Skip to content

· Private foundation

Risdal Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$57k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$118kEducation$63kHealth$63kYouth Development$15kCivil Rights$14kInternational$10kCrime & Legal$7kFood & Nutrition$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$94k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAINTS PETER PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH$27,500
BOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF STORY COUNTY$10,000
OBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS$5,000
ST CECILIA CATHOLIC CHURCH$5,000
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$3,500
ST JUDES CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPIT$2,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,000
MAYO CLINIC$1,000
IOWA RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUND$1,000
ST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH$500
UNBOUND$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNBOUND: $960 → 16%UNBOUND: $960 → 16%UNBOUND: $864 → 16%UNBOUND: $864 → 16%UNBOUND: $500 → 16%UNBOUND: $480 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
MA
SD
IA
OH
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$279k · 18 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$279k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+87%

Still filing today

56%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +1%
  • GE
    GILBERT EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $25k · revenue +67%
  • MG
    MARY GREELEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2022 · $11k · revenue +276%

Funded once

  • Mercy Ships Internationalgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +87%
  • FOOD FOR THE POOR INC
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue -56%
  • SA
    ST AMBROSE CATHEDRAL
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
2
Abim Foundation

See schedule o.as an operating charity, the abim foundation develops and implements projects in support of our mission to advance the core values of medical professionalism as a force to improve the quality of health care.

Health
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
5
Unmc Physicians

Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.

Health
6
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
8
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
9
Inova Health System Foundation

Inova health system foundation is the parent of inova health system (ihs). ihs provides healthcare and related services throughout northern virginia and the greater metropolitan washington, d.c. area, including certain contiguous counties…

Health
10
Good Samaritan Foundation

Partnering for healing and a healthy future through philanthropy.

—
11
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
American Board of Medical Specialties

In collaboration with its member boards, abms creates standards for board certification for physicians and medical specialists. specifically, for initial and continuing certification. abms and its member boards establish rigorous standards…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marthas House of Hope Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINTS PETER PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH: $93,333 · OtherSAINTS PETER PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCHST JUDES CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPIT: $27,100 · OtherST JUDES CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITIOWA RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUND: $14,000 · OtherIOWA RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUNDST CECILIA CATHOLIC CHURCH: $13,500 · OtherST CECILIA CATHOLIC CHURCHBOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF STORY COUNTY: $13,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF STORY COUNTYST AMBROSE CATHOLIC CHURCH-DEADWOOD: $7,000 · Other+14 more: $9,350 · OtherIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $38,400 · EducationIOWA STATE UNI…MARY GREELEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $10,500 · HealthMARY GREE…BRIDGES OF IOWA: $7,000 · HealthBRIDGES O…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,500 · HealthAMERICAN …International Rett Syndrome Foundation: $2,000 · HealthInternati…MARTHAS HOUSE OF HOPE INC: $1,500 · HealthMARTHAS H…MAYO CLINIC: $1,000 · HealthGILBERT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $24,515 · PhilanthropyGILBERT E…OBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $16,500 · Civil RightsMercy Ships International: $5,000 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $3,600 · InternationalUnbound: $4,628 · Human Services
Other$177,283Education$38,400Health$25,500Philanthropy$24,515Civil Rights$16,500International$8,600Human Services$4,628

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $38,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGILBERT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $24,515 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetOBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $16,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMARY GREELEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBRIDGES OF IOWA: $7,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMercy Ships International: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnbound: $4,628 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rett Syndrome Foundation: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHAS HOUSE OF HOPE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetDISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVietnam Veterans Memorial Fund Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GILBERT EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds MARY GREELEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES OF IOWA ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds Unbound ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rett Syndrome Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MARTHAS HOUSE OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH9.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Risdal Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Risdal Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Risdal Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph