Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert G and Florence E Van Duyn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$150k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$426kReligion$348kHuman Services$171kYouth Development$46kHealth$41kFood & Nutrition$30kInternational$7kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $94k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
$4,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Archbishop of the Diocese of NY NJ$23,500
Berea College$20,000
Individual grant recipient$13,000
First Presbyterian Church$9,500
Lowville Food Pantry Inc$9,000
Several Sources Foundation$9,000
St Hermans Theological Seminary$8,000
Hindman Settlement School$6,000
Sisters of Saint Joseph Rochester$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Angel of Mercy Inc$4,500
Isaiah House$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
The Childrens Agenda$4,000
Lewis County Hospital Foundation$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Sierra House: $1k → 16%The Childrens Agenda: $6k → 14%The Childrens Agenda: $6k → 14%The Childrens Agenda: $5k → 14%The Childrens Agenda: $4k → 14%The Childrens Agenda: $4k → 14%The Childrens Agenda: $4k → 14%The Childrens Agenda: $4k → 14%The Childrens Agenda: $4k → 14%The Childrens Agenda: $3k → 14%Isaiah House: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MI
NY
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
KY
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 23 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
1

Total granted

$1.0M
$5k

Still filing today

39%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BEREA COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $123k · revenue +50%
  • TC
    The Children's Agenda Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +65%
  • LF
    LOWVILLE FOOD PANTRY INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $30k · revenue +179%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lighthouse Christian Home and Services Inc

For god's love to be expressed for and by individuals with developmental disabilities through faith based programs and services.

Human Services
2
Sarah's Guest House Inc

This healthcare hospitality house provides a "home away from home" accomodations to patients and families of patients who are receiving medical care in central new york.

Human Services
3
Indiana United Methodist Children's Home Inc

To meet the special needs of each child and family served in order to help improve their quality of life. the board of trustees and staff members of the home are committed to bringing the highest quality resources available to the…

Human Services
4
Christian Care Communities Inc Group Return

Christian care communities enhances the journey of life for those we serve. recognizing the unique needs of each individual christian care offers an array of housing and care options including independent living. 24-hour skilled nursing…

Human Services
5
Hospice of Southern Kentucky Inc

The hospice mission is to honor life through exceptional service and compassionate care. the organization is primarily engaged in providing care and support that enables the terminally ill to spend their final days in a comfortable and…

—
6
David's House

To provide quality care, facilities, and supportive services for adults with a developmental disability, traumatic brain injury or mental illness. being enabled by god, we strive to provide an intentionally christian environment and…

—
7
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
8
Developmental Disabilities Management Assistance Inc

Carolina hill provides safe and caring emergency shelter and supportive services to homeless families focusing efforts to achieve rapid re-housing and developing skills and resources to maintain it.

Human Services
9
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
10
Hospice of Wake County Inc

To care for individuals and families with compassion, support, and expertise as they navigate the end of life or life-changing illness.

—
11
David's House Ministries

To provide quality care, facilities and supportive services for adults with a developmental disability, traumatic brain injury or mental illness. being enabled by god, we strive to provide an intentionally christian environment and program…

Housing & Shelter
12
Isaiah House Inc

Isaiah house strives to help individuals struggling with general life challenges, specifically substance abuse and addiction by providing a christian, faith-based intervention and recovery residential treatment program. the goal is to…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Health Care Center; the most unlike its peers is Center for Garden State Families. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Archbishop of the Diocese of NY NJ: $156,500 · OtherArchbishop of the Diocese of NY NJIndividual grant recipient: $123,620 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFirst Presbyterian Church: $110,680 · OtherFirst Presbyterian ChurchLe Ray De Chaumont Chapter NSD: $94,000 · OtherLe Ray De Chaumont Chapter NSDSEVERAL SOURCES SHELTERS INC: $82,181 · OtherSEVERAL SOURCES SHELTERS INCST HERMANS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $57,131 · OtherST HERMANS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARYSisters of Saint Joseph Rochester: $42,245 · OtherANGEL OF MERCY INC: $40,745 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $29,149 · Other+9 more: $88,647 · Other+9 moreBEREA COLLEGE: $123,000 · EducationBEREA COLLEGEHINDMAN SETTLEMENT SCHOOL INC: $6,000 · EducationThe Children's Agenda Inc: $40,245 · Human ServicesIsaiah House Inc: $4,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesLOWVILLE FOOD PANTRY INC: $30,219 · Food & NutritionWALTER HOVING HOME INC DBA HOVING HOME: $14,700 · HealthLEWIS COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · HealthChristian Health Care Center: $1,300 · HealthNEW CITY KIDS INC: $10,200 · Youth DevelopmentINTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN ADOPTIONS INSTITUTE FOR CHILDRENS AID: $6,500 · InternationalCENTER FOR GARDEN STATE FAMILIES: $5,000 · Religion
Other$824,898Education$129,000Human Services$45,245Food & Nutrition$30,219Health$19,500Youth Development$10,200International$6,500Religion$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBEREA COLLEGE: $123,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSEVERAL SOURCES SHELTERS INC: $82,181 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetThe Children's Agenda Inc: $40,245 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetLOWVILLE FOOD PANTRY INC: $30,219 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetWALTER HOVING HOME INC DBA HOVING HOME: $14,700 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNEW CITY KIDS INC: $10,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN ADOPTIONS INSTITUTE FOR CHILDRENS AID: $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHINDMAN SETTLEMENT SCHOOL INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR GARDEN STATE FAMILIES: $5,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetChristian Health Care Center: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BEREA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SEVERAL SOURCES SHELTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Agenda Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOWVILLE FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds WALTER HOVING HOME INC DBA HOVING HOME ↗
  • Who funds NEW CITY KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN ADOPTIONS INSTITUTE FOR CHILDRENS AID ↗
  • Who funds HINDMAN SETTLEMENT SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR GARDEN STATE FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds Isaiah House Inc ↗
  • Who funds LEWIS COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Christian Health Care Center ↗
  • Who funds Sierra House Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert G and Florence E Van Duyn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert G and Florence E Van Duyn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sierra House Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Christian Health Care Center: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert G and Florence E Van Duyn’s filings →

More from the funding graph