Skip to content
Robert G Rogers & Jane E Rogers Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Robert G Rogers & Jane E Rogers Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$25kReligion$9kHealth$5kPhilanthropy$5kEducation$4kHuman Services$1kCivil Rights$1kFood & Nutrition$220Other$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$121
Median grant
8
States reached
$122k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$4,100
TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL$3,600
STUDIO 23 ARTS CENTER$2,082
ART ALLIANCE FOR CONTEMPORARY GLASS$1,325
THE ROTARY CLUB OF BC CHARITABLE FD$421
NORTHEASTERN MICHIGAN JEWISH WELFAR$300
SVSU FOUNDATION$250
BAY AREA WOMENS CENTER$121
WHEATON ARTS$100
MILTON ACADEMY$100
MS SOCIETY$100
CORNING MUSEUM OF GLASS$65
SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER$60
AIPAC$50
HILLEL INTERNATIONAL$36
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MILTON ACADEMY: $115 → 7%MAIN LINE ART CENTER: $100 → 10%NORTHEASTERN MICHIGAN JEWISH WELFAR: $300 → 17%ART ALLIANCE FOR CONTEMPORARY GLASS: $2k → 14%MICHIGAN JEWISH FOUNDATION: $100 → 8%EPILOPSY FOUNDATION: $150 → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $4k → 14%TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL: $4k → 14%WHEATON ARTS: $100 → 16%ALS ASSOCIATION: $100 → 7%MILTON ACADEMY: $100 → 7%NORTHEASTERN MICHIGAN JEWISH WELFAR: $300 → 17%ART ALLIANCE FOR CONTEMPORARY GLASS: $1k → 14%MICHIGAN JEWISH FOUNDATION: $100 → 8%EPILOPSY FOUNDATION: $150 → 11%ALUMNI ASSOC OF UNIVERSITY OF MI: $3k → 14%STUDIO 23 ARTS CENTER: $3k → 14%WHEATON ARTS: $100 → 16%MILTON ACADEMY: $100 → 7%ART ALLIANCE FOR CONTEMPORARY GLASS: $1k → 14%TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL: $3k → 14%ART ALLIANCE FOR CONTEMPORARY GLASS: $1k → 14%STUDIO 23 ARTS CENTER: $2k → 14%ART ALLIANCE FOR CONTEMPORARY GLASS: $1k → 14%TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL: $2k → 14%ART ALLIANCE FOR CONTEMPORARY GLASS: $1k → 14%STUDIO 23 ARTS CENTER: $2k → 14%ART ALLIANCE FOR CONTEMPORARY GLASS: $1k → 14%STUDIO 23 ARTS CENTER: $850 → 14%ART ALLIANCE FOR CONTEMPORARY GLASS: $1k → 14%STUDIO 23 ARTS CENTER: $800 → 14%STUDIO 23 ARTS CENTER: $700 → 14%STUDIO 23 ARTS CENTER: $360 → 14%STUDIO 23 ARTS CENTER: $205 → 14%BAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200 → 14%TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL: $172 → 14%SVSU FOUNDATION: $250 → 14%SVSU FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%SVSU FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%SVSU FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%MARSHALL FREDERICKS MUSEUM: $450 → 14%MARSHALL FREDERICKS MUSEUM: $200 → 14%BAY AREA WOMENS CENTER: $295 → 14%BAY AREA WOMENS CENTER: $160 → 14%BAY AREA WOMENS CENTER: $150 → 14%BAY AREA WOMENS CENTER: $121 → 14%BAY CITY GARDEN CLUB: $110 → 14%BAY CITY GARDEN CLUB: $110 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
VA
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$41k · 24 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
13

Total granted

$41k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+33%

Still filing today

38%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHealthCivil RightsInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ART ALLIANCE FOR CONTEMPORARY GLASS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +26%
  • BA
    BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1k · revenue +50%
  • MILTON ACADEMY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $515 · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • AA
    ALUMNI ASSOC OF UNIVERSITY OF MI
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • UO
    UNIV OF MICHIGAN JAFFE RESEARCH FD
    one grant, 2020 · $100
  • AL
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSNgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100 · revenue +72%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
Association for Computing Machinery Inc

We are an intl. scientific & educational org. dedicated to advancing art, science & technology.

Science & Tech
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
8
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
9
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
10
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
11
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
12
The Contemporary Jewish Museum

The contemporary jewish museum (the cjm) makes the diversity of the jewish experience relevant for a twenty-first-century audience through innovative exhibitions and programs that educate, challenge, and inspire.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Simon Wiesenthal Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bay Arts Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
16/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STUDIO 23 ARTS CENTER: $9,042 · OtherSTUDIO 23 ARTS CENTERTEMPLE BETH ISRAEL: $7,908 · OtherTEMPLE BETH ISRAELUniversity of Michigan: $4,100 · OtherUniversity of MichiganSVSU FOUNDATION: $3,750 · OtherSVSU FOUNDATIONTHE ROTARY CLUB OF BC CHARITABLE FD: $3,716 · OtherTHE ROTARY CLUB OF BC CHARITABLE FDALUMNI ASSOC OF UNIVERSITY OF MI: $3,493 · OtherALUMNI ASSOC OF UNIVERSITY OF MI+22 more: $5,562 · Other+22 moreART ALLIANCE FOR CONTEMPORARY GLASS: $10,125 · Arts & CultureART ALLIANCE FOR CONTEMP…SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $480 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $316 · Arts & CultureMILTON ACADEMY: $515 · EducationSWARTHMORE COLLEGE: $200 · EducationBAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $400 · PhilanthropyANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $200 · Civil RightsAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $100 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50 · HealthHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $144 · ReligionThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $25 · International
Other$37,571Arts & Culture$10,921Education$715Philanthropy$400Civil Rights$200Health$150Religion$144International$25

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetART ALLIANCE FOR CONTEMPORARY GLASS: $10,125 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $4,100 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER: $1,126 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMILTON ACADEMY: $515 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CORNING MUSEUM OF GLASS: $485 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $480 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $216 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSWARTHMORE COLLEGE: $200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBAY ARTS COUNCIL: $150 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $144 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAID FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $50 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ART ALLIANCE FOR CONTEMPORARY GLASS ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MILTON ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE CORNING MUSEUM OF GLASS ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds SWARTHMORE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BAY ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds Main Line Art Center ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds AID FOR CANCER RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert G Rogers & Jane E Rogers Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert G Rogers & Jane E Rogers Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Milton Academy: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert G Rogers & Jane E Rogers Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home