Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert and Patricia Ludlow Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$131kEducation$26kArts & Culture$23kHealth$18kPhilanthropy$15kHuman Services$15kMembership Benefit$7kYouth Development$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k24 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$819k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOVE INC OF WORTHINGTON$10,000
LIVING WATERS COVENANT CHURCH$5,000
GRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH$5,000
NAVIGATORS$5,000
SOLID ROCK ASSEMBLY CHURCH$5,000
WORTHINGTON CEMETERY ASSOCIATION$3,000
ELIC$2,500
NOBLES COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,078
NEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION$2,000
PROJECT ONE EIGHT$2,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$1,500
U OF MN CFANS$1,000
ECHO$1,000
CLIENT COMMUNITY SERVICES$1,000
BYRON BIBLE CAMP$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LOVE INC OF WORTHINGTON: $10k → 11%LOVE INC OF WORTHINGTON: $10k → 11%LOVE INC OF WORTHINGTON: $10k → 11%LOVE INC OF WORTHINGTON: $10k → 11%LOVE INC OF WORTHINGTON: $10k → 11%YOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%LOVE INC OF WORTHINGTON: $10k → 11%YOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%YOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%CLIENT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 11%CLIENT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 11%CLIENT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 11%CLIENT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 11%CLIENT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 11%CLIENT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
SD
IA
CO
VA
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$263k · 31 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
6

Total granted

$263k
$13k

Still filing today

52%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureInternationalReligionEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LI
    LOVE INC OF WORTHINGTON
    6× · 2019–2024 · $60k · revenue +1%
  • WR
    WORTHINGTON REGIONAL HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +162%
  • WC
    WORTHINGTON CEMETERY ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2019–2024 · $7k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • FC
    FIRST COVENANT CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • C
    CRU
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • Y
    YMCA
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Young Life

Young life is a ministry to help adolescents around the world become exposed to the person of jesus christ. this is accomplished in a variety of ways desgined to provide personal, religious experiences. (continued on schedule o)included…

Youth Development
2
Whitworth University

Since 1890, whitworth has held fast to its founding mission of providing "an education of mind and heart" through rigorous intellectual inquiry guided by dedicated christian scholars.

Education
3
Northeastern Seminary

Northeastern seminary strives to be a vibrant source for christian theological formation whose students are formed in a biblical vision of gracious christianity and impact wholeness to the world in an expansive array of vocations and…

Education
4
United Church of Christ Homes Inc

In the spirit of christ's love, the ministry of united church of christ homes is to provide care and service to elders through acts of love and compassion.

Human Services
5
Ohio Living Communities

See schedule oohio living communities was founded in 1922 and was incorporated as an ohio non-profit corporation in 1959. the corporation's mission statement is as follows:our mission is to provide older adults with caring and quality…

Human Services
6
Wheaton College

Wheaton College serves Jesus Christ and advances His kingdom through excellence in liberal arts and graduate programs that educate the whole person to build the church and benefit society worldwide.

Education
7
Wayland Baptist University

Wayland baptist university exists to educate students in an academically challenging, learning focused and distinctively christian environment for professional success and service to god and humankind.

Education
8
Benedictine Living Community - Owatonna

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

—
9
Wisconsin Christian Campus Ministries Inc

Our mission is to advance the gospel of jesus christ through the next generation by engaging the lost and discipling believers on college campuses.

Religion
10
Wesley Retirement Services Inc

Guided by christian compassion, wesleylife supports the independence, health, and well-being of older adults wherever they call home. as a non-profit organization, we understand our responsibility and obligation to operate with…

Human Services
11
Houghton University

Houghton university provides an academically challenging, christ-centered education in the liberal arts and sciences to students from diverse traditions and economic backgrounds and equips them to lead and labor as scholar-servants in a…

Education
12
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Love Inc of Worthington; the most unlike its peers is Echo Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NAVIGATORS: $27,700 · OtherTHE NAVIGATORSWorthington Christian School Society: $15,000 · OtherWorthington Christian School SocietySOLID ROCK ASSEMBLY CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherSOLID ROCK ASSEMBLY CHURCHGRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherGRACE COMMUNITY CHURCHNobles County Historical Society: $11,078 · OtherNobles County Historical SocietyWORTHINGTON CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $7,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $6,500 · OtherWORTHINGTON AREA FOUNDATION: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherMISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP: $5,700 · Other+21 more: $55,800 · Other+21 moreLOVE INC OF WORTHINGTON: $60,000 · Human ServicesLOVE INC OF WORTHINGTONCLIENT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesCLIENT COMMUNITY SERVICES I…YOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION: $4,200 · Human ServicesYOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION+1 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesWORTHINGTON REGIONAL HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 · PhilanthropyThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $6,200 · PhilanthropyARTIS-NAPLES INC: $11,000 · Arts & CultureWorthington Area Symphony Orchestra: $1,000 · Arts & CultureECHO Inc: $5,000 · InternationalENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE IN CHINA: $2,500 · InternationalPROCLAIM AVIATION MINISTRIES INC: $5,700 · ReligionUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Education
Other$170,778Human Services$71,700Philanthropy$19,200Arts & Culture$12,000International$7,500Religion$5,700Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOVE INC OF WORTHINGTON: $60,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetWorthington Christian School Society: $15,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWORTHINGTON REGIONAL HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetNobles County Historical Society: $11,078 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORTHINGTON CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $7,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $6,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCLIENT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPROCLAIM AVIATION MINISTRIES INC: $5,700 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY CONNECTION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetBYRON BIBLE CAMP: $5,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetECHO Inc: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION: $4,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE IN CHINA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWorthington Area Symphony Orchestra: $1,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOVE INC OF WORTHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds Worthington Christian School Society ↗
  • Who funds WORTHINGTON REGIONAL HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Nobles County Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds ARTIS-NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds WORTHINGTON CEMETERY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLIENT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds PROCLAIM AVIATION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds BYRON BIBLE CAMP ↗
  • Who funds ECHO Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE IN CHINA ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Worthington Area Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA6.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert and Patricia Ludlow Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert and Patricia Ludlow Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert and Patricia Ludlow Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph