How much did ROBERT & NANCY CAMPBELL FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

ROBERT & NANCY CAMPBELL FOUNDATION reported 18 grants totaling $102,500 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is ROBERT & NANCY CAMPBELL FOUNDATION based?

ROBERT & NANCY CAMPBELL FOUNDATION is based in NJ.

ROBERT & NANCY CAMPBELL FOUNDATION

Foundation Dossiers

· Private foundation

ROBERT & NANCY CAMPBELL FOUNDATION

This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.

$103k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$18k

Largest

01What you fund

0171% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.

Health$226kAnimals$90kArts & Culture$33kPublic Benefit$33kEducation$17kHuman Services$16kFood & Nutrition$15kEnvironment$8kInternational$5kOther$186k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

international

2021

san diegohumane

2022

aspenhumanesan diego

2023

aspen

2024

aspenhumane

2025

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k14 grants · $55k
$10k–50k4 grants · $48k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.3M

Total assets

Largest grants

CORONADO HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$17,500
LIONS TIGERS & BEARS$10,000
SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE ASPEN ANIMAL SHELTER$6,600
JAZZ AT ASPEN - SNOWMASS$5,400
MUTTVILLE$5,000
C4 FOUNDATION$5,000
DOLPHINS PLUS OCEANSIDE MARINE$5,000
JUDICIAL WATCH INC$5,000
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION$5,000
FRESH START SURGICALGIFTS$5,000
NEW JERSEY AUDUBON SOCIETY$3,000
CORONADO PROMENADE CONCERTS$2,000
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAB RETRIEVER RESCUE$2,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$570k · 30 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$570k

$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%

+108%

Still filing today

73%

69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

AnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CH
CORONADO HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
5× · 2020–2024 · $226k · revenue +39%
CS
CORONADO SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
4× · 2020–2023 · $57k · revenue +122%
JUDICIAL WATCH INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $23k · revenue +141%

Funded once

SD
SAN DIEGO POLICE OFFICERS ASSOC
one grant, 2021 · $5k
SD
SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCAgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +108%
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHENgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +1417%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

San Diego Society of Natural History

To interpret the natural world through research, education and exhibits; to promote understanding of the evolution and diversity of southern california and the peninsula of baja california; and to inspire in all a respect for nature and…

Arts & Culture

Santa Cruz Co Animal Shelter Foundation

To support santa cruz county animal services authority through education, public awareness, fund raising, support of current projects, and establishment of new projects.

Animals

Safe Harbor Animal Sanctuary

Animals

Monterey Zoological Society Inc

Our goal is to educate visitors about the challenges facing both captive and wild animals to increase understanding and support while promoting conservation. monterey zoological society strives to maintain a diverse group of wildlife…

Animals

The Humane Society of Boulder

Our mission: to protect and enhance the lives of companion animals by promoting healthy relationships between pets and people. hsbv is an open admission, socially conscious shelter. hsbv provides safety net services, comprehensive adoption…

Animals

Chicago Zoological Society

To inspire conservation leadership by connecting people with wildlife and nature.

Animals

Humane Society of Southern Arizona

Compassionately serving pets and the people who love them.

Animals

Corazon Puro

Equip youth, young adults, and families in vulnerable communities with leadership skills and resources necessary to restore family life and positively transform society.

—

National Foundation for Rescued Animals

To provide a safe and secure environment for animals in need of rescue or rehabilitation while conserving endangered and threatened species. our slogan is "saving animals one by one."

Animals

North Bay Animal Services

Animals

Felines & Friends New Mexico

Felines & friends is a "second chance" rescue and placement organization focusing on providing vet care and socialization for cats and kittens who might not otherwise find homes through animal shelters. since 2002, we have placed over…

Animals

Arizona Humane Society

Mission: To save the most vulnerable animals and enrich the lives of pets and people.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Humane Association and the most unlike its peers is Citymeals-On-Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/32

the rest of the field

12%

22,290/186,946

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

32/32

Grantees still filing

28/32

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$225,500Other$214,100Animals$89,600Arts & Culture$33,300Public Benefit$33,000Education$17,000Human Services$16,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

L Robert & Patricia Payne FamilyCA13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: L Robert & Patricia Payne Family · The San Diego Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ROBERT & NANCY CAMPBELL FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CORONADO SCHOOLS FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~9 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.2× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 942745484 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CORONADO SCHOOLS FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 9 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Robert & Nancy Campbell Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Robert & Nancy Campbell Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ROBERT & NANCY CAMPBELL FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Robert & Nancy Campbell Foundation?

More from the funding graph

ROBERT & NANCY CAMPBELL FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Robert & Nancy Campbell Foundation?

More from the funding graph