Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rising Phoenix Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$538k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$210k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$1.2MEnvironment$310kHealth$90kRecreation & Sports$30kPublic Safety & Disaster$28kAnimals$19kHuman Services$12kPublic Benefit$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 27 grants below total $493,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $538,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $45,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $380k
$3,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Wakefield School$210,000
Land Trust of Virginia$90,000
Blue Ridge School$80,000
Earth University Foundation$20,000
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center$20,000
WILD Foundation$10,000
Great Meadow Foundation$10,000
Americas in Wartime Experience$5,000
GETF$5,000
Downstream Foundation$5,000
Old Friends Inc$5,000
The Trevor Project$5,000
Marshall Fire and Rescue$3,000
Northern Piedmont Youth Center$3,000
Fauquier Community Food Bank$3,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 26 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
4

Total granted

$1.7M
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-4%

Still filing today

38%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentAnimalsInternationalFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WAKEFIELD SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $870k · revenue +7%
  • TB
    THE BLUE RIDGE SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $270k · revenue +27%
  • TL
    THE LAND TRUST OF VIRGINIA INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $260k · revenue +214%

Funded once

  • NC
    NYC Central Park Conservancy
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • MV
    Marshall, VA Volunteer Fire Department
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • K9S FOR WARRIORS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wild Virginia Incorporated

Protecting and connecting virginia's wild places.

Environment
2
Vcu Investment Management Company

To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…

Education
3
Historic Virginia Land Conservancy

Promoting for the benefit of the general public, the preservation, protection and enjoyment of our natural resources, principally in the lower james, york, rappahannock and chowan rivers and surrounding watersheds.

Environment
4
The Vermont River Conservancy Inc

Protect land along rivers, lakes and wetlands of vt; protect public access, wildlife habitat, scenic natural beauty, and ecological integrity.

Human Services
5
Virginia Agribusiness Council

Represent the agriculture, forestry, and agribusiness community in virginia.

—
6
The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc

To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.

Environment
7
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
8
Fallbrook Land Conservancy

To acquire, protect, and manage open space in perpetuity for the benefit of wildlife and the community.

Environment
9
Land Conservancy of Ridgefield Inc

The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…

Environment
10
Franklin Land Trust Inc

The franklin land trust works to conserve farms, forests, wildlands, and other natural resources significant to the quality of the environment, economy, and rural character of western massachusetts.

Environment
11
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
12
The Piedmont Environmental Council

Protect and restore the lands and waters of the virginia piedmont, while building stronger, more sustainable communities.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Great Meadow Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marshall Ruritan Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WAKEFIELD SCHOOL INC: $870,000 · EducationWAKEFIELD SCHOOL INCTHE BLUE RIDGE SCHOOL INC: $270,000 · EducationTHE BLUE RIDGE SCHOOL INCTHE LAND TRUST OF VIRGINIA INC: $260,000 · EnvironmentTHE LAND TRUST OF V…GREAT MEADOW FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · EnvironmentGREAT MEADOW FOUNDA…FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $70,000 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSO…INTERNATIONAL WILDERNESS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL …NYC Central Park Conservancy: $10,000 · OtherAmericas in Wartime Experience: $10,000 · OtherMarshall Fire and Rescue: $8,000 · Other+17 more: $75,000 · Other+17 moreEARTH University Foundation Inc: $50,000 · InternationalOld Friends Inc: $10,000 · AnimalsK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $2,000 · AnimalsTREVOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsFAUQUIER COMMUNITY FOOD BANK & THRIFT STORE: $9,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$1,140,000Environment$290,000Other$213,000International$50,000Animals$12,000Civil Rights$10,000Food & Nutrition$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWAKEFIELD SCHOOL INC: $870,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetTHE BLUE RIDGE SCHOOL INC: $270,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE LAND TRUST OF VIRGINIA INC: $260,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEARTH University Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL WILDERNESS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGREAT MEADOW FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetOld Friends Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAUQUIER COMMUNITY FOOD BANK & THRIFT STORE: $9,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WAKEFIELD SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BLUE RIDGE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LAND TRUST OF VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EARTH University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL WILDERNESS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT MEADOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Old Friends Inc ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds FAUQUIER COMMUNITY FOOD BANK & THRIFT STORE ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Marshall Ruritan Club ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds Middleburg Volunteer Fire Department ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tara Foundation IncVA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tara Foundation Inc · The Luminescence Foundation Inc · Wise Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rising Phoenix Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Rising Phoenix Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $619k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rising Phoenix’s filings →

More from the funding graph