Skip to content
Rmh Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Rmh Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

International$75kCivil Rights$40kCrime & Legal$34kHealth$30kEducation$23kHuman Services$10kArts & Culture$10kEnvironment$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$681k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADL (ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE)$10,000
THE FRICK COLLECTION$10,000
SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION$2,100
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE$2,000
EACH - EAST AFRICA CHILDRENS' HOPE INC$2,000
ECPAT-USA$2,000
BOSTON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%East Africa Childrens Hope Inc: $3k → 17%East Africa Childrens Hope Inc: $3k → 17%EAST AFRICA CHILDRENS' HOPE INC: $3k → 17%EAST AFRICA CHILDRENS' HOPE INC: $2k → 17%EAST AFRICA CHILDRENS' HOPE INC: $2k → 17%EAST AFRICA CHILDRENS' HOPE INC: $2k → 17%EAST AFRICA CHILDRENS' HOPE INC: $2k → 17%EACH - EAST AFRICA CHILDRENS' HOPE INC: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CT
CA
VA
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$152k · 9 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$152k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+22%

Still filing today

78%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalCrime & LegalHuman ServicesEducationHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BOSTON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $20k · revenue +245%
  • EI
    ECPAT-USA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +185%
  • SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +47%
  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI HEALTH - ICAHN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • SP
    SOUTHERN PROVERY LAW CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
2
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Arrow

To make grants to charitable organizations and programs that support the achievement of sexual and reproductive health (srh) of the poor & underprivileged women and others in the asia-pacific and elsewhere.

International
5
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
6
The Advocates for Human Rights

To promote and protect human rights in the United States and around the world.

International
7
Parliamentarians for Global Action

Parliamentarians for global action (pga) is a non-partisan ngo network of legislators from all regions of the world acting in their individual capacity to advocate for human rights, democracy, and the rule of law; peace and human security;…

International
8
The Center for Reproductive Rights Inc

The center for reproductive rights ("the center") is an international non-governmental organization that uses the power of law to advance reproductive rights as fundamental human rights around the world.

Civil Rights
9
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
10
Women in Global Health Inc

Women in global health (wgh) is a global movement and organization that brings together all genders and backgrounds to achieve gender equality in global health leadership.

Public Benefit
11
Equality Now Inc

To achieve legal and systematic change that addresses violence and discrimination against women and girls around the world.

International
12
Women's Rights Without Frontiers International

Women's rights without frontiers, international ("wrwf- or "the organization") is a nonprofit entity supporting the rights of women and girls, first in china, then in other countries' communities. the organization was founded by regina…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Prrowess Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
7/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADL (ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE): $30,000 · OtherADL (ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE)THANKS USA: $15,000 · OtherTHANKS USAThe Frick Collection: $10,000 · OtherThe Frick CollectionMOUNT SINAI HEALTH - ICAHN SCHOOL: $7,500 · OtherMOUNT SINAI HEALTH - ICAHN SCHOOLSOUTHERN PROVERY LAW CENTER (SPLC): $7,500 · OtherSOUTHERN PROVERY LAW CENTER (SPLC)JDC (JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION CMTE): $4,000 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC: $7,500 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN …ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $3,000 · Other+1 more: $2,500 · OtherWORLD ASSISTANCE FOR CAMBODIA INC: $20,790 · InternationalWORLD ASSISTANCE FOR CAMBOD…AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $20,500 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVI…ECPAT-USA INC: $12,500 · InternationalECPAT-USA INCSave The Children Federation Inc: $4,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federatio…EAST AFRICA CHILDRENS HOPE INC: $17,500 · Human ServicesEAST AFRICA C…SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY FOR…SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $19,600 · Crime & LegalSANDY HOOK P…V-Day: $7,000 · Crime & LegalV-DayBOSTON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS INC: $19,500 · HealthBOSTON CO…ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $10,000 · Civil RightsCOUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $7,500 · Environment
Other$87,000International$57,790Human Services$27,500Crime & Legal$26,600Health$19,500Civil Rights$10,000Environment$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD ASSISTANCE FOR CAMBODIA INC: $20,790 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $20,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $19,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS INC: $19,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetEAST AFRICA CHILDRENS HOPE INC: $17,500 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetTHANKS USA: $15,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetECPAT-USA INC: $12,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Frick Collection: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetV-Day: $7,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRROWESS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rmh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rmh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Boston Community Pediatrics Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rmh’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home