Skip to content

· Private foundation

River Branch Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10M
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$18MArts & Culture$6.1MAnimals$2.3MHuman Services$2.2MEducation$1.3MPublic Benefit$650kCivil Rights$500kPhilanthropy$500kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+12 grants · $9.1M
$230,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CONSERVATION FUND$2,000,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION$1,060,000
TAOS LAND TRUST$1,020,000
HUNTERDON LAND TRUST$1,000,000
AUDUBON FLORIDA$1,000,000
ALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST$620,000
JACKSONVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$500,000
NATURECONNECT FLORIDA$500,000
ECOFLIGHT$430,000
WJCT INC$400,000
ST JOHN'S RIVERKEEPER$300,000
Individual grant recipient$250,000
1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA$230,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES USA$200,000
EVERGLADES FOUNDATION$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $260k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LIFECAMP INC: $250k → 4%CLARA WHITE MISSION: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MT
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
NM
DC
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 25 repeat orgs$9.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
20

Total granted

$23M
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+14%

Still filing today

68%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VS
    VERMONT STUDIO CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $5.9M · revenue +120% · 39% of their budget
  • NF
    NORTH FLORIDA LAND TRUST INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $2.9M · revenue +67% · 52% of their budget
  • AC
    ALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • G
    GREENSCAPE
    one grant, 2024 · $525k
  • THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $500k · revenue -18%
  • CC
    CHATHAM CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $500k · revenue -40% · 60% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Florida Conservation Group Inc

Mission is to seek protection of land and water resources through restoration and conservation; and conducting education and outreach on the ecological and economic importance of natural lands. we protect land from development and protect…

Environment
2
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
3
New Jersey Conservation Foundation

Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…

Environment
4
Archbold Expeditions Inc

Archbold expeditions, inc.'s mission is to build and share the scientific knowledge needed to protect the life, lands, and waters of the heart of florida and beyond.

Unclassified
5
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
6
Conservation Florida Inc

Conservation florida's mission is to permanently protect florida's water, wildlife, and wild places - the places that make florida home.

Environment
7
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
8
The Conservancy of Southwest Florida

We are a grassroots organization focused on the critical environmental issues of sw florida. we accomplish this through a myriad of efforts by the teams in our programmatic departments: science, policy, education and wildlife…

—
9
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
10
Florida Wildlife Federation

To safeguard Florida's water, wildlife, and wild spaces by taking action today to prevent irreversible loss tomorrow.

Animals
11
Nature Collective

Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…

Environment
12
Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc

In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Natureconnect Florida Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/40
Grantees still filing
27/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH FLORIDA LAND TRUST INC: $2,879,600 · EnvironmentNORTH FLORIDA LAND TRUST INCALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST INC: $2,570,000 · EnvironmentALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST INCTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $2,000,000 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATIONTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $1,475,000 · EnvironmentTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INCRARITAN HEADWATERS ASSOCIATION: $1,125,000 · EnvironmentRARITAN HEADWATERS ASSOCIATIONJACKSONVILLE ARBORETUM & BOTANICAL: $1,120,000 · EnvironmentJACKSONVILLE ARBORETUM & BOTANICALTAOS LAND TRUST: $1,020,000 · EnvironmentTAOS LAND TRUSTHUNTERDON LAND TRUST: $1,000,000 · EnvironmentHUNTERDON LAND TRUSTST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC: $740,000 · EnvironmentECOFLIGHT: $720,000 · Environment+8 more: $1,880,000 · Environment+8 moreVERMONT STUDIO CENTER INC: $5,900,000 · OtherVERMONT STUDIO CENTER INCAUDUBON FLORIDA: $2,150,000 · OtherAUDUBON FLORIDAIndividual grant recipient: $1,167,554 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWJCT INC: $650,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $550,000 · OtherGREENSCAPE: $525,000 · OtherJACKSONVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500,000 · Other+24 more: $2,384,422 · Other+24 moreUNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $1,060,000 · EducationCONCORD ACADEMY: $140,000 · EducationTHE WILLOW SCHOOL INC: $50,000 · Education+1 more: $30,000 · EducationTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $500,000 · Civil RightsFLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC: $350,000 · Science & TechLIFE CAMP INC: $250,000 · Human ServicesCLARA WHITE MISSION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesHUBBARD HOUSE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC: $100,000 · Health
Environment$16,529,600Other$13,826,976Education$1,280,000Civil Rights$500,000Science & Tech$350,000Human Services$270,000Health$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVERMONT STUDIO CENTER INC: $5,900,000 over 8y, 39% of budgetNORTH FLORIDA LAND TRUST INC: $2,879,600 over 5y, 52% of budgetALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST INC: $2,570,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $2,000,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $1,475,000 over 9y, 5.6% of budgetRARITAN HEADWATERS ASSOCIATION: $1,125,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetJACKSONVILLE ARBORETUM & BOTANICAL: $1,120,000 over 4y, 38% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $1,060,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetHUNTERDON LAND TRUST: $1,000,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC: $740,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetECOFLIGHT: $720,000 over 9y, 26% of budgetWJCT INC: $650,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetNATURECONNECT FLORIDA INC: $500,000 over 1y, 83% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $500,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHATHAM CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 over 1y, 60% of budgetFLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC: $350,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budget1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA INC: $310,000 over 6y, 9.7% of budgetPlant a Million Corals Foundation Inc: $300,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $250,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE CAMP INC: $250,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetNATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN: $155,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION INC: $150,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetCONCORD ACADEMY: $140,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNew Jersey Audubon Society: $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSt Francis House: $95,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetRodale Institute: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE WILLOW SCHOOL INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGROUNDWORK JACKSONVILLE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCLARA WHITE MISSION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHUBBARD HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVETERINARY INITIATIVE FOR ENDANGERED WILDLIFE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCENTER FOR PLANT CONSERVATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VERMONT STUDIO CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH FLORIDA LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds ALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RARITAN HEADWATERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds JACKSONVILLE ARBORETUM & BOTANICAL ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TAOS LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds HUNTERDON LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC ↗
  • Who funds ECOFLIGHT ↗
  • Who funds WJCT INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURECONNECT FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHATHAM CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds 1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds Plant a Million Corals Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds LIFE CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCORD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST FLORIDA JOURNALISM COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds New Jersey Audubon Society ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida IncFL25.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · Fidelity Foundation · Jwb Cares Inc · The Maryellen S Willis Charitable Trust · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Hicks Charitable Foundation · The Schultz Foundation Inc · The Haskell Foundation · Felburn Foundation · Csx Foundation Inc · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization River Branch Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from River Branch Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Raritan Headwaters Association: 94% of income from government
  • North Florida Land Trust Inc: 81% of income from government
  • Hunterdon Land Trust: 48% of income from government
  • Hubbard House Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of South Florida and the Treasure Coast Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Alachua Conservation Trust Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Life Camp Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Groundwork Jacksonville Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Vermont Studio Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • New Jersey Audubon Society: 1% of income from government
  • Clara White Mission Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Florida Oceanographic Society Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to River Branch Foundation?

Find your warmest path to River Branch Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on River Branch’s filings →

More from the funding graph