Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert & Sheila Chamovitz Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$56k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$59kHuman Services$9kCivil Rights$6kArts & Culture$3kHealth$2kFood & Nutrition$2kPublic Benefit$1kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM$10,000
ADAS ISRAEL CONGREGATION$7,630
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$5,000
HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF PGH$5,000
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN$3,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID AD$2,000
CONGREGATION DOR HADASH$2,000
NA'AMAT USA$2,000
JEWISH BROADCASTING SERVICES$2,000
JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING$2,000
FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH$2,000
HILLEL INTERNATIONAL$2,000
B'NAI B'RITH INTERNATIONAL$2,000
PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$1,517
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $2k → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $1k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICE: $100 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$64k · 25 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
13

Total granted

$64k
$732

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+52%

Still filing today

36%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthReligionHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +213%
  • GP
    GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    4× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +91%
  • NY
    NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $1k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $118
  • C6
    CONGREGATION 6TH AND I
    one grant, 2021 · $100
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGHgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100 · revenue +52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
3
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
4
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
5
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
6
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
8
United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc

Uja-federation of new york (uja) cares for jews everywhere and new yorkers of all backgrounds, responds to crises close to home and far away, and shapes the jewish future. through strategic grantmaking, uja provides funding and resources…

Philanthropy
9
Jewish Council for Public Affairs Inc

The mission of the jewish council for public affairs (jcpa) is to strengthen and leverage the jewish community relations network across the nation to champion a just, democratic and pluralistic society and advance the right of full…

—
10
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
11
The Jewish Community Center in Manhattan Inc

Together with our community, jcc manhattan creates opportunities for people to connect, grow, and learn within an ever-changing jewish landscape.

Human Services
12
The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc

Since 1914, the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee (JDC) has acted on behalf of North America's Jewish communities and others to fulfill the principle that "kol Yisrael arevim zeh l'zeh" - all Jews are responsible for one…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Simon Wiesenthal Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Nature Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM: $27,229 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH SHALOMADAS ISRAEL HEBREW CONGREGATION: $10,810 · OtherADAS ISRAEL HEBREW CONGREGATIONHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF PGH: $5,000 · OtherHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF PGHCONGREGATION DOR HADASH: $4,350 · OtherCONGREGATION DOR HADASH+36 more: $18,832 · Other+36 moreNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN PITTSBURGH SECTION: $5,750 · Community ImprovementAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $5,000 · Civil RightsJEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $3,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $2,000 · ReligionYIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC: $1,000 · ReligionFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $2,226 · Health+1 more: $72 · HealthGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $1,867 · Food & Nutrition
Other$66,221Community Improvement$5,750Civil Rights$5,000Human Services$3,100Religion$3,000Health$2,298Food & Nutrition$1,867

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN PITTSBURGH SECTION: $5,750 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $2,226 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $1,867 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $1,130 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATION IN MEDIA INC DBA JBS JEWISH BROADCASTING SERVICE: $204 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $180 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY: $136 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN PA INC: $72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN PITTSBURGH SECTION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds YIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH EDUCATION IN MEDIA INC DBA JBS JEWISH BROADCASTING SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY ASSISTANCE FUND dba JEWISH ASSISTANCE FUND ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN PA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

David S Shapira FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: David S Shapira Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert & Sheila Chamovitz Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert & Sheila Chamovitz Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert & Sheila Chamovitz Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph