· Private foundation
RLC Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
- $50k–250k19 grants · $1.8M
- $250k+2 grants · $945k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Policy Project | $675,000 |
| The Other Side Village | $270,000 |
| Prevent Child Abuse Utah | $215,000 |
| Family Support Center | $150,000 |
| Utah Domestic Violence Coalition | $150,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $150,000 |
| Saprea | $145,250 |
| Roots Charter High School | $120,000 |
| The Dove Center | $100,700 |
| Asian Association of Utah | $100,000 |
| Common Thread Community for Teens | $85,000 |
| Wasatch Forensic Nurses | $80,000 |
| One Refugee | $75,000 |
| Danielle Bryon Henry Migraine Foundation | $75,000 |
| YWCA | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $351k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $886k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PCPREVENT CHILD ABUSE UTAH4× · 2020–2024 · $540k · revenue +480%
- GEGranite Education Foundation2× · 2022–2023 · $303k · revenue +112%
- DBDanielle Byron Henry Migraine Foundation5× · 2020–2024 · $300k · revenue +123% · 30% of their budget
Funded once
- COCorporation of the President Church of Jesus Christone grant, 2021 · $5.0M
- LCLDS Churchone grant, 2020 · $5.0M
- UCUTAH COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULTone grant, 2023 · $101k · revenue +6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our Mission is to drastically minimize the generational impact of sexual violence through advocacy and healing by breaking the cycle of generational trauma through advocacy, awareness, and change.
Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.
Friends Against Family Violence (FAFV) is a community based nonprofit domestic violence program. FAFV provides services, shelter, crisis intervention, and prevention in the Tri-County of Uintah, Duchesne, and Daggett. We provide services…
Utah Homicide Survivors provides holistic legal representation to families of homicide victims.
Provide services to victims and potential victims of child abuse and neglect.
Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…
The primary purpose of Trauma-Informed Utah is to respond to requests for education, resources and training around implementing a Trauma-Informed approach within their organization. The focus includes any and all sectors of society seeking…
S.a.f.e. house is a community based non-profit organization committed to stop abuse in the family environment by providing a comprehensive approach to end domestic violence that includes crisis intervention, safe shelter, counseling,…
Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…
Provide a caring, advocating, safe, and educationally based environment for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault.
We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Coalition Against Sexual Assault and the most unlike its peers is Onerefugee. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 23% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE POLICY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds PREVENT CHILD ABUSE UTAH ↗
- Who funds Granite Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds Danielle Byron Henry Migraine Foundation ↗
- Who funds The Other Side Academy ↗
- Who funds UTAH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ADVISORY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds DOVE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds Onerefugee ↗
- Who funds Saprea ↗
- Who funds Utah Children ↗
- Who funds ROOTS CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds UTAH COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT ↗
- Who funds ASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH ↗
- Who funds WASATCH FORENSIC NURSES INC ↗
- Who funds Fight Against Domestic Violence ↗
- Who funds Peace House Inc ↗
- Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PHASE Alliance ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE ↗
- Who funds KENYA KEYS ↗
- Who funds OPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Best Seat in the House ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · American Express Foundation · Utah Medical Association Foundation · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · Making a Difference Foundation · Joel and Diana Peterson Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization RLC Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to RLC Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to RLC Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.