Glenn Rapp Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Robert Glenn Rapp Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Robert Glenn Rapp Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

42 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Robert Glenn Rapp Foundation?

More from the funding graph

Robert Glenn Rapp Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

42 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Robert Glenn Rapp Foundation?

More from the funding graph