Skip to content

· Private foundation

RNR Parker Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$64kFood & Nutrition$31kArts & Culture$13kEducation$10kPublic Benefit$5kEnvironment$3kHealth$1kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$341k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Union Church$6,400
West Valley Community Services$2,600
Second Harvest$1,500
South Bay Musical Theatre$1,000
West Valley Light Opera$1,000
Mayville State University$500
Rancho Cielo Youth Campus$500
Friends of Stevens Creek Trail$500
Pembina Inc$500
Fort Pembina Historical Society$250
Foxworthy Baptist Church$250
Foothill Conservancy$250
KQED$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%American Red Cross: $250 → 14%American Red Cross: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$126k · 17 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
7

Total granted

$126k
$3k

Still filing today

41%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WV
    WEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +125%
  • SB
    SOUTH BAY MUSICAL THEATRE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +216%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $525 · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • AC
    Almaden Country School
    one grant, 2018 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $500
  • CR
    Cupertino Rotary Endowment Foundati
    one grant, 2023 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sempervirens Fund

To ensure coast redwood forests in the santa cruz mountains thrive for generations to come. since 1900, sempervirens has protected more than 36,000 acres. learn more about our mission, vision, and strategic plan through 2030 at:…

Environment
2
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
5
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
6
Nature Collective

Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…

Environment
7
Chile-California Council

The Chile-California Council is a San Francisco-based nonprofit dedicated to developing and promoting joint endeavors and cooperative relations between Chile and California, as well as individuals, legal entities and other institutions in…

International
8
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

—
9
Peninsula Open Space Trust

Post protects open space on the peninsula and in the south bay for the benefit of all. post is creating a network of protected lands where people and nature connect and thrive. these lands are preserved forever so present and future…

Environment
10
Save Mount Diablo

Save mount diablo's mission is to preserve mount diablo's peaks, surrounding foothills, and watersheds; and its sustaining diablo range, through land acquisition and preservation strategies designed to protect the mountain's natural…

Recreation & Sports
11
Environmental Defense Center

The organization protects and enhances the local environment through education, advocacy and legal action.

Crime & Legal
12
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Valley Community Services of Santa Clara County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fort Pembina Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Union Church: $60,800 · OtherUnion ChurchSecond Harvest: $7,000 · OtherSecond HarvestMayville State University: $6,000 · OtherMayville State UniversityWest Valley Light Opera: $5,000 · OtherSOUTH BAY MUSICAL THEATRE: $5,000 · OtherPembina Inc: $4,500 · Other+13 more: $9,750 · Other+13 moreWEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC: $23,800 · Housing & ShelterWEST VALLEY COMMUNIT…Foothill Conservancy: $2,250 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $525 · EnvironmentKQED INC: $2,250 · Arts & CultureFort Pembina Historical Society: $250 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF STEVENS CREEK TRAIL: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 · Human ServicesRANCHO CIELO INC: $500 · Youth Development
Other$98,050Housing & Shelter$23,800Environment$2,775Arts & Culture$2,500Recreation & Sports$1,000Human Services$500Youth Development$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC: $23,800 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH BAY MUSICAL THEATRE: $5,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetKQED INC: $2,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFoothill Conservancy: $2,250 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF STEVENS CREEK TRAIL: $1,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $525 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO CIELO INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH BAY MUSICAL THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds Foothill Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF STEVENS CREEK TRAIL ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO CIELO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Fort Pembina Historical Society ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization RNR Parker Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from RNR Parker Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on RNR Parker Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph