Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert and Dolores Buril Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$438kHuman Services$247kReligion$77kHousing & Shelter$43kHealth$42kCivil Rights$20kCommunity Improvement$20kCrime & Legal$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $83k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL$20,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$15,000
OUR LADY OF PEACE$15,000
Individual grant recipient$12,500
ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
ALEXANDRA HOUSE$10,000
RISEN CHRIST CATHOLIC SCHOOL$7,500
CHRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
WOMENS ADVOCATES$2,500
PAWSITIVE PERSPECTIVES ASSISTANCE$2,500
HELPING HANDS HEALING HOOVES$2,500
JEREMIAH PROGRAM$1,500
THE DRAWER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $103k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THE DRAWER: $1k → 6%ALEXANDRA HOUSE: $10k → 7%OUR LADY OF PEACE: $15k → 11%PAWSITIVE PERSPECTIVES ASSISTANCE: $3k → 6%ALEXANDRA HOUSE: $7k → 7%OUR LADY OF PEACE: $10k → 11%ALEXANDRA HOUSE: $7k → 7%OUR LADY OF PEACE: $10k → 11%ALEXANDRA HOUSE: $5k → 7%OUR LADY OF PEACE: $10k → 11%ALEXANDRA HOUSE: $5k → 7%OUR LADY OF PEACE: $10k → 11%OUR LADY OF PEACE: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$803k · 19 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
8

Total granted

$803k
$65k

Still filing today

37%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OL
    OUR LADY OF PEACE
    6× · 2019–2025 · $65k · revenue +76%
  • EL
    Elevate Life
    6× · 2018–2023 · $34k · revenue +34%
  • AH
    ALEXANDRA HOUSE INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $34k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES HOPE STREET
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST PAUL AND M
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women Winning

To encourage, promote, support, and elect pro-choice women of all political parties to all levels of public office in minnesota.

Public Benefit
2
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
3
Benedictine Living Community of St Peter

Benedictine living community - st. peter is a catholic organization entrusted with advancing the health care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. our mission is to witness to god's love by providing compassionate,…

—
4
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
5
Madonna Meadows of Rochester

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

—
6
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
7
Benedictine Senior Living Community of St Peter Dba Benedictine Court

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

—
8
Missions Inc Programs

See Schedule O.Established in 1895, Missions Inc. Programs is a multi-service non-profit organization with a long history of providing services to those who are most in need, each year offering thousands of people, whose lives have been…

—
9
Planned Parenthood North Central States Foundation

To build and maintain financial support for planned parenthood north central states to advance and protect sexual and reproductive health care for all.

Human Services
10
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

—
11
The Dwelling Place

The Dwelling Place is a Christ-centered ministry providing healing and hope to victims of domestic abuse through supportive services and a safe, transitional place to call home.

Human Services
12
Lutheran Social Services Housing Inc

Lss housing will support the continued vitality of north dakota communities by providing housing and housing-related services.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Our Lady of Peace; the most unlike its peers is Helping Hands Healing Hooves Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL: $176,000 · OtherRED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOLST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY: $70,000 · OtherST JOHN'S UNIVERSITYST JOSEPH'S HOME FOR CHILDREN: $55,000 · OtherST JOSEPH'S HOME FOR CHILDRENCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF MINNEAPOLIS & ST PAUL HOPE STREET SHELTER: $40,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF MINNEAPOLIS & ST PAUL HOPE STREET SHELTERRISEN CHRIST SCHOOL: $37,500 · OtherRISEN CHRIST SCHOOLLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $35,000 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POORST THOMAS ACADEMY: $35,000 · OtherST THOMAS ACADEMYST JOSEPH CHURCH: $30,000 · Other+16 more: $158,500 · Other+16 moreCOLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT: $70,000 · EducationCOLLEGE OF S…Presentation College: $30,000 · EducationPresentation…+1 more: $2,500 · EducationOUR LADY OF PEACE: $65,000 · Human ServicesOUR LADY OF …ALEXANDRA HOUSE INC: $34,000 · Human ServicesALEXANDRA HO…+2 more: $3,500 · Human ServicesElevate Life: $34,000 · HealthNATIVE ACTION INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentGREATER MINNEAPOLIS COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $20,000 · ReligionWOMEN'S ADVOCATES INC: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $1,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$637,000Education$102,500Human Services$102,500Health$34,000Youth Development$20,000Religion$20,000Housing & Shelter$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOUR LADY OF PEACE: $65,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetElevate Life: $34,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetALEXANDRA HOUSE INC: $34,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPresentation College: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE ACTION INC: $20,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetGREATER MINNEAPOLIS COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPAWSITIVE PERSPECTIVES ASSISTANCE DOGS: $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWOMEN'S ADVOCATES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT ↗
  • Who funds OUR LADY OF PEACE ↗
  • Who funds Elevate Life ↗
  • Who funds ALEXANDRA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Presentation College ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MINNEAPOLIS COUNCIL OF CHURCHES ↗
  • Who funds Helping Hands Healing Hooves Inc ↗
  • Who funds PAWSITIVE PERSPECTIVES ASSISTANCE DOGS ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds The Drawer ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Catholic Community Foundation of MinnesotaMN21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · United Way Worldwide · The US Charitable Gift Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert and Dolores Buril Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert and Dolores Buril Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert and Dolores Buril Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Robert and Dolores Buril Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert and Dolores Buril’s filings →

    More from the funding graph