Skip to content
Rnb Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Rnb Foundation

To advance and promote the growth of the kingdom of god by providing support to other charitable and like-minded organizations and churches.

$477k
Granted FY2020
6
Grants FY2020
4
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

91% of Rnb Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Servant Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Rnb Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $477k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’19
6
’20
2
’21
1
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Religion$1.4MPhilanthropy$605kYouth Development$115kCrime & Legal$16k
02FY2020 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $77k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $400k
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPPER ROOM MISSIONS$200,000
BETHEL CHURCH$200,000
J HUGHES FOUNDATION$30,000
HARVEST HILL CHURCH$25,000
THAT NONE SHOULD PERISH$12,000
YOUTH WITH A MISSION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 44% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%BETHEL CHURCH: $200k → 14%UPPER ROOM MISSIONS: $200k → 14%RIVERS OF LIFE CHURCH: $25k → 9%HARVEST HILL CHURCH: $25k → 9%EUROPEAN INITIATIVE: $50k → 11%YOUTH WITH A MISSION: $55k → 12%EUROPEAN INITIATIVE: $100k → 14%THE GOOD FIGHT FOUNDATION: $16k → 17%J HUGHES FOUNDATION: $50k → 15%IMPACT FOUNDATION: $515k → 5%THAT NONE SHOULD PERISH: $12k → 8%ISAAC TV INC: $175k → 19%HARVEST HILL CHURCH: $25k → 9%YOUTH WITH A MISSION: $50k → 12%J HUGHES FOUNDATION: $30k → 15%THE SIGNATRY: $505k → 5%THAT NONE SHOULD PERISH: $12k → 8%YOUTH WITH A MISSION: $10k → 12%J HUGHES FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%TRINITY FELLOWSHIP CHURCH: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$429k · 5 repeat orgs$641k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +4% since the first grant, against -51% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$429k
$241k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
-51%

Still filing today

40%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
ReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EI
    EUROPEAN INITIATIVE
    2× · 2019–2021 · $150k · revenue +4%
  • YW
    YOUTH WITH A MISSION - MADISON INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $115k · revenue -33%
  • JH
    J HUGHES FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $90k · revenue +203% · 32% of their budget

Funded once

  • IT
    Isaac TV INC
    one grant, 2019 · $175k · revenue -51% · 92% of their budget
  • TF
    TRINITY FELLOWSHIP CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • RO
    RIVER OF LIFE CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
2
Global Gospel Initiative Inc
Religion
3
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
4
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
5
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
6
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
7
Jessica Yoon Ministries

Spread the Christianity

Religion
8
Eyewitness Missions
Philanthropy
9
Impact Ministries with the Michalski

Christian Mission in Russia, Eastern Europe, Central Asia to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ via crusades, to plant Christian churches, to train local pastors/ministers and to distribute the Bible. In addition, to provide humanitarian…

International
10
Jesus Said Go
Religion
11
Evangelism Partners International
Religion
12
Euromedia Missions
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is European Initiative; the most unlike its peers is Isaac Tv Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Servant Foundation: $504,887 · ReligionServant FoundationEUROPEAN INITIATIVE: $150,000 · ReligionEUROPEAN INITIATIVEYOUTH WITH A MISSION - MADISON INC: $115,000 · ReligionYOUTH WITH A MISSION - MADISON INCJ HUGHES FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 · ReligionJ HUGHES FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $24,000 · ReligionUPPER ROOM MISSIONS: $200,000 · OtherUPPER ROOM MISSIONSBETHEL CHURCH OF REDDING: $200,000 · OtherBETHEL CHURCH OF REDDINGIsaac TV INC: $175,000 · OtherIsaac TV INCHARVEST HILL CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherHARVEST HILL CHURCHTRINITY FELLOWSHIP CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherRIVER OF LIFE CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherIMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $515,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE …+1 more: $16,000 · Philanthropy
Religion$883,887Other$675,000Philanthropy$531,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $515,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetServant Foundation: $504,887 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIsaac TV INC: $175,000 over 1y, 92% of budgetEUROPEAN INITIATIVE: $150,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetYOUTH WITH A MISSION - MADISON INC: $115,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetJ HUGHES FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 over 3y, 32% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…Renaissance Charitabl…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rnb Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rnb Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rnb’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home