Skip to content

· Private foundation

Riter Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$543k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.4MHuman Services$843kHealth$477kYouth Development$431kInternational$244kReligion$235kCrime & Legal$225kArts & Culture$224kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $275k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $260k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$110,000
STARBRITE THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CE$100,000
PROMISE ACADEMY$50,000
THE MENTORING ALLIANCE$35,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
PATH$25,000
HOPE HAVEN OF EAST TEXAS$25,000
THE FOSTERING COLLECTIVE$25,000
SALVATION ARMY$20,000
YOUNG LIFE$20,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$20,000
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF SMITH$15,000
SIGHTORG$15,000
BRIDGES TO LIFE$10,000
EDUCATIONAL RADIO FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $453k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST PAUL CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $110k → 12%SELAH LIFE CHOICES: $50k → 13%INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $5k → 14%MIRACLE LEAGUE OF TYLER: $100k → 12%EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER: $30k → 12%PATH: $30k → 12%PATH: $25k → 12%THE FOSTERING COLLECTIVE: $25k → 12%THE FOSTERING COLLECTIVE: $25k → 12%PATH: $20k → 12%EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER: $10k → 12%PATH: $5k → 12%EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 30 repeat orgs$842k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
23

Total granted

$3.5M
$682k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+18%

Still filing today

67%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $160k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationCrime & LegalReligionHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MENTORING ALLIANCE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $380k · revenue +287%
  • PA
    PROMISE ACADEMY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $370k · revenue +284%
  • CA
    CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF SMITH COUNTY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $170k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • FI
    FAMILY INDEPENDENCE INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2020 · $150k
  • SP
    ST PAUL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $110k · revenue -60%
  • ML
    MIRACLE LEAGUE OF TYLER
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Retreat Home for Children

Our mission is to show the love of christ to each and every child and family towhom we serve and beyond. we do this by creating a culture where the needs of children,families, and staff are seen and met in creative and innovative ways.

Crime & Legal
2
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
3
Children to Love International

Children to love is focused on meeting the needs of the suffering children of the world, providing help and assistance to empower 'the least of these'(matthew 25:40). through education, spiritual teaching, economic support, physical…

International
4
Louisiana Baptist Childrens Home and Family Ministries

To provide love, care, and a positive christian witness for children and families in need.

—
5
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
6
El Paso Area Christian Counseling Service

Counseling Services offering hope, healing, and restoration to hurting people, marriages, and families using respected therapy practices and solid biblical principles.

Human Services
7
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
8
Tip of Texas Family Outreach Inc

To strengthen families through parenting classes educational programs, youth programs and referral services for the prevention of child abuse and neglect.

—
9
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
10
Children At Heart Ministries Inc

Children at heart ministries is a family of christian ministries that exists to honor god and build a better world by serving children and strengthening families.

Human Services
11
Childrens Advocacy Center of Van Zandt County Inc

The children's advocacy center of van zandt county is committed to ensuring quality services and support to those children impacted by abuse while also building a future where no child in van zandt county experiences abuse.

Human Services
12
Child Evangelism Fellowship of Sc Inc

Child evangelism fellowship is a bible centered organization composed of born again believers whose purpose is to evangelize children with the gospel of the lord jesus christ and to establish them in the word of god.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Children's Advocacy Center; the most unlike its peers is Luis Palau Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
25/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRACE COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $637,000 · OtherGRACE COMMUNITY SCHOOLEDUCATIONAL RADIO FOUNDATION: $215,000 · OtherEDUCATIONAL RADIO FOUNDATIONALZHEIMERS ALLIANCE: $212,000 · OtherALZHEIMERS ALLIANCEALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $170,000 · OtherALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL SCHOOLFAMILY INDEPENDENCE INITIATIVE: $150,000 · OtherFAMILY INDEPENDENCE INITIATIVESTARBRITE THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CE: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $97,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS: $96,000 · OtherREGIONAL EAST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $85,000 · OtherFamily Legacy Missions International: $78,800 · OtherEdify: $80,000 · Other+20 more: $406,299 · Other+20 moreST PAUL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $110,000 · Human ServicesST PAUL CHILD…MIRACLE LEAGUE OF TYLER: $100,000 · Human ServicesMIRACLE LEAGU…PATH - PEOPLE ATTEMPTING TO HELP: $80,000 · Human ServicesPATH - PEOPLE…LIVING ALTERNATIVES INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesLIVING ALTERN…EAST TEXAS ORPHAN CARE NETWORK INC DBA THE FOSTERING COLLECTIVE: $50,000 · Human ServicesEAST TEXAS OR…SELAH LIFE CHOICES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesSELAH LIFE CH…EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesEAST TEXAS CR…+2 more: $17,500 · Human ServicesPROMISE ACADEMY: $370,001 · EducationPROMISE ACADE…SMITH COUNTY CHAMPIONS FOR CHILDREN INC: $91,000 · EducationSMITH COUNTY …LITERACY COUNCIL OF TYLER DBA PAVE EAST TEXAS: $50,000 · EducationLITERACY COUN…+1 more: $15,000 · EducationMENTORING ALLIANCE: $380,000 · Youth DevelopmentMENTORING A…YOUNG LIFE: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFECHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF SMITH COUNTY: $170,000 · Crime & LegalBRIDGES TO LIFE: $40,000 · Crime & LegalTAPKARD INC: $25,000 · Crime & LegalHOPE INC: $25,000 · Crime & LegalSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $140,000 · ReligionLuis Palau Association: $25,000 · ReligionWOMENARY INC: $20,000 · ReligionBETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC: $115,500 · HealthZERO PROSTATE CANCER: $15,000 · HealthChildren are a Gift Foundation: $5,000 · Health
Other$2,327,099Human Services$527,500Education$526,001Youth Development$430,000Crime & Legal$260,000Religion$185,000Health$135,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMENTORING ALLIANCE: $380,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetPROMISE ACADEMY: $370,001 over 7y, 11% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF SMITH COUNTY: $170,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $140,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC: $115,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetST PAUL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $110,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetMIRACLE LEAGUE OF TYLER: $100,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetHOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS: $96,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSMITH COUNTY CHAMPIONS FOR CHILDREN INC: $91,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetREGIONAL EAST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $85,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPATH - PEOPLE ATTEMPTING TO HELP: $80,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetEdify: $80,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFamily Legacy Missions International: $78,800 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLIVING ALTERNATIVES INC: $75,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEAST TEXAS ORPHAN CARE NETWORK INC DBA THE FOSTERING COLLECTIVE: $50,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetSELAH LIFE CHOICES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetLITERACY COUNCIL OF TYLER DBA PAVE EAST TEXAS: $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetEAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER INC: $45,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBRIDGES TO LIFE: $40,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCASA FOR KIDS OF EAST TEXAS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSIGHT ORG: $25,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTAPKARD INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Smith County: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLuis Palau Association: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE INC: $25,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZERO PROSTATE CANCER: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetChildren are a Gift Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetINTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDISCOVERY PLACE INC DBA THE DISCOVERY SCIENCE PLACE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MENTORING ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds PROMISE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF SMITH COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds ST PAUL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE LEAGUE OF TYLER ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds SMITH COUNTY CHAMPIONS FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL EAST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PATH - PEOPLE ATTEMPTING TO HELP ↗
  • Who funds Edify ↗
  • Who funds Family Legacy Missions International ↗
  • Who funds LIVING ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds EAST TEXAS ORPHAN CARE NETWORK INC DBA THE FOSTERING COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds SELAH LIFE CHOICES INC ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY COUNCIL OF TYLER DBA PAVE EAST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES TO LIFE ↗
  • Who funds CASA FOR KIDS OF EAST TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SIGHT ORG ↗
  • Who funds TAPKARD INC ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Smith County ↗
  • Who funds Luis Palau Association ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMENARY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Texas Communities FoundationTX46.3× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Texas Communities Foundation · Ben and Maytee Fisch Foundation · The Rogers Foundation · A S Genecov Foundation · Hibbs Family Foundation · James I Perkins Family Foundation · The Junior League of Tyler Inc · Byers Family Foundation · Bob L Herd Foundation · Etx Successor System · The Louis and Peaches Owen Family Foundation · Wolf Benevolent Tua

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Riter Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Riter Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Riter Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph