Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ritchie-Kirk Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$210kHealth$139kFood & Nutrition$39kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kCrime & Legal$17kPhilanthropy$17k
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$178k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SEEING EYE$15,000
SEATTLE ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION$3,000
SERENITY STABLES COMBAT TO CALM$3,000
TESS MCINTYRE FOUNDATION$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
COURTHOUSE DOGS FOUNDATION$3,000
THE ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC$2,750
REDROVER$2,500
NEIGHBOR GOOD$2,500
SECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION AND PLACEMENT INC$2,500
WISKERS RESCUE INC$2,500
CAUSE 4 PAWS PET FOOD BANK$2,500
NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION INC$2,250
MADISON COMMUNITY CATS$1,500
LUNCH BREAK$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 48% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%CAUSE 4 PAWS PET FOOD BANK: $5k → 11%TRI-CITY PANTRY: $3k → 6%NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%TESS MCINTYRE FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%REDROVER: $6k → 12%COURTHOUSE DOGS FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%THE ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $6k → 4%SERENITY STABLES COMBAT TO CALM: $6k → 6%SECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION AND PLACEMENT INC: $5k → 8%POPCORN PARK ZOO: $6k → 11%POPCORN PARK ZOO: $5k → 16%MADISON COMMUNITY CATS: $5k → 11%CAUSE 4 PAWS PET FOOD BANK: $4k → 11%NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 10%TESS MCINTYRE FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%REDROVER: $5k → 12%COURTHOUSE DOGS FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%THE ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $5k → 4%SERENITY STABLES COMBAT TO CALM: $5k → 6%SECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION AND PLACEMENT INC: $4k → 8%POPCORN PARK ZOO: $5k → 11%CAUSE 4 PAWS PET FOOD BANK: $4k → 11%NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 10%TESS MCINTYRE FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%REDROVER: $5k → 12%COURTHOUSE DOGS FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%THE ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $5k → 4%SERENITY STABLES COMBAT TO CALM: $5k → 6%SECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION AND PLACEMENT INC: $4k → 8%POPCORN PARK ZOO: $5k → 11%NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 10%THE ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $5k → 4%SECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION AND PLACEMENT INC: $4k → 8%POPCORN PARK ZOO: $5k → 11%SEATTLE HUMANE: $6k → 9%THE ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $5k → 4%SERENITY STABLES COMBAT TO CALM: $5k → 6%SECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION AND PLACEMENT INC: $4k → 8%POPCORN PARK ZOO: $5k → 11%SEATTLE HUMANE: $6k → 9%SERENITY STABLES COMBAT TO CALM: $5k → 6%MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $11k → 6%MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $10k → 6%MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $10k → 6%MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $10k → 6%MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $6k → 6%MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $5k → 6%MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Ritchie-Kirk Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Ritchie-Kirk Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$442k · 18 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against -26% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$442k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
-26%

Still filing today

61%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SEEING EYE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $105k · revenue +52%
  • MC
    MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA
    7× · 2017–2023 · $57k · revenue +104%
  • SC
    SECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION AND PLACEMENT IN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • SP
    SPECIAL PEOPLE UNITED TO RIDE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seattle Area Feline Rescue Fka Animal Talk Rescue

Safe rescue saves feline lives by taking in homeless cats, giving them the care they need, finding them loving homes, and supporting their human companions. we do this because we believe each cat has inherent value and that humans and…

Animals
2
Animal Samaritans

At Animal Samaritans we champion compassion and respect for all living creatures, with a primary focus on dogs, cats, and the people who love them. We view pets not merely as animals, but as members of our families. As their guardians and…

Animals
3
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
4
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
5
Partners for Animal Welfare Society

Animal shelter for the protection and care of abused and neglected animals.

Animals
6
Second Chance Humane Society Inc

Improving the lives of animals by fostering the human-animal bond.

Animals
7
Humane Society of Vero Beach and Indian River County Inc

None

Animals
8
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
9
Second Chance Pet Adoptions Inc

To champion homeless cats and dogs who are healthy or treatable in the quest to find their forever homes and engage with our community to provide responsible pet ownership reducing future generations of homeless animals.

Animals
10
Tompkins County Spca

The mission of the SPCA of Tompkins County is to protect companion animals. We are a no-kill shelter dedicated to preventing animal cruelty and overpopulation. We promote responsible pet stewardship by providing education, counseling and…

Animals
11
Silicon Valley Pet Project

Silicon valley pet project (svpp) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization committed to saving local at-risk shelter pets through rescue, community involvement and education.

Animals
12
The Animal Haven Inc

The animal haven's misson is to provide a temporary, safe, caring and humane refuge for homeless dogs and cats and place these animals in quality adoptive homes.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Animal Nations Dba Redrover; the most unlike its peers is Special People United to Ride Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $37,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSERENITY STABLES COMBAT TO CALM: $32,000 · OtherSERENITY STABLES COMBAT TO CALMTHE ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $31,500 · OtherTHE ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INCUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER: $21,000 · OtherUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVERTESS MCINTYRE FOUNDATION INC: $17,000 · OtherTESS MCINTYRE FOUNDATION INCTRI-CITY PANTRY: $7,000 · Other+3 more: $9,000 · Other+3 moreMONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $56,500 · AnimalsMONMOUTH COUNTY SPCASECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION AND PLACEMENT IN: $28,000 · AnimalsSECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION A…CAUSE4PAWS PET FOOD BANK: $21,000 · AnimalsCAUSE4PAWS PET FOOD BANKSEATTLE ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION: $13,000 · AnimalsSEATTLE ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATIONTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY: $12,000 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING …MADISON COMMUNITY CATS: $8,000 · AnimalsMADISON COMMUNITY CATS+1 more: $2,500 · AnimalsTHE SEEING EYE INC: $105,000 · Human ServicesTHE SEEING EYE INCNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION: $24,500 · HealthCourthouse Dogs Foundation: $17,000 · Crime & LegalLUNCH BREAK INC: $4,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$154,500Animals$141,000Human Services$105,000Health$24,500Crime & Legal$17,000Food & Nutrition$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $105,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $56,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION AND PLACEMENT IN: $28,000 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION: $24,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCAUSE4PAWS PET FOOD BANK: $21,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER: $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCourthouse Dogs Foundation: $17,000 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetSEATTLE ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMADISON COMMUNITY CATS: $8,000 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetLUNCH BREAK INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWHISKERS RESCUE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSPECIAL PEOPLE UNITED TO RIDE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA ↗
  • Who funds SECOND CALL THOROUGHBRED ADOPTION AND PLACEMENT IN ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAUSE4PAWS PET FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER ↗
  • Who funds Courthouse Dogs Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MADISON COMMUNITY CATS ↗
  • Who funds LUNCH BREAK INC ↗
  • Who funds WHISKERS RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL PEOPLE UNITED TO RIDE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC8.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ritchie-Kirk Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ritchie-Kirk Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Lunch Break Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ritchie-Kirk’s filings →

More from the funding graph