Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ripples a Not-For-Profit Corporati

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$213k
Granted FY2026still arriving
7
Grants FY2026still arriving
6
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Science & Tech$480kEnvironment$362kEducation$186kFood & Nutrition$126kInternational$120kSocial Science$50kHealth$36kHuman Services$9kOther$0
02FY2026 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$30,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$924k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ENVIROMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$75,000
WOLD CENTER KITCHENS$50,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$30,000
THE 22Q FAMILY FOUNDATION$30,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$25,000
MCCORMICK FOUNDATION$2,000
WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FORESTDALE: $4k → 13%FORESTDALE: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
CA
CO
MD
AR
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 14 repeat orgs$252k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2026, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
17

Total granted

$1.4M
$221k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+36%

Still filing today

43%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EnvironmentInternationalEducationHealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
    4× · 2022–2026 · $325k · revenue +56%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2020–2026 · $145k · revenue +39%
  • THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $30k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTIAN INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • MS
    METHANE SAT LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
4
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
5
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
6
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech
7
Open Technology Fund

The open technology fund aims to advance internet freedom globally by supporting the research, development, implementation, and maintenance of technologies that provide secure and uncensored access to the internet.

Arts & Culture
8
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
9
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
10
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cantigny Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Chicago Tribune Charities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNION OF CONCERENED SCIENTISITS: $450,000 · OtherUNION OF CONCERENED SCIENTISITSWOLD CENTER KITCHENS: $175,000 · OtherWOLD CENTER KITCHENSUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $110,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOISRMI: $60,000 · OtherRMIROCKY MOUNTIAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $50,000 · OtherROCKY MOUNTIAN INSTITUTE: $50,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN: $50,000 · OtherMETHANE SAT LLC: $50,000 · Other+17 more: $51,850 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $325,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE …+1 more: $10,000 · EnvironmentMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $145,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SA…THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $30,000 · InternationalTHE UNION O…The 22Q Family Foundation Inc: $55,000 · HealthGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $30,000 · Food & NutritionUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $25,000 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · EducationFORESTDALE INC: $6,000 · Human Services
Other$1,046,850Environment$335,000International$175,000Health$55,000Food & Nutrition$30,000Education$26,000Human Services$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $325,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $145,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe 22Q Family Foundation Inc: $55,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORESTDALE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONEAMERICA: $5,110 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MAINTENANCE FOR THE ELDERLY INC: $1,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKEVIN DOWLING SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $1,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetCANTIGNY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds The 22Q Family Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FORESTDALE INC ↗
  • Who funds ONEAMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ROBERT R MCCORMICK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MAINTENANCE FOR THE ELDERLY INC ↗
  • Who funds KEVIN DOWLING SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
  • Who funds CANTIGNY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY13.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ripples a Not-For-Profit Corporati funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ripples a Not-For-Profit Corporati. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ripples a Not-For-Profit Corporati’s filings →

    More from the funding graph