How much did RLC Family Foundation grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 82% of RLC Family Foundation’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2021

christchurch

2022

—

2023

againstdomestic violence

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $5k
$10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$50k–250k19 grants · $1.8M
$250k+2 grants · $945k

$80,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.6M

Total assets

Largest grants

The Policy Project$675,000
The Other Side Village$270,000
Prevent Child Abuse Utah$215,000
Family Support Center$150,000
Utah Domestic Violence Coalition$150,000
Dahlias Hope$150,000
Saprea$145,250
Roots Charter High School$120,000
The Dove Center$100,700
Asian Association of Utah$100,000
Common Thread Community for Teens$85,000
Wasatch Forensic Nurses$80,000
One Refugee$75,000
Voices for Utah Children$75,000
YWCA$75,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $351k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7% — the area typically sits at 7%. 86% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$4.1M · 16 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +159% since the first grant, against +95% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$4.1M

$10M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+159%

+95%

Still filing today

56%

21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $886k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TP
The Policy Project
2× · 2023–2024 · $900k · revenue +6199% · 27% of their budget
PC
Prevent Child Abuse Utah
4× · 2020–2024 · $540k · revenue +159%
DB
Danielle Bryon Henry Migraine Foundation
5× · 2020–2024 · $300k · revenue +61% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

LC
LDS Church
one grant, 2020 · $5.0M
CO
Corporation of the President Church of Jesus Christ
one grant, 2021 · $5.0M
UC
Utah Coalition Against Sexual Assaultgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $101k · revenue +166%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Utah Valley Family Support Center Inc

Provide Services to Victims and Potential Victims of Child Abuse and Neglect

—

Utah Domestic Violence Advisory

The organization's mission is to end domestic violence in utah through advocacy, education, collaboration, and leadership. the organization is the nationally recognized domestic violence coalition for the state of utah.

Crime & Legal

Utah Support Advocates for Recovery

To connect and inspire communities to advocate for addiction recovery.

Health

Utah's Promise

We build powerful cross-sector partnerships to help every utahn achieve their potential.

Philanthropy

Utah Association of Family Support

He mission of the uafsc is to strengthen utah families one community at a time by supporting parents, protecting children, and preserving families. to accomplish this mission, each family support center provides its clients with a 24-hour…

—

Northern Utah Sexual Assault

To provide forensic exams by qualified nurse examiners to provide evidence for law enforcement agencies in weber, morgan, and davis counties, utah.

Human Services

Safe Kids Utah

To educate the community on safety, using partnerships, programs, training and events to help prevent future injuries and improve public health.

Public Safety & Disaster

Utah Health Policy Project

To advance sustainable health care solutions for underserved utahns through better access, education, and public policy.

Health

Utah Children Dba Voices for Utah Childr

Utah children works to improve the lives of children by advocating for effective public policies. we make a difference by raising awareness through research and advocacy, influencing policy and bringing the power of our community together.

Civil Rights

Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault

The agency provides services to victims of domestic violence and sexual assault including crisis intervention, safety planning, medical and legal advocacy, adult and youth support groups, and community prevention education. the agency…

Health

Utah Humanities Council

Utah Humanities strengthens Utah communities by cultivating connections, deepening understanding, and exploring our complex human experience.

Arts & Culture

Utah Dispute Resolution

Utah Dispute Resolution exists to provide residents of Utah with quality mediation services, information and training in dispute resolution, and the means to successfully, informally and cooperatively resolve disputes.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Coalition Against Sexual and the most unlike its peers is Danielle Byron Henry Migraine Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

18/18

Grantees still filing

14/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$12,673,500Public Benefit$900,000Health$625,250Education$455,500Human Services$350,700Housing & Shelter$244,601Crime & Legal$110,000Arts & Culture$100,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT18× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · The Community Foundation of Utah · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation RLC Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Danielle Bryon Henry Migraine Foundation.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~45 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +61% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 823689521 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Danielle Bryon Henry Migraine Foundation, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 45 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 30% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to RLC Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to RLC Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

RLC Family Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to RLC Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

RLC Family Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to RLC Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph