Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert & Kathey Anderson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$478k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.2MHealth$512kHuman Services$465kPublic Benefit$371kFood & Nutrition$215kCivil Rights$185kHousing & Shelter$160kArts & Culture$137kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $310k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONCORDIA LUTHERAN CHURCH$100,000
SAN ANTONIO HUMANE SOCIETY$25,000
UT HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER$25,000
SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK$20,000
TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE$20,000
HAVEN FOR HOPE$20,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$20,000
MERCY SHIPS$20,000
TURNING POINT$20,000
DOCTOR'S WITHOUT BORDERS USA$10,000
SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRY$10,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$10,000
THE NATIONAL WWII MUSEUM$10,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$10,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HERITAGE FOUNDATION USA: $40k → 8%HERITAGE FOUNDATION USA: $5k → 8%CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $10k → 16%CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $10k → 16%CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $10k → 16%CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $10k → 16%BOYSVILLE INC: $4k → 16%BOYSVILLE INC: $4k → 16%BOYSVILLE INC: $3k → 16%BOYSVILLE INC: $2k → 16%BOYSVILLE INC: $2k → 16%BOYSVILLE INC: $2k → 16%BOYSVILLE INC: $2k → 16%BOYSVILLE INC: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
CA
MO
VA
DE
AZ
TN
NC
DC
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 62 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

62 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
2

Total granted

$3.8M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
0%

Still filing today

58%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public BenefitHealthHuman ServicesReligionEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $165k · revenue +63%
  • HF
    Haven for Hope of Bexar County
    8× · 2017–2025 · $110k · revenue +38%
  • PC
    Pregnancy Care Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $100k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES UPBRING
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • TP
    TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
3
Uatx

Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…

Education
4
Texas Medical Association

The texas medical association (tma), the nation's largest and one of the oldest state medical societies, represents over 59,000 physicians and medical students dedicated to enhancing the health of all texans. in collaboration with 110…

—
5
Greater Austin Christian Foundation

Mobilizing resources by inspiring biblical generosity in the greater austin, texas area.

Religion
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
The Association of Former Students of Texas a&M University

To strengthen the association of former students, promote the interests and welfare of texas a&m university, perpetuate ties of affection and esteem formed in university or college days, and serve the student body.

Education
8
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
9
San Antonio Medical Foundation

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.

Health
10
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Heritage Foundation Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/43
Grantees still filing
27/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONCORDIA LUTHERAN CHURCH: $893,000 · OtherCONCORDIA LUTHERAN CHURCHTURNING POINT: $185,000 · OtherTURNING POINTSALVATION ARMY: $180,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYSAA MINISTRIES: $150,000 · OtherTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER: $105,700 · OtherPregnancy Care Center: $100,000 · Other+45 more: $1,275,000 · Other+45 moreTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $165,000 · Public BenefitTAX FOUNDATION: $39,500 · Public BenefitLeadership Institute: $37,500 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $36,000 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTE: $30,000 · Public Benefit+1 more: $5,000 · Public BenefitLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTH INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesHERITAGE FOUNDATION USA: $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $40,000 · Human ServicesBOYSVILLE INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesDallas Theological Seminary: $95,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $60,000 · EducationINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC: $20,500 · EducationTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $60,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $30,000 · HealthSOUTH TEXAS BLOOD & TISSUE CENTER: $30,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $26,000 · HealthTHE BLOOD & TISSUE CENTER FOUNDATION: $15,000 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $90,000 · InternationalMercy Ships International: $30,000 · InternationalHaven for Hope of Bexar County: $110,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,888,700Public Benefit$313,000Human Services$185,000Education$175,500Health$161,000International$120,000Housing & Shelter$110,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $165,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHaven for Hope of Bexar County: $110,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPregnancy Care Center: $100,000 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetDallas Theological Seminary: $95,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $90,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $90,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTH INC: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO RIVER FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $60,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLOS COMPADRES DE SAN ANTONIO: $50,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetHERITAGE FOUNDATION USA: $45,000 over 2y, 74% of budgetLOVE WORTH FINDING MINISTRIES INC: $42,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTAX FOUNDATION: $39,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLeadership Institute: $37,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $36,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT): $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Cultural Arts in San Antonio dba Las Casas Foundation: $30,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS BLOOD & TISSUE CENTER: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHARITY BALL ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetPrecept: $29,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $26,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC: $20,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBOYSVILLE INC: $20,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH: $18,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTE: $18,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BLOOD & TISSUE CENTER FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE JOSHUA FUND: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROY MAAS' YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS HISTORICAL FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetKLRN ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHADES OF GREEN LEGACY FOUNDATION SHADES OF GREEN LEGACY FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Haven for Hope of Bexar County ↗
  • Who funds Pregnancy Care Center ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Theological Seminary ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO RIVER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS COMPADRES DE SAN ANTONIO ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds LOVE WORTH FINDING MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds TAX FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT) ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Cultural Arts in San Antonio dba Las Casas Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX29.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Amy Shelton McNutt Charitable Trust · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Cb and Anita Branch Trust James L Drought Trustee · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · McCombs Foundation Inc · John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324 · Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600 · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert & Kathey Anderson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert & Kathey Anderson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert & Kathey Anderson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Robert & Kathey Anderson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert & Kathey Anderson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph