Skip to content
Robert D & Margaret W Quin Foundation Attn Lusberty de la Cruz at a glance

· Private foundation

Robert D & Margaret W Quin Foundation Attn Lusberty de la Cruz

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$116kHuman Services$56kRecreation & Sports$39kEducation$37kPhilanthropy$33kHousing & Shelter$20kYouth Development$6kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$31k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAN DO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$8,000
CAMP ORCHARD HILL INC$7,000
CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF HAZELTO$6,000
HAZLETON ART LEAGUE INC$6,000
LEADERSHIP HAZLETON$6,000
PENNSYLVANIA THEATRE OF PERFORMING$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CAN DO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 15%HAZLETON ART LEAGUE INC: $6k → 15%LEADERSHIP HAZLETON: $6k → 15%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF HAZELTO: $6k → 15%FERRWOOD MUSIC CAMP: $6k → 15%HAZLETON YMCA: $5k → 15%FERRWOOD MUSIC CAMP: $5k → 15%HAZLETON YMCA: $5k → 15%FERRWOOD MUSIC CAMP: $5k → 15%PENNSYLVANIA THEATRE OF PERFORMING: $4k → 15%HAZLETON ENLARGED MINISTRY: $1k → 15%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $100 → 15%CAMP ORCHARD HILL INC: $7k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$264k · 36 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
40

Total granted

$264k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+41%

Still filing today

14%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY OF LUZERNE COUNTY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +12%
  • HI
    HAZLETON INTEGRATION PROJECT INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $18k · revenue +76%
  • CO
    CAMP ORCHARD HILL INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $12k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • DH
    DOWNTOWN HAZLETON ALLIANCE FOR PROG
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • HA
    HAZLETON ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • MA
    MINING AND MECHANICAL INSTITUTE MMI PREPARATORY SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hackensack Performing Arts Center Inc

Community arts and education

Arts & Culture
2
Hazelton Development Corp

Economic Development

Community Improvement
3
Gilbert Productions Inc

Musical proformance education.

Arts & Culture
4
The Helping Hands Society of Hazleton Area Schuylkill and Carbon County Inc

--to provide training and therapy services for disabled children and adults in luzerne, schuylkill, and carbon counties in pennsylvania.

Human Services
5
Huntingdon County Child and Adult Development Corporation

The primary purpose is to administer the head start program, subsidized daycare, and child and adult programs in huntingdon county.

Education
6
Hazel Park Promise Zone Authority

The Hazel Park Promise Zone Authority provides financial assistance and other forms of academic-achievement support to assist students of the Hazel Park School District in pursuing higher education at an accredited college, university or…

Education
7
Harmony School of Creative Arts

Community Education in the Performing and Visual Arts

Arts & Culture
8
Hartington Creative Council
Public Benefit
9
Tour-Ed Mine & Museum
Arts & Culture
10
Queens Community Center Inc

It is a trade and business school. It offers English as Second Language, pharmacy technician, home health aide, office technology and accounting programs.

Education
11
Hunterdon Polytech Education Association

N/a

Education
12
Hazleton Cemetery Association

Providing cemetery and mausoleum facilities

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Commission On Economic Opportunity of Luzerne County; the most unlike its peers is Hazleton Art League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $26,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF HAZELTO: $26,000 · OtherCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF HAZELTOHAZLETON SCHOOL DISTRICT: $15,000 · OtherHAZLETON SCHOOL DISTRICTJUNIOR LEADERSHIP OF HAZLETON: $15,000 · OtherJUNIOR LEADERSHIP OF HAZLETONDOWNTOWN HAZLETON ALLIANCE FOR PROG: $10,000 · OtherHEIGHTS-TERRACE ELEMENTARYMIDDLE SC: $10,000 · OtherLA CASA DOMINICANA DE HAZLETON INC: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherHAZLETON ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY: $7,500 · Other+63 more: $83,322 · Other+63 moreHAZLETON ART LEAGUE: $26,000 · Arts & CultureHAZLETON A…PENNSYLVANIA THEATRE OF PERFORMING: $4,000 · Arts & CulturePENNSYLVAN…CAN DO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterHAZLETON INTEGRATION PROJECT INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesCAMP ORCHARD HILL INC: $12,000 · Youth Development
Other$212,922Arts & Culture$30,000Philanthropy$25,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Human Services$18,000Youth Development$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAZLETON ART LEAGUE: $26,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetCAN DO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHAZLETON INTEGRATION PROJECT INC: $18,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCAMP ORCHARD HILL INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMINING AND MECHANICAL INSTITUTE MMI PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Social Services: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAZLETON ART LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds CAN DO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY OF LUZERNE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds HAZLETON INTEGRATION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP ORCHARD HILL INC ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP HAZLETON ↗
  • Who funds MINING AND MECHANICAL INSTITUTE MMI PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA THEATRE OF PERFORMING ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sidney and Lillian Kl…Hannah S & Samuel Coh…Allone CharitiesThe Luzerne FoundationAmerican Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Sidney and Lillian Klemow Foundation IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sidney and Lillian Klemow Foundation Inc · Hannah S & Samuel Cohn Memorial Fndn · Allone Charities · The Luzerne Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert D & Margaret W Quin Foundation Attn Lusberty de la Cruz funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert D & Margaret W Quin Foundation Attn Lusberty de la Cruz. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert D & Margaret W Quin Foundation Attn Lusberty de la Cruz?

    Find your warmest path to Robert D & Margaret W Quin Foundation Attn Lusberty de la Cruz through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert D & Margaret W Quin Foundation Attn Lusberty de la Cruz’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home